TikToker Daniel Larson pleads guilty and faces 5 years prison for bomb threats

by

Daniel Larson has admitted in federal court that he’s guilty of a crime related to making threats online, according to recent court filings.

A lawsuit in Colorado federal court revolves around posts made by Larson on social media from the middle of 2023 to the beginning of 2024.

According to prosecutors, the online posts contained threats to bomb buildings and injure a federal officer. Some of these statements specifically mentioned the White House and other landmarks.

TopMob has obtained documents showing that on April 9, 2026, Larson pleaded guilty to threatening someone across state lines. As part of the deal, prosecutors dropped several other charges related to the same incident.

Plea deal outlines sentencing range and dismissed charges

As part of the deal, prosecutors will allow Larson to be sentenced to the time they’ve already spent in jail. Larson has been held in custody since April 30th, 2024.

Larson gave up his right to appeal the conviction or challenge the sentence, as part of the agreement. He also agreed to hand over any property connected to the case, such as a cell phone that was taken as evidence.

Legal documents show Larson repeatedly made threats online over a period of time. On at least one occasion, police investigated a bomb threat at a Colorado building, forcing an evacuation and a thorough search. Fortunately, no explosives were discovered.

If convicted, the defendant could face up to five years in prison, followed by as much as three years of supervised release, and a fine of up to $250,000. While sentencing guidelines suggest a prison term of 27 to 33 months, the judge will ultimately decide the sentence.

Before entering his guilty plea, Larson signed a document stating he understood the charges against him, the possible punishments, and that he was voluntarily giving up his right to a trial by jury.

The document shows Larson admitted to willingly entering the plea, without any extra promises beyond what was in the agreement, and confirmed the prosecutors’ account of events was accurate.

Read More

2026-04-10 19:18