As a researcher with a background in financial regulation and cryptocurrencies, I find Coinbase’s legal actions against the SEC and FDIC concerning. The lack of transparency and communication from these regulatory bodies can create uncertainty and hinder the growth of the crypto industry.


Coinbase, the biggest US cryptocurrency trading platform, has initiated legal action against both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), alleging they have neglected to provide required information for resolved cryptocurrency investigations.

Based on documents submitted to the US District Court for the District of Columbia, Coinbase is attempting to force the SEC and FDIC to abide by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and provide requested information to industry members.

Coinbase Sues SEC and FDIC

Coinbase asserts that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is taking a more aggressive stance towards the burgeoning crypto industry, asserting broad regulatory powers. However, the SEC’s justification for this newfound authority is questionable under securities laws. Regrettably, instead of providing clear clarification, the agency has opted to engage in an enforcement campaign against crypto companies.

The regulator, in collaboration with other financial regulatory bodies such as the FDIC, is working to disassociate cryptocurrency companies from traditional banking systems, aiming to significantly weaken the digital asset industry.

Coinbase and consulting firm History Associates have challenged the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide evidence supporting its jurisdiction over the crypto sector. Specifically, they have asked the SEC to disclose documents related to three probes into these companies and individuals. One of these investigations centers around Ethereum‘s native digital asset, Ether, which the SEC declared was not classified as a security back in 2018.

Last week, the investigation conducted by the agency regarding Ethereum 2.0, the proof-of-stake network, came to a close. This decision implies that Ether, the cryptocurrency associated with Ethereum, is not classified as a security. Previously, investigations into other matters had been concluded years ago, but the SEC has kept all related records undisclosed in the three cases. Coinbase, a popular cryptocurrency exchange, alleges that this withholding of information goes against the SEC’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) obligations.

As a crypto investor, I strongly believe that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) evolving perspective on securities laws is not clear-cut and leaves us in a state of uncertainty. This ambiguity denies regulated parties, including myself, the necessary fair warning required by due process. Consequently, we are left to speculate if our activities will be deemed securities transactions, potentially exposing us to investigations, prosecutions, and penalties that may apply retroactively.

SEC’s Ongoing Suit Against Coinbase

The FDIC’s refusal to issue letters asking financial institutions to halt crypto-related transactions indefinitely was disclosed by Coinbase’s legal chief, Paul Grewal. Remarkably, the FDIC’s Office of Inspector General has previously criticized such actions, arguing that they could stifle financial progress and development in the cryptocurrency sector.

As a researcher studying government transparency and financial regulation, I firmly believe that the current methods are insufficient. It’s not how things should be done, especially when it comes to running a transparent government. We, as concerned citizens, expect more from our financial regulators. I am grateful for the Court’s recognition of these crucial issues and am eager to provide further updates in due course.

Currently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is engaged in a legal dispute with Coinbase over allegations that the company is running an unlicensed securities exchange.

Read More

2024-06-27 19:25