As a seasoned crypto investor with a strong background in technology and privacy, I am closely monitoring the latest developments surrounding the Worldcoin project and its controversial biometric data collection practices. The recent setback in Hong Kong, where the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) ordered a halt to all Worldcoin operations due to alleged violations of local privacy regulations, is a significant blow to the project’s reputation.


As a researcher studying the cryptocurrency landscape, I’ve come across the latest development regarding the Worldcoin project. Unfortunately, this controversial initiative has encountered another major hurdle. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) in Hong Kong has instructed the Worldcoin Foundation to cease all operations within their jurisdiction. This decision was made due to concerns that Worldcoin’s practices do not comply with local privacy regulations.

This week, the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) disclosed that at least 8,302 people had their facial and iris biometric information obtained by Worldcoin during their activities in Hong Kong.

Based on my analysis of ten clandestine investigations carried out at six Worldcoin sites between December 2023 and January 2024, it became clear to me that the extensive gathering of biometric information was redundant and disproportionate. I went further to conclude that these actions blatantly contravened the data protection guidelines enshrined in Hong Kong’s privacy legislation.

Verifying Humanness: A Conundrum

The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) in Hong Kong expressed concern over Worldcoin’s data retention policy, stating that the company will keep users’ personal information for up to ten years to develop AI models for verifying identities. The PCPD considers this timeframe “excessively long.” Additionally, the agency suggested that there exist less intrusive methods for confirming human status.

It is important to note that Hong Kong isn’t the only region that has objected to Worldcoin and its controversial iris-scanning orbs. In fact, the Sam Altman-headed project has encountered difficulties in multiple regions regarding its digital ID collection. In March, South Korea initiated an investigation following complaints about the project’s gathering of personal information. Similarly, Spain and Portugal have instructed the project to cease collecting users’ biometric data.

As a crypto investor and privacy advocate, I’ve voiced concerns several times that Worldcoin is not the way to achieve proof-of-personhood. However, Billy Luedtke, the Founder and CEO of Intuition, a decentralized identity startup, has praised the project instead.

As the significance of confirming the origin of information increases in the face of AI’s rapid progression, Luedtke stressed that initiatives like Worldcoin and other decentralized identity projects are effectively tackling this issue. They offer solutions designed to enable individuals to prove their human identity in an intricately woven digital landscape where discerning genuine human interaction becomes increasingly complicated.

In a statement to CryptoPotato, the exec said,

Despite valid worries about data privacy, the convenience of the internet is hindered by an excessive amount of automated activity, eroded trust, and fractured identity structures. Fostering discussions between governments and businesses, coupled with advancements in technology that safeguard privacy such as personal data ownership, promises continued advancement and creativity in this domain.

What Does Hong Kong’s Rejection of Worldcoin Mean For Crypto?

As the Co-Founder and CEO of Artela Network, I, Jerry Li, view Hong Kong’s decision to suspend Worldcoin’s operations as a clear demonstration of their unwavering commitment to enforcing cryptocurrency regulations, with a particular focus on data privacy and biometric data collection.

In a statement to CryptoPotato, Li expressed that this stringent method is likely to establish a significant trend in the APAC area, encouraging other cryptocurrency initiatives to focus on data privacy and compliance with local laws.

The executive clarified that this action does not signal Hong Kong’s antagonism towards cryptocurrencies.

“Shutting down Worldcoin’s business doesn’t automatically mean that Hong Kong is hostile towards cryptocurrencies. Despite its stringent data privacy laws, Hong Kong remains favorable to the crypto sector by providing clear regulations, government encouragement, strong financial foundations, and industry endorsement.”

Read More

2024-05-26 22:33