As an analyst with over two decades of experience in financial markets, I’ve seen my fair share of legal battles and regulatory hurdles. The recent development in Kalshi’s election prediction market case is intriguing, to say the least.


Kalshi’s election prediction market operations are poised to commence shortly, following a federal judge’s decision on Thursday to deny the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) request for a temporary delay of two weeks in the implementation of the court’s previous ruling that authorized the contracts.

Immediately following Judge Jia M. Cobb’s comprehensive explanation of her reasoning behind approving Kalshi’s motion for summary judgment in the U.S. District Court, I participated in a telephonic hearing. This decision was issued by the judge last Friday.

It’s still uncertain when Kalshi will make their contracts available for trading, where people can wager on which party will hold control over each house of Congress following an election. Following their court victory last week, the company announced on its website that “election contracts are coming to Kalshi.” However, as of 12 PM Eastern Time on Thursday, they have not yet completed the self-certification process for these contracts, a common step before launching a new product on a derivatives exchange.

During the hearing, a representative of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) stated that they intend to challenge the case initiated by the trading platform. Although Judge Cobb declined the CFTC’s request for a temporary halt, they might still petition a higher court to suspend the company from listing the contracts during the duration of the appeal.

Read More

2024-09-12 19:14