As an experienced securities law analyst, I believe that the SEC’s lawsuit against Consensys marks a significant escalation in the regulatory crackdown on cryptocurrency companies offering unregistered securities. The allegations against Consensys, specifically regarding its MetaMask Staking and Swaps services, are not new ground for the agency. Uniswap Labs and Coinbase have faced similar accusations.


On Wednesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought charges against Consensys, an Ethereum infrastructure provider, for not registering certain essential services provided through its MetaMask software wallet.

Two months ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its intention to file a lawsuit against ConsenSys by sending a Wells notice. The Ethereum wallet developed by ConsenSys, which boasts on its website of being trusted by over 100 million users worldwide, is at the center of the SEC’s concerns.

The SEC’s Next Target: Consensys

In a press statement on Wednesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleged that ConsenSys offered and sold “securities without registration” through its MetaMask Staking service. This involved “thousands upon thousands of unregistered securities” acting on behalf of both Lido and Rocketpool – two liquid staking providers with which Lido collaborates.

From my perspective as a financial analyst, it appears that MetaMask’s Staking and Swaps services might have put the company in a precarious position. By offering investment advice on cryptocurrencies, executing trades on their behalf, and charging substantial fees for these services, they could potentially be functioning as an unregistered broker, which is against securities regulations.

Gurbir S. Grewal, the Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division, stated that ConsenSys boldly entered the U.S. securities markets, yet denied investors the safeguards provided by federal securities laws.

This week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) concluded its probe into Consensys over Ethereum 2.0’s possible designation as an unregistered security. Some analysts argue that the SEC’s recent green light for Ethereum spot ETFs implies that Ethereum is considered a commodity, thus falling outside the SEC’s jurisdiction.

Before the SEC’s announcement on Friday, Consensys initiated a legal action against the SEC in an attempt to obtain a court ruling that their staking and swap services are compliant with securities regulations.

Nothing New For The SEC

I’ve discovered that Uniswap Labs, the innovators behind Ethereum’s leading decentralized exchange, have recently been under scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC has issued a Wells notice to Uniswap Labs, implying potential regulatory action. However, Uniswap Labs has publicly expressed dissatisfaction with the justification provided by the SEC for this notice, deeming it insufficient.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase for providing unregistered brokerage services via its centralized exchange platform and Ethereum-mobile wallet app. Previously raised accusations concerning the Coinbase wallet have been dismissed in court.

“I believe Consensys was expressing frustration with the SEC’s latest legal action against them, which they perceived as an unwarranted expansion of regulatory power.”

“Our firm is determined to persistently advance our argument in the Texas courts regarding these issues, as this outcome significantly impacts not just our business but also the prospective growth of web3 as a whole.”

Read More

2024-06-29 02:12