• Airdrop farmers have expressed their disappointment at Scroll’s decision to allocate 5.5% of the total supply to the Binance Launchpool.
  • 15% has been set aside for airdrops, with 7% to be distributed on Oct. 22.
  • Several tokens released on the Binance Launchpool have suffered major declines in asset price shortly after being listed.

As a seasoned analyst with years of experience in the crypto market, I find myself constantly navigating the intricate dynamics that define this ever-evolving landscape. The recent controversy surrounding Scroll’s (SCR) airdrop allocation has certainly piqued my interest.


Farmers who use Airdrop are upset about the distribution of Scroll’s (SCR) airdrops this week, as 7% is earmarked for early supporters and 5.5% is going to Binance‘s Launchpool users through centralized exchanges like Binance.

The suggested SCR token by Scroll will serve the purpose of governance, aiming to eventually evolve into a utility token within the protocol as Scroll moves towards increased decentralization.

The overall quantity of SCR tokens will amount to 1 billion. Out of this total, 150 million tokens are reserved for potential future airdrops, with 70 million scheduled for distribution on October 22nd. Meanwhile, 170 million tokens are allocated for investors, and the Scroll Foundation will receive 100 million tokens.

The frustration stems from the 5.5% allocated to the Binance Launchpool. Binance users can increase their allocation by “staking” larger amounts of Binance’s BNB token to the launchpool, making the distribution skewed in favor of larger holders.

As a researcher examining the current state of airdrops, I find myself reflecting on Axel Bitblaze’s words: “I can’t help but wonder if we’re still chasing airdrops like it’s 2022. It seems it’s time to confront the truth. The Scroll project, for example, has rewarded just 7% after two years of hard work, while Binance Launchpool farmers have reaped 5% in a matter of days. This stark contrast underscores the reality that we, as participants, are being milked, and venture capitalists hold the favorable positions. It’s clear that the airdrop landscape has evolved.

As a researcher, I’d like to share a response from one of Scroll’s key contributors, sandyzkp on X. In addressing criticism, they expressed that Binance is not merely a listing platform; rather, it represents the optimal route for global distribution. They further explained that partnering with Binance would provide us with on-ramp and off-ramp channels, thereby facilitating our growth, particularly in emerging markets.

Additionally, it’s important to mention that some tokens launched on Binance Launchpool didn’t have a strong beginning in terms of trading success. For instance, Arkham’s ARKM started at 90 cents but quickly fell to 30 cents, while Portal’s PORTAL dropped from an initial price of $3.60 to $2.08 within three days after release. Similarly, Ether.fi (ETHFI) debuted at $4.13 and has since declined to $1.44.

Read More

2024-10-11 19:36