Good Boy Retells Stephen King’s Scariest Story (in Reverse)

by

Numerous authors and directors have explored animal horror, but Stephen King truly stands out. Even after 42 years, the terrifying imagery of *Cujo* – one of his most frightening creations – still haunts viewers. The 1983 film based on his novel presented a chillingly simple idea: a friendly, devoted St. Bernard is bitten by a rabid bat and gradually becomes a relentless, savage killer. The story resonated with a fundamental fear of the natural world turning hostile, and surprisingly, it helped establish the “killer dog” as a lasting horror staple.

Look, for years, *Cujo* pretty much defined animal horror – a terrifying dog turning bad. But a new film, released this year, is completely subverting that trope, and honestly, it’s brilliant. It’s quietly become a huge talking point, racking up a 91% score on Rotten Tomatoes. Director Ben Leonberg takes the idea of a canine lead and flips it – instead of a monster, this dog is a hero. It’s a really interesting shift, and it feels like a sign of how much the horror genre has matured, becoming more about understanding and even *feeling* for its creatures.

While Cujo Was a Tortured Soul, Indy Is a Loyal Protector

The horror in *Cujo* is straightforward, impactful, and stays with you. It tells the story of a normally friendly dog who becomes infected with rabies after being bitten by a bat while chasing a rabbit. This infection tragically turns him into a dangerous killer. While claustrophobic settings are common in horror films, *Cujo* creates an unusually intense and frightening atmosphere, reaching a level of suspense similar to the terrifying chase scene in *The Shining*.

The most memorable part of *Cujo* involves a mother, Donna, and her young son, Tad, stranded in their car – a broken-down Ford Pinto – under the scorching sun. A huge, rabid St. Bernard relentlessly attacks them, creating a terrifying and violent situation. It’s a difficult scene to watch because you desperately want them to survive, but you also feel the sadness of seeing a once-friendly dog driven to madness.

Unlike many horror films, *Good Boy* flips the typical formula. The movie centers around Indy, a golden retriever who isn’t a monster, but a hero fighting against one. The story follows Indy and his owner, Todd, as they move to a remote cabin when Todd’s health starts to decline. As Todd battles a strange illness that makes him unpredictable and sometimes violent, Indy is the only one who realizes a genuine, supernatural danger is present in their home.

While Stephen King’s *Cujo* relied on a dog to create fear and danger, the film *Good Boy* presents a dog as a symbol of loyalty, understanding, and care. Indy isn’t just a pet; he’s a reliable friend and protector who is always watchful over his owner. This shift in perspective isn’t merely a change in the storyline—it fundamentally alters the emotional heart of the film. The filmmakers described their approach as focusing on the realistic limitations of an ordinary house pet, without any added superpowers or narration.

While ‘Cujo’ depicted a terrifying experience for a pet owner, ‘Good Boy’ offers a playful look at what dogs might think when we’re not paying attention.

Cujo’s Legacy — Fear, Subtext, and Survival in King’s Scariest Story

A key reason why the film resonates is that it’s more than just a horror movie about a dangerous dog. Beneath the surface thrills, it’s a sad and moving story about a family already struggling, a point that many early reviews overlooked. When the film was first released, critics were sharply divided. *Variety* described it as a boring addition to the horror genre, and Roger Ebert famously called it terrible.

Opinions on the film were sharply divided. While some found it underwhelming, critics like Leonard Maltin called it “genuinely frightening” and praised its gradual build-up of tension. This difference in reaction probably stemmed from the film’s deliberate focus on the family’s internal struggles. The Trentons were already facing a crisis long before the dog became a threat. The mother was having an affair, and the father was struggling with his career, leaving the family fractured and burdened by unspoken guilt.

There’s a personal layer to this story because Stephen King himself has a distant relationship with the novel it’s based on. He’s said in his memoir that he hardly remembers writing it, as he was going through a difficult time in his own life. This connection between King’s experience and the story’s themes of losing control adds depth and resonance. Furthermore, the actors’ performances powerfully capture the emotional turmoil within the family.

Dee Wallace gave a remarkable performance as Donna. While the role could have easily been a typical ‘scream queen,’ Wallace brought depth and strength to the character, portraying a mother’s unwavering determination to protect her family. Stephen King has consistently praised her work, and once said in an interview:

The film’s ending sparked debate. While Stephen King’s original novel has a tragic ending where the young boy dies, director Paul Wallace fought for a different outcome. He convinced the producers to let the boy live, and King eventually agreed, admitting that part of the book had drawn more negative reactions from readers than anything else he’d ever written.

Good Boy Marks a New Era of Animal Horror

As a huge fan of both animal-focused stories and horror, I think *Good Boy* is exactly the kind of movie we need right now. It feels like a natural progression for the genre, reflecting how we see animals and enjoy horror differently than we used to. What I really love is that it taps into that little worry every pet owner has – that secret question of ‘what if?’ It’s a simple idea, but it’s genuinely creepy because it feels so real.

The film was made in a unique way. Director Ben Leorberg spent three years filming with his dog, Indy, approaching the project like a documentary. This results in a truly immersive experience, as critics have pointed out. The horror of the story is felt through Indy’s senses – what he hears and smells – rather than being directly shown, which creates a building sense of suspense.

One of the film’s strengths is its realistic portrayal of the dog, Indy. He isn’t shown as an unusually smart or capable hero; instead, he acts like a normal dog, getting frightened and feeling helpless. This realism is important because it highlights that Indy’s biggest fear isn’t the ghost itself, but rather watching his owner’s health decline. This shifts the story’s focus from a typical ghost story to a more powerful and relatable theme: the fear of seeing a loved one suffer and being unable to help.

This change is also evident in how the film creates empathy and uses social and human problems to build tension. Unlike typical stories, *Good Boy* doesn’t focus on a character’s development; the director intentionally portrays the dog as unchanging – equally good and innocent from start to finish. The film is designed to make the audience worry about what will happen to him, and this strong emotional connection has attracted a wide range of viewers.

Viewers at film festivals have been surprised by how much they enjoyed the movie, even if they don’t usually like horror. Many said they watched it simply because it featured a dog! While some critics have pointed out that the lack of dialogue and focus on the dog can feel a little repetitive, most agree the film is deeply moving. Ultimately, it’s the dog Indy’s unwavering devotion to his owner that makes the movie so impactful.

Instead of ignoring the impact of *Cujo*, the film *Good Boy* builds upon it by telling the story through the dog’s perspective, allowing us to experience events through his senses and emotions.

As a movie fan, I was really moved by *Good Boy*. It ends on a note that’s definitely sad and even tragic, but somehow it also feels… comforting and genuinely touching. What struck me most wasn’t the typical fear of a friend betraying you, but the thought that when things are at their worst, they might be the only ones who truly *won’t* abandon you. It’s a quietly powerful idea that’s stuck with me.

Read More

2025-10-07 00:08