The spread between ether and bitcoin implied volatility indexes has widened, reflecting excitement about the potential debut of spot ETH ETFs in the U.S.Volatility pricing may be off the mark because institutions might use the spot ETFs to set up non-directional basis trades, as they have been reportedly doing in BTC.Demand for ether ETFs may be tepid.
As an analyst with experience in cryptocurrency markets and derivatives, I believe the widening spread between ether (ETH) and bitcoin (BTC) implied volatility indexes could be a false signal. The excitement surrounding the potential debut of spot ETH ETFs in the U.S. has led to increased expectations for higher volatility in ether relative to bitcoin. However, this might not hold up for long.As a researcher studying the financial markets, I’ve noticed an exciting development: Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are predicted to launch in the US market this year. This long-awaited event has investors preparing for potential heightened volatility in ether (ETH) prices compared to bitcoin (BTC).

One perspective holds that the enthusiasm surrounding spot ethereum ETFs might not be justified, according to some onlookers.

The difference in implied volatility between 30-day forward-looking indexes for Ether (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC) on Deribit, the leading crypto options exchange, turned positive in April. This spread has since increased to approximately 17%. Implied volatility refers to the market’s prediction of future price fluctuations based on option prices.

As an analyst, I’ve noticed that Ether’s implied volatility has remained higher than Bitcoin’s for more than two months. However, this disparity might not last, as per the assessment of Greg Magadini, the Director of Derivatives at Amberdata.

As an analyst, I express my ongoing doubt that the relative volatility premium will endure. The recent wave of skepticism surrounding Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) inflows has intensified, with some market participants suggesting that these inflows might merely represent traders taking advantage of basis trading opportunities rather than a genuine appetite for ETF exposure to Bitcoin.

A significant amount of enthusiasm for spot Ethereum ETFs may be due to the approximately $15 billion that investors have poured into Bitcoin ETFs since their launch in January.

Elevated Ether Volatility Expectations May Be Unfounded

At first, Bitcoin’s price rose in tandem with the inflow of funds into Bitcoin ETFs. However, this upward trend has since come to a halt. The primary reason for this, according to industry insiders, is that most of these ETF inflows are not indicative of bullish sentiment towards Bitcoin but rather part of non-directional arbitrage strategies like the cash and carry or basis trade.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that the hype surrounding the launch of a bullish spot Ethereum Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) has subsided somewhat. However, it’s essential to remember that institutions may employ these ETFs for setting up basis trades. In simpler terms, they can buy the ETF and simultaneously borrow or short sell Ethereum futures contracts to profit from price differences between the two markets. Consequently, even if a spot Ethereum ETF isn’t launched right away, alternative trading strategies using existing instruments remain available.

“If this is the case, does the ETH ETF demonstrate significant price reactions when trading begins for it, as indicated by substantial price differences throughout its term structure?”
Elevated Ether Volatility Expectations May Be Unfounded

The term structure illustrates the implied volatility for various maturities in a visual format and typically follows an upward trend: greater volatility is anticipated as the maturity length increases. Ether’s term structure shows a notable rise compared to bitcoin‘s, signaling heightened expectations for volatility across all time horizons.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed an intriguing development that could indicate the market’s enthusiasm for spot Ether Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) might be premature. According to data from Velo, open interest in ether futures listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange is significantly lower than that of bitcoin futures. To be precise, the open interest for ether futures amounts to roughly $1.6 billion, whereas bitcoin futures boast almost ten times as much at around $10 billion. This disparity could suggest a more subdued market sentiment towards Ether’s derivatives compared to Bitcoin’s, which might be worth keeping in mind as we navigate the crypto landscape.

As an analyst, I’ve noticed a significant difference between Bitcoin’s current institutional acceptance and that of Ethereum. The upcoming Ethereum-based Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) might not attract the same level of inflows as Bitcoin due to Ethereum’s still-evolving position in the financial world. JPMorgan, a leading investment banking firm, forecasted that Ethereum ETFs could only garner around $3 billion in net assets this year.

As a researcher delving into the topic of the enduring ethereum (ETH) options premium relative to bitcoin (BTC), my findings suggest that unraveling this mystery hinges upon examining the authentic ETF inflows and trading volumes. If these figures bear any resemblance to the Open Interest (OI) between Bitcoin and Ethereum futures contracts on CME, my analysis indicates that Ethereum may not yet have garnered the mainstream fervor that Bitcoin has experienced.

Magadini expressed his long-term affection for Ethereum, but identified a potential trading chance based on the immediate Ethereum-relative value pricing.

As a volatility trader, I focus on capitalizing on price fluctuations by making strategic bets. When I foresee a potential decrease in the implied volatility, I take advantage of this expectation by selling options or volatility futures.

Read More

2024-06-19 14:38