• The Bitcoin Runes protocol experienced a significant decrease in activity and fee revenue after its initial surge after the Bitcoin halving.
  • Runes takes the Ordinals protocol a step further by making transactions cheaper and faster, but has failed to maintain meaningful traction among users.
  • Despite the initial excitement, the protocol’s momentum has slowed, and its impact on the Bitcoin ecosystem remains to be seen.

As an analyst with a background in blockchain technology and experience tracking market trends, I have closely monitored the Bitcoin Runes protocol since its launch. Initially, there was immense excitement surrounding the new project, with significant activity and fee revenue generated within the first ten days after its introduction. However, the situation has taken a turn for the worse over the past few weeks, as we’ve seen a sharp decrease in all key performance indicators, including fees, new Runes issuance, and overall user activity.


As an analyst, I’ve observed a noticeable decrease in activity on the Bitcoin Runes protocol within the past week. Despite its promising beginning last month, it seems to have struggled in gaining significant user adoption.

Runes builds upon the Ordinals protocol, enhancing it to make transactions not only cheaper but also swifter. Ordinals represent a method for encoding information onto the Bitcoin blockchain through referencing digital artwork in tiny Bitcoin transactions.

As a researcher studying blockchain technology, I’ve observed an intriguing development: the recent activation of Runes following Bitcoin’s fourth halving on April 20th. Data obtained from Dune Analytics reveals that within its initial ten-day period, this new protocol issued over 85,000 tokens and accumulated around $3 million in fees.

Over the past fortnight, there has been a significant decline of over 50% in all metrics – encompassing fees, newly minted Runes, and user engagement. Only approximately 5,000 new Runes have been produced since May 1, resulting in nearly $100,000 in accrued fees.

Bitcoin Runes Protocol Sees Traction Waning After Much-Hyped Introduction
At its height, Runes dominated Bitcoin’s transactions and fees, representing approximately 80% of the entire network’s activity. However, it currently contributes only 20%. It is important to mention that this decline occurred during a broader market slump characterized by plummeting bitcoin (BTC) prices and sluggish growth in alternative tokens. The resulting negative sentiment towards emerging technology may have played a role in Runes’ diminished popularity.
Bitcoin Runes Protocol Sees Traction Waning After Much-Hyped Introduction

Built for memes and ‘degens’

Before the official launch of Runes on social media platform X, there was tremendous buzz surrounding it due to the vision of its creator, Casey Rodamor. He intended for Runes to become a protocol that would be conducive to meme coin trading and attractive to “degen” traders. Some industry insiders believed that this new protocol could mimic the thriving meme coin community on other blockchains like Solana and Ethereum, thereby generating even more excitement and speculation around obscure memes.

In just a week, the value of PUPS, a Runes token, soared from a market capitalization of under $10 million to an impressive $150 million. This significant increase was fueled by backing from influential figures in the crypto world, including Arthur Hayes, the founder of BitMEX.

Prior to Ordinals’ introduction, numerous NFT collections and tokens were introduced on Ordinals as well as Ethereum, with each aim seeking to migrate over and establish themselves as the most significant compilations following the launch. This pre-launch frenzy led Bitcoin-based NFTs to outshine other popular platforms such as Ethereum and Solana, with tens of millions worth of transactions taking place in a relatively small non-fungible token market.

Critics argue that although Runes could contribute to the development of Bitcoin’s infrastructure, significant progress remains necessary.

Ho Chan Chung, marketing head at CryptoQuant, expressed his doubts about the success of Bitcoin Layer 2 (L2) projects relying on OP_Return, given the fundamental differences between UTXO-based and smart contract-based blockchain networks. He conveyed this perspective to CoinDesk via a Telegram message. The conflicting nature of Bitcoin’s role as a digital currency and the distinct characteristics of the underlying blockchain network present significant challenges that these projects must address.

Chung remarked, “The Lightning Network successfully demonstrated its capabilities. In contrast, Ordinals, BRC-20, and Runes have yet to capture the public’s attention and win the ongoing narrative.”

Read More

2024-05-14 12:46