As someone who has been following the cryptocurrency industry for years, I’ve seen my fair share of ups and downs, especially when it comes to Bitcoin mining companies. I’ve always believed that going public is a double-edged sword – on one hand, it can provide access to capital and increase visibility, but on the other hand, it forces a company to focus on short-term earnings and makes them vulnerable to takeovers and hostile bids.


Bitcoin has experienced a 7% increase in value over the past five days. This signifies a surge in Bitcoin mining activity. However, this trend will likely reverse once Bitcoin’s price declines by more than 5% within a five-day period, making mining less profitable.

The prices of the shares for the four largest publicly traded Bitcoin miners, as measured by their total computational power on the Bitcoin network, have experienced double-digit percentage point increases due to Bitcoin’s price rise.

Bitcoin Mining Is So Back (Except It's AI Now)
Among the five companies, Iris Energy Ltd (IREN) is the only one experiencing a setback, losing 15% of its value. This decline came after Culper Research released a report last week, revealing their short position on IREN. The bearish stance taken by Culper hinges on their belief that Iris Energy’s Childress, Texas site is not an ideal location for artificial intelligence (AI) or high-performance computing (HPC), based on their assessment.
Bitcoin mining may not appear connected to AI and High Performance Computing (HPC), but the mining industry has adopted these technologies as a profitable diversification. This is illustrated by Core Scientific’s (CORZ) recent 200-megawatt (MW) AI deal with CoreWeave, which significantly boosted CORZ’s stock price by approximately 40%.

As a crypto investor, I can imagine saying: “If Bitcoin’s price keeps climbing, Iren’s sites might no longer be unsuitable for generating revenue through Bitcoin mining. In such a scenario, the company could potentially redirect its resources back towards Bitcoin mining.”

To clarify, when someone says “bitcoin mining is so last year,” they’re actually referring to the revival of the Bitcoin mining stock sector instead. The overall Bitcoin network hash rate has only experienced a slight increase in the past five days, from 663.618 exahashes per second (Eh/s) to 668.659 Eh/s, which is less than the anticipated 7% rise. Keep in mind that there isn’t a definitive hash rate data point. This lag in response from hash rate to Bitcoin price growth benefits publicly-traded mining companies.

If you delve deeper into the Bitcoin mining narrative and examine what mining corporations are expressing in interviews or public records, you’ll notice that although they remain committed to Bitcoin mining, they frequently discuss various unrelated or only loosely connected topics.

AI, or High-Performance Computing
Here’s a splashy headline: Private Equity Giants Are Circling Bitcoin Miners on AI Allure

And another: Core Scientific Upgraded to Buy From Neutral to Reflect HPC Expansion: B Riley

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed an increasing number of investors showing interest in the Bitcoin mining sector, following in the footsteps of Core Scientific’s recent deal. JPMorgan’s involvement is another notable addition to this trend.

Last week, I discussed the significant energy consumption of AI and Bitcoin. Surprisingly, it appears that Bitcoin mining operations can be easily adapted for the latest technological advancements, such as AI or High Performance Computing (HPC), without causing much controversy.
PE firms are now recognizing the worth of bitcoin miners due to the increasing need for data centers capable of powering AI machinery. (Will Canny and Aoyon Ashraf, CoinDesk)
According to JPMorgan’s findings, IREN – the company previously considered by Culper as not prepared for AI integration – appears to be in an advantageous position when it comes to taking full advantage of the resource-shifting trend.
As aanalyst, I’ve come across Will Foxley, the co-founder of Blockspace Media and the host of The Mining Pod, sharing his doubts about the feasibility of Bitcoin mining facilities transforming into platforms for artificial intelligence (AI) computing.
“Foxley expressed to CoinDesk that many Bitcoin miners are merely discussing the possibility of implementing AI, but in truth, they lack the capability to do so.”

Financial engineering-as-a-service

I’ve argued previously that taking a company public is not a wise decision for several reasons. One major concern is the need for businesses to adopt a short-term perspective, focusing on quarterly earnings reports instead of long-term objectives such as continuous growth or surviving the next decade. This shift can be detrimental as it may distract from important strategic decisions and goals that are essential for the company’s long-term success. Additionally, going public makes it harder to keep struggles or challenges hidden from the public eye, increasing vulnerability if a company is facing difficulties.

In 2022, mining companies faced numerous challenges, with Core Scientific (CORZ) filing for bankruptcy being one of the most notable setbacks. The upcoming Bitcoin halving in April 2024 further threatened miners’ revenue prospects by reducing their rewards per block. This situation put many mining companies in a precarious position, making it easier for competitors like Riot Platforms (RIOT) to identify struggling businesses.

As a seasoned investor with a keen interest in technology and finance, I’ve seen my fair share of companies scrambling to grow and stay competitive in their respective industries. One strategy that has caught my attention is the pursuit of strategic acquisitions, particularly when it comes to tech firms eyeing established players in other sectors.

“Foxley believes that some Bitcoin companies possess lucrative energy contracts. For a large-scale data center operator like Coreweave, purchasing a Bitcoin mining site and transforming it into an AI data center could be a worthwhile investment, despite the high cost. The long-term benefits of the power contract are expected to outweigh the expenses, considering the premium as a public AI company and the revenue generated solely from operating as an AI business.”
Coreweave surely cannot be the only AI company thinking this.

Mining other coins

Prior to Ethereum‘s transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, mining companies focused on extracting ether. However, since this shift occurred, these firms now exclusively mine Bitcoin instead.

Most people believed that Marathon (MARA) had only been engaged in mining Bitcoin or other well-known cryptocurrencies until September 2023, when the company unexpectedly disclosed its involvement with Kaspa. This relatively unknown crypto is essentially random and mineable, making it an intriguing yet unconventional choice for Marathon. The company had the necessary resources – space and electricity – to explore this opportunity, and given its profitability, it seemed logical for them to pursue it. After all, profitable endeavors are generally beneficial.

“Through the process of extracting Kaspa, Marathon generates a source of income that differs from Bitcoin and is linked to our essential skills in managing digital asset computations,” stated Adam Swick, Marathon’s chief growth officer.

In my opinion, the mining of Kaspa and possibly other coins isn’t indicative of a significant industry transformation yet, as I believe it’s unlikely that another proof-of-work cryptocurrency will gain substantial popularity.

Marathon’s action underlines a more significant issue: Bitcoin miners are struggling with revenue and profitability, leading them to explore alternatives beyond just mining Bitcoin to compensate.

As a seasoned writer and editor with extensive experience in the cryptocurrency industry, I want to emphasize that the perspectives shared in this article are my own and do not necessarily align with those of CoinDesk or its affiliates. My journey into the world of digital assets has been both exciting and enlightening, and I look forward to continuing to explore and learn from this dynamic field. However, it is important to remember that individual viewpoints can vary widely within the industry, making open-mindedness and respectful dialogue essential components of any meaningful discourse on cryptocurrency and its potential impact on our global economy.

Read More

2024-07-18 22:30