A Survivor Contestant Perfectly Explained What The New Era Is Missing (And How To Fix It)

Fans of *Survivor* are hoping for a fresh direction. Online and in reviews, it’s clear many viewers are tired of seeing the same problems repeat – like a struggling tribe consistently losing before the merge. They’re also ready for a different format than the standard three tribes, and they’d like to see more compelling and antagonistic players. I agree – it’s time for something new! Luckily, a former player has proposed a solution that could address all of these concerns at once.

Sam Phalen, a popular contestant from *Survivor 47* who finished in second place, recently joined Phil Wood on The Survivor Specialists podcast to discuss *Survivor 49*. They talked about the possibility of three tribes, and Sam offered a really insightful explanation of why that format can be challenging.

He explained that the absence of strong dislike stems from the competition setup. When you’re constantly battling just one other group, you start to really dislike them and strong rivalries develop – it feels like a direct ‘us versus them’ situation. However, when you’re competing against two other groups, that personal animosity doesn’t have a chance to build up.

Here’s a portion of Sam’s really thoughtful observation based on personal experience…

It never felt like we were competing *against* another tribe, but rather struggling with our own internal issues. I never focused on personal revenge or trying to take someone down individually. It was always about recognizing our own mistakes as a team. I believe the traditional tribal setup – us versus them – fosters strong team spirit and naturally creates fun, individual rivalries within challenges, which is something I’d really like to see happen again.

It’s generally been thought that the current season of the show feels more upbeat because the contestants are mostly huge fans who are thrilled just to participate, rather than intensely focused on winning the prize. I, like many others, believed this explained the lack of strong conflict between the teams, but I think Sam has a valid point that changes that understanding.

It’s likely a mix of personal feelings and how competition works. When facing just one rival, it’s easy to focus on them and see them as the enemy. But when competing against many opponents, it becomes more about challenging yourself and trying to outperform everyone else.

Honestly, I’d love to see two tribes again! It would open the door for those really raw, physical challenges we haven’t seen much of lately. Remember *Heroes Vs Villains*? Coach manhandling Colby, or Sandra playfully messing with Sugar? That’s what *Survivor* should be – a tough, primal battle for survival, not just a strategic game played nicely on a fancy set. It needs to feel more intense and less like a polite board game.

This season of *Survivor* is shaping up to be a disaster for one of the tribes. All four players voted out so far have been from the same tribe, and they’re still struggling with basic survival – they haven’t even managed to make fire! This is the fourth time in the last five seasons that a tribe has been consistently dominated from the very beginning.

Both of the other tribes followed a very similar plan before the merge. Each quickly formed a shaky alliance of four players, all united by simply wanting to avoid elimination. We’ve heard a lot from the players about who’s in and who’s on the outs, but it’s a familiar situation. There also hasn’t been much competition between the tribes. In fact, the winning tribe barely celebrated after the latest challenge, feeling sympathy for the losing tribe.

I’m a big fan of *Survivor*, even though it’s not always perfect. However, I think the show needs a refresh. I’d love to see more conflict, different strategies before the merge, and a more balanced game. Ultimately, I want a season that feels like classic *Survivor*, and I agree with Sam that bringing back the two-tribe format would be the best way to achieve that, as it naturally creates a strong ‘us versus them’ dynamic.

Read More

2025-10-14 22:10