As a seasoned researcher with a keen interest in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, I find the recent approval of FTX’s bankruptcy plan by the U.S. court to be an intriguing development. Having closely followed the turbulent journey of FTX since its collapse, it’s heartening to see some semblance of justice being served, albeit in a complex and nuanced manner.


On Monday, a U.S. court gave the green light to FTX’s bankruptcy plan. This means that most of the crypto exchange’s customers are expected to receive more than their losses from 2022, in terms of equivalent value.

The approved bankruptcy plan, a revised version filed in September, for the FTX estate has been confirmed by 96% of voting creditors in terms of headcount and 98% based on total value. According to this plan, customers can anticipate cash repayments that equate to an average of 118% of their holdings’ value at the time FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. Some may even receive up to 140%, as stated by lawyers for the estate on Monday. Although this surpasses what creditors anticipated two years ago, these funds won’t compensate for the growth Bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies experienced during FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings.

During a six-hour-long court hearing, Judge John T. Dorsey from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of Delaware listened to creditor arguments about lingering issues with the plan, such as objections from companies like Celsius and Layer Zero, as well as individual creditors (some represented by lawyers, some acting independently) who raised concerns over the estate’s choice to repay creditors in cash rather than crypto distributions, the evaluation of FTT tokens (valued at zero according to the estate), and the alleged property rights they claim from FTX’s terms of service. Dorsey ultimately dismissed all these objections.

Although there was extensive debate during the hearing regarding the perceived worthlessness of the FTT token, its price surged by 55% following Dorsey’s endorsement of FTX’s bankruptcy proposal.

On Monday, Brian Glueckstein, an attorney representing the FTX estate and a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell, contended that the true value of the FTT tokens held by creditors should actually be considered as nothing, and there is no justification for altering this determination.

Experts clarified that the Functional Token Token (FTT) doesn’t inherently hold any worth. It only serves a purpose within a functioning FTX.com trading platform, according to Glueckstein. Moreover, he emphasized that there will be no revival or re-launch of the FTX.com exchange.

The argument that “property rights” claims, such as creditors wanting their investments returned in cryptocurrency instead of cash or being entitled to other property within the estate, were rejected. This decision came after FTX’s legal team and expert witnesses, including Edgar Mosley from Alvarez and Marsal consulting firm, testified that it was impractical for the estate to return crypto holdings in-kind due to a lack of available assets.

The repayment capacity of the exchange is attributable to several factors:

It was pointed out that buying the exact quantity of cryptocurrency due to creditors from the open market, considering current market values, is an impractical task, a view shared by lawyers. Dorsey agreed with this assessment.

Despite ruling out direct crypto distributions, lawyers representing the FTX estate have expressed interest in offering stablecoin distributions as an alternative to creditors, and confirmed ongoing negotiations with at least four potential partners for execution. However, it’s important to note that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has expressed reservations about this element of the repayment strategy.

Read More

2024-10-08 00:05