As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the volatile digital asset market, I find the recent survey by ConsenSys and HarrisX both enlightening and concerning. It’s heartening to see that nearly half of U.S. voters recognize the importance of a pro-crypto stance when choosing political candidates, and I share their sentiments wholeheartedly.


According to a recent poll conducted by ConsenSys and HarrisX, approximately 49% of American voters prioritize a candidate’s support for cryptocurrency when making their electoral decisions.

Furthermore, around two out of three individuals expressed their readiness to overlook political affiliations for a candidate advocating for pro-cryptocurrency legislation.

Crypto Regulation and Voter Sentiment

The research additionally revealed that an overwhelming majority of 85% of participants expressed a desire for potential presidential candidates to explicitly state their stance on digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These results imply that parties acknowledging this concern might secure a substantial number of votes in the fiercely competitive election.

Participants in the survey shared worries regarding the existing crypto regulations, as 44% of them indicated that they believe the current Biden administration isn’t taking sufficient steps to aid the industry. Moreover, an impressive 78% of respondents expressed their readiness to back politicians who prioritize shielding users from potential crypto frauds.

As a researcher reporting on Joe Lubin’s recent remarks, I can share his perspective: “I, Joe Lubin, CEO of ConsenSys and co-founder of Ethereum, have made it clear that the misconception exists that the crypto sector resists regulation. However, this is far from the truth.” He emphasized the need for greater regulatory clarity, underlining the significance of cryptocurrency as a non-partisan concern. “For too long,” he stated, “we’ve been operating in a state of regulatory ambiguity, and it’s high time we address this issue for the betterment of all parties involved.

As a researcher delving into the realm of digital assets, I’ve uncovered an intriguing finding: there seems to be widespread confusion among voters regarding the U.S. regulatory body overseeing this sector. Shockingly, only 15% correctly identified the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as the regulator, while a mere 4% pointed to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). A significant portion, 11%, believed it was the U.S. Treasury Department’s responsibility, and another 11% thought the industry was self-regulating. This underscores a pressing need for improved education and clarity on this topic.

In response to a question about which regulatory bodies have sufficient knowledge to establish cryptocurrency policies, 70% of respondents picked the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), while 67% also supported the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Political Figures’ Crypto Knowledge

The research additionally explored public opinions regarding American politicians’ comprehension of cryptocurrency. It was found that former President Donald Trump was perceived as the most informed, with approximately half (53%) of participants expressing confidence in his understanding of the field, sufficient to formulate suitable policies. This figure is notably higher than the 41% who endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris on this topic and the 36% who felt similarly about President Joe Biden.

Currently, people are urging for more transparent rules and robust safeguards against fraud and consumer exploitation in the realm of cryptocurrencies. This demand for reassurance is echoed consistently among crucial swing states.

Fraud prevention is another top concern for voters of all political affiliations, with Democrats and crypto owners pushing for greater transparency. Independents, meanwhile, prioritize clearer regulatory guidelines.

Generally speaking, the primary concern preventing people from investing in cryptocurrencies is the perceived high level of risk. The study proposes that providing guarantees might help shift voters’ opinions.

Read More

2024-10-05 18:46