• A federal court in Texas decided Consensys’ recent lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission wasn’t warranted, because it’s underlying legal danger had ceased.
  • Consensys is still in a legal battle with the U.S. securities regulator over MetaMask.

As a seasoned crypto investor with years of experience navigating the complex and ever-changing landscape of digital assets, I must say that this latest development between Consensys and the SEC has piqued my interest. While it’s always disheartening to see companies like Consensys embroiled in legal battles, it’s a part of the game when dealing with regulatory bodies.


Initially, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had included ConsenSys on a list of subjects for cryptocurrency investigation. This action led ConsenSys, a technology incubator company, to file a lawsuit against the SEC in federal court, claiming excessive reach. However, since the SEC recently closed its Ethereum probe this year, a judge in Texas has determined that there is no immediate risk, making the lawsuit unnecessary.

In simpler terms, Judge Reed O’Connor stated in a recent court filing that as there seems to be minimal or no immediate harm (hardship) for ConsenSys, the case does not yet have enough substance or an ongoing conflict to warrant his consideration at this time.

As an analyst, I can share that we’ve experienced a substantial industry victory following the submission of our legal action. Remarkably, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has decided to terminate its investigation into ‘Ethereum 2.0’. In a recent court ruling in Texas, it was acknowledged that the relief sought by ConsenSys on this pivotal issue for the Ethereum ecosystem had already been granted by the SEC.

ConsenSys contended that their lawsuit exposed an excessively aggressive probe into Ethereum by the SEC, causing policymakers and the general public to express significant worry about the SEC’s examination of blockchain software development.

The SEC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the case being dismissed.

In April, when Consensys filed a lawsuit, it requested the court to rule that Ethereum’s ether (ETH) isn’t considered a security. It argued that any probe of ConsenSys on the basis that the token is a security would infringe upon the company’s rights. Furthermore, Consensys asserted that MetaMask doesn’t fall under federal broker classification and that its staking service doesn’t contravene securities law.
Following their retreat from the ETH probe, the SEC indeed pursued charges against ConsenSys at a later date in June. They claimed that ConsenSys’ MetaMask service functioned as an unlicensed securities broker.
Although the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to publicly clarify Ethereum’s (ETH) standing, it recently resolved allegations against eToro, enabling the trading platform to keep offering ETH within the United States.

Read More

2024-09-20 19:10