As a researcher with a background in finance and experience in following regulatory developments in the cryptocurrency industry, I find the BitMEX case deeply concerning. The exchange’s failure to comply with essential regulatory requirements, such as implementing an adequate KYC and AML program, poses significant risks to the financial system’s integrity.


On Wednesday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) revealed that BitMEX has admitted to breaking the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) in a court proceeding.

Based on recently unveiled court records, the transaction neglected to establish a robust know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) procedure between September 2015 and September 2020.

BitMEX’s Guilty Plea

As an analyst, I would rephrase it as follows: During this timeframe, I have identified that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) accused the platform of providing U.S. residents with unlawful crypto derivative trading services. Furthermore, the Department of Justice (DOJ) brought charges against four employees of the exchange for allegedly breaching the Bank Secrecy Act.

As a researcher uncovering information about BitMEX, I’ve discovered that the company’s founders and a long-term employee confessed in a U.S. federal court in 2022 that they ran this prominent global cryptocurrency derivatives platform from 2015 to 2020 without implementing adequate anti-money laundering measures, as mandated by American law.

Williams pointed out that the use of BitMEX could facilitate large-scale money laundering and sanctions evasion activities, posing a significant risk to the financial system’s stability.

Christie M. Curtis, the Acting Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI, expressed similar thoughts when she noted, “BitMEX disregarded necessary anti-money laundering protocols by permitting weak access credentials for their services. This deliberate action, aimed at boosting their revenue, not only put them out of compliance with national regulations but also exposed the US financial markets to illicit transactions and actors.”

In 2014, the cryptocurrency trading platform BitMEX was established by the trio consisting of Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, and Samuel Reed. The company’s initial team member, Gregory Dwyer, came on board as an employee and later assumed the role of Head of Business Development in 2015.

As a researcher investigating this case, I’ve discovered that the charges levied against the three co-founders and Dwyer in 2020, which they all previously admitted to, bear striking resemblance to the charge BitMEX has now confessed to. These charges revolve around the company’s operations during the same time frame.

As a researcher, I would express it this way: I’m here to share some insights regarding an ongoing case. The U.S. Attorney’s Office’s Illicit Finance and Money Laundering Unit will be overseeing the prosecution. Two of the company’s co-founders are looking at a potential five-year prison term if found guilty.

Regulatory Violations

Based on court records and testimonies, BitMEX, a cryptocurrency trading platform, allegedly catered to American traders and maintained offices in the United States. Consequently, it was obligated to register with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and instate a robust Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program. The implementation of such measures is crucial to safeguard financial institutions from falling prey to unlawful activities.

According to the court records, BitMEX’s top brass deliberately bypassed the application of American regulations, including AML and KYC protocols, acknowledging their importance. The cryptocurrency exchange merely demanded an email address from clients to utilize their platform.

As a researcher, I’ve uncovered evidence indicating that senior executives were conscious of the fact that US citizens persisted in employing BitMEX’s trading platform up until at least 2018. Furthermore, it came to light that the previously implemented measures to hinder such activities were insufficient and could be circumvented with ease.

The firm deceived a bank regarding the role of one of its affiliates, enabling the shifting of huge sums of money through the American banking network.

Read More

2024-07-11 11:28