As a researcher with a background in financial regulation and blockchain technology, I find the SEC’s lawsuit against Consensys and MetaMask concerning, especially given my understanding of the complexities involved in the crypto market and its regulatory landscape.
The SEC, or United States Securities and Exchange Commission, has filed a legal action against ConsenSys, the overseeing organization of MetaMask, alleging they’ve been facilitating staking and brokerage services for unregistered securities contracts.
As a crypto investor, I’d put it this way: On June 28th, a lawsuit was filed against ConsenSys alleging that they breached federal securities laws. Specifically, they didn’t register as a broker and failed to register the offer and sale of certain securities. This means that investors were denied important protections that these laws provide.
Consensys has been accused of functioning as an unregistered broker for crypto asset securities since October 2020 via its MetaMask Swaps service. Over the past four years, they have reportedly amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in fees from this alleged operation, despite putting investors at risk.
Starting from January 2023, Consensys, the company behind MetaMask, reportedly carried out unregistered securities sales and functioned as an unlicensed broker through its crypto asset staking program. The SEC alleges that Consensys amassed over $250 million in fees by performing these activities under the MetaMask Staking service.
ALSO READ: US SEC Can No Longer Turn to In-House Tribunals
MetaMask’s integration of Lido and Rocket Pool’s Ethereum liquid staking services is under scrutiny by the SEC, as these services are viewed as unregistered securities offerings. This is because investors put their ETH into these platforms with the belief that they will earn profits, which is largely dependent on the management efforts of Lido and Rocket Pool respectively.
As a crypto investor, I understand that the SEC’s concern stems from the fact that certain liquid staking applications, which are not registered with them, have been integrated into MetaMask. The SEC believes it has the authority to take legal action against Consensys for allegedly acting as a broker/dealer of unregistered securities. In April, Consensys received a Wells Notice from the SEC. In response, they filed a lawsuit against the regulator, stating, “The SEC’s ongoing campaign against crypto is driven by selective enforcement and an attempt to extend its jurisdiction beyond established legal boundaries.”
Consensys was expecting the SEC to sue it.
Image by Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. https://Terms.Law from Pixabay
Read More
- PENDLE PREDICTION. PENDLE cryptocurrency
- W PREDICTION. W cryptocurrency
- FIO PREDICTION. FIO cryptocurrency
- AAVE PREDICTION. AAVE cryptocurrency
- BONE PREDICTION. BONE cryptocurrency
- WALV PREDICTION. WALV cryptocurrency
- Bitcoin’s Unreliable Death Cross Is Looming Again
- Did the Megalopolis Trailer Make Up All Those Movie-Critic Quotes?
- Ethereum Suffers $61M Outflows, Worst Performance Since August 2022
- Decoding the Cosmic Conundrum in Honkai: Star Rail – Why So Serious?
2024-07-01 23:37