Vitalik Buterin Reveals the Secret to When Rollups Should Go Decentralized (Spoiler: It’s Not Right Now)

by

So, Vitalik Buterin, the Ethereum co-founder (you know, that guy who’s basically the wizard behind Ethereum), has decided to grace us with some wisdom about when rollup-based layer-2 platforms should *actually* go decentralized. And—plot twist—it’s not as simple as “as soon as possible.” Who would’ve thought? 🙄

In a post on May 5, Buterin casually explained that there’s a perfect time for rollup scalability solutions to switch to decentralization. Apparently, this moment depends on when the failure probability of the proof system is low enough to outweigh the risks of centralization. Well, that’s… helpful? 😂

Buterin’s post came after some *spicy* commentary from Daniel Wang, the founder and CEO of decentralized exchange Loopring. Wang shared a thread stating that the maturity of a system is essential for security. “Not all code is created equal,” he mused, making us all feel like amateurs at coding. 😅

“A rollup can be Stage 2, but running fresh code that’s never been tested under real stress.”

Just to make it clearer: Rollup development has stages. Yes, stages. You can think of it as a “decentralization graduation.” Stage zero is the baby steps, stage one is slightly better, and stage two is the *fully decentralized, trustless* nirvana. If only our relationships had stages, right? 😆

Code That’s Survived The Crypto Battlefield

Cryptocurrency systems are, unfortunately, like your high school exams. They attract bad actors from all over the world looking to profit. No, not your annoying classmate trying to cheat, but actual hackers trying to exploit vulnerabilities. These guys don’t need a bug bounty program. They just want to break things for fun (and profit). 😜

This threat is increasing as bad actors are getting more creative, some even with the backing of nation-states. You know, no biggie. One such example is the infamous Lazarus hacking group, responsible for stealing billions. No, really. BILLIONS. 💸

Wang proposed a fun new concept: introducing a “BattleTested” badge. This would go to rollups that have managed to secure at least $100 million in assets for at least six months. If a rollup survives attacks for that long, it’s basically the crypto equivalent of winning a gold medal in the hacking Olympics. 🏅 But here’s the kicker: If the code gets updated, it loses its “BattleTested” badge until it proves itself again. Just like your last New Year’s resolution to work out…until it’s forgotten by March. 😜

“A good reminder that stage 2 is not the only thing that matters for security: the quality of the underlying proof system matters too.”

Dominick John, an analyst at Kronos Research, chimed in to remind everyone that decentralization isn’t just about coolness points. It’s about understanding the risks and weaknesses of the system. Think of it like a risky game of Jenga—don’t let the wrong piece fall out. “When the locked value crosses $100 million, then maybe we should start thinking about risks,” he said. You know, just a casual $100 million. No big deal. 🙄

“The real green light for decentralization comes not when the proof system looks good on paper, but when it proves under real economic pressure that it’s more reliable than the potential for coordinated failures among council members.”

So When Should You Decentralize? Asking for a Friend

According to Buterin, the perfect time to decentralize is when the proof system is secure enough that keeping things centralized becomes a bigger risk. Because, surprise! Adding more decentralization when you’re not ready might actually make things worse. Who knew? 🙄

Ethereum

Mike Tiutin, the CTO at PureFi, also warned that decentralizing too soon could leave users open to some not-so-fun surprises. John agreed, pointing out that rushing to stage two is like putting ideology before safety. And that, my friends, is a recipe for disaster. 😬

“In stage one, councils can step in if something breaks. In Stage 2, a single bug could wipe out billions with no rollback.”

But, oh wait, there’s more! Experts are also warning that not decentralizing at all is its own problem. Arthur Breitman, co-founder of the Tezos blockchain, reminded everyone that “prominent Ethereum L2s” are still mostly custodial. So, if you trust these privileged entities to never collude, you’re basically playing a game of crypto Russian roulette. 💥

“Privileged entities control core logic, jeopardizing asset integrity; banking on their immunity to collusion is fragile, and failure is likely to be correlated.”

Read More

2025-05-05 13:17