Thinking Man’s Valorant: Analyzing 100T vs KRU

As a long-time Valorant gamer with years of experience under my belt, I’ve seen my fair share of close matches that could have gone either way. Today, I want to share my thoughts on 100 Thieves’ game against KRU and the missed opportunities and questionable decisions made by their players.


Today’s discussion will center around the Valorant clash between 100 Thieves and KRU. This analysis video highlights key rounds, scrutinizing missed chances and debatable player moves. It’s a tight contest with significant consequences – 100 Thieves missing out on Champs as a result.

If you enjoy this content, consider subscribing to Thinking Man’s Valorant’s YouTube channel!

Key Takeaways:

  • The game between 100 Thieves and KRU was a closely contested match.
  • KRU consistently used fade utility and set up defensive traps to control the map.
  • 100 Thieves failed to adapt to KRU’s changing strategies and missed opportunities to exploit weak areas of the map.
  • Bang, a player for 100 Thieves, never took the initiative to lurk towards the A site, which could have made a significant impact on rounds.

Missed Opportunities and Questionable Decisions

During the examined matches, KRU consistently employed the fade ability for weakening their opponents and fortified defensive barriers near the A site. However, 100 Thieves seemed oblivious to the vulnerability on the opposite side of the map and neglected initiating an attack at A.

In round 9, I noticed that KRU shifted their approach and concentrated more players at B site instead of their standard strategy. It seemed like a great opportunity for Bang from 100 Thieves to capitalize on the absence of enemy utility at A, but unfortunately, he missed the mark, showing a lack of situational awareness. The same situation repeated itself in round 12, with 100 Thieves falling into the trap set by KRU once again.

In simpler terms, during the Valorant match between Thinking Man and 100 Thieves, it was noticeable that the players from 100 Thieves, with Bang being a notable example, consistently hesitated to move towards key areas (A) and instead opted for safer positions. This reluctance to change tactics and take risks proved detrimental, ultimately leading to the loss for 100 Thieves.

Read More

2024-07-20 17:15