The Genius Act’s Wild Side: Could Stablecoins Be Uncle Sam’s Undoing? 🤔💸

by

Out in the world where men wear worn-out boots and the dollar dreams of empire, the folks at Amundi—Europe’s asset-managing bigwigs—looked across the Atlantic, squinted into the haze of legislation, and let out a laugh laced with worry. “There’s this GENIUS Act,” they said, “and it could be about as genius as pouring milk on a rattlesnake.”

Vincent Mortier, the investment chief at Amundi, leaned on the fence with Reuters and said, “It could be genius. Or it could be evil.” (He probably wrung his hat as he said it, imagining a future where money and mischief dance a two-step together.)

See, America’s always liked to keep its dollar polished and shiny—first in line, king of the hill, apple of everyone’s global eye. Stablecoins, Mortier reckoned, used to appear as the trusty steed to keep King Dollar atop his throne. “But,” he warned, “push ‘em too hard and you craft a rival—something new with as much dollar in its veins as the dollar itself, but nimbler, less loyal, and twice as likely to run off with a stranger at the first scent of weakness.”

By forcing these stablecoins to be padded with real assets, the GENIUS Act almost shouts, “Trust us! Really, please!” So folks wonder: If the dollar’s so untouchable, why chain it up this tight? Mortier, reaching for the last potato in the stew, warned: “The dollar might look strong on the outside, but laws like these could show folks there are cracks in the hull.”

That’s not all. With these new rules, the companies doing the coin-wrangling could suddenly look a whole lot like banks, only without velvet ropes and stale coffee in the lobby. “Quasi-banks,” Mortier mused, “as if that ever ends well.” Something always goes sideways. “Potentially destabilize the global payment system,” he prophesied, which nobody wants—not even New York bankers with nerves tougher than old leather.

Stablecoins, RWAs and the US GENIUS Act

After the US Senate gave the GENIUS Act a tip of the hat on June 17, the law sauntered off to the House, like a wild horse looking for greener pastures (or more red tape). The plan: wrangle stablecoins, tie them up with neat requirements, and hope nobody asks too many questions about the knots.

Turns out, folks like Apple, Google, and that X fella, Elon Musk (he’s always got a rocket in his pocket), are sniffing around, wondering if maybe they ought to mint their own stablecoins. Every tech titan wants a shiny coin in his own likeness. Talk about everyone wanting a piece of the pie when the oven’s still hot.

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary and possibly a man who dreams in spreadsheets, stared out toward 2030 and declared stablecoins could balloon to $3.7 trillion. Maybe he grinned, maybe he winced—it’s hard to tell from a spreadsheet. 🤷‍♂️

Meanwhile, stablecoins keep multiplying like rabbits in spring—doubling since 2023, now tipping $250 billion. JPMorgan’s wise heads think this herd will double again soon, spillin’ out of their digital pens and over the blockchain plains.

Stablecoins, for all their digital slickness, are rooted in “real-world assets”—bonds, cash, the usual suspects. They’re real enough, but still prone to wandering off if nobody’s watching the gate.

Abdul Rafay Gadit, who once worked for Standard Chartered before chasing crypto dreams, figures the GENIUS Act could juice not just the stablecoins, but all the tokenized goodies: real estate, trade finance, sukuks (for those who like a little halal-mint in their portfolio). “You want compliant platforms, sure,” Gadit said, like a man promising rain after a long drought. “Just don’t ask what’s in the clouds.”

If there’s a moral here—other than ‘every coin has two faces’—it’s that you can lead a dollar to the blockchain, but you can’t make it stable. And in the end, maybe the world loves a little chaos… especially if it’s backed 1:1 with U.S. Treasurys. 💵🤠

Read More

2025-07-03 19:40