Smite 2 Currency Depreciation: The Community Reacts to Skyrocketing Skin Prices

As a lifelong fan of Smite who has spent countless hours and dollars supporting this game, I find myself utterly dismayed by the recent currency changes in Smite 2. The introduction of diamonds was initially met with excitement, but the soaring prices of skins have left me feeling like I’ve been robbed blind by a bandit wearing a Hi-Rez Studios mask.


The classic game Smite has been cherished by MOBA enthusiasts for quite some time, but the revised monetary systems in Smite 2 have triggered heated discussions among gamers. A post from user Xeo_Switchblade has stirred worry regarding skin prices, particularly focusing on the “Lunar Hex” skin priced at “1300 Diamonds + 1300 Legacy Gems.” Given that legacy gems have a direct exchange rate to the fresh diamond currency, players are doubting if this apparent surge of diamonds is merely a sly trick that favors developers over dedicated fans. To summarize, this post explores the intricacies of these currency modifications and echoes the community’s divided sentiments, as many users voice their discontent over what they perceive as steep devaluation of their in-game money.

Smite 2 Currency Depreciation
byu/Xeo_Switchblade inSmite

Summary

  • Players were initially excited about the introduction of diamonds but quickly became disillusioned when skin prices soared.
  • The inflation of skins has made legacy gems feel almost worthless, leaving many players disappointed.
  • The debate centers around whether the price hike will drive away new players and harm the game’s longevity.
  • Despite frustrations, some players see the business side of this decision and understand the developers’ motivations.

The Shock of Price Inflation

In essence, the sentiment among the community can frequently be understood by reading the comments on Xeo_Switchblade’s post, as a variety of opinions resonate broadly. User MadChance1210 encapsulated the widespread discontent when they said, “I was initially supportive of the gem change to diamonds, but this is an excessive increase.” This statement reflects the overall feeling of shock and dissatisfaction about the pricing overhaul. Many users miss the straightforwardness of the old currency system, where skins had a consistent value. The shift to a dual-currency system, designed to streamline things, has instead brought on more complexity and dismay. Previously content players now find their virtual possessions devalued, leading them to ponder if they truly received fair value for their investment.

Are Loyalty Rewards Becoming Useless?

Initially, the legacy gem system was met with positive responses from players, who were eager about its potential benefits. However, the uproar over inflated skin prices has led to a change of heart. Statements such as “Legacy gems are virtually useless if you also need another type of currency” capture the sentiment perfectly. Users like RexicTheKing have expressed similar sentiments, stating that the necessity of diamonds now makes legacy gems seem worthless and devoid of value. Players feel that the legacy gems they’ve earned through loyalty are as valuable as Monopoly money under the current pricing model. The simplicity and effectiveness of the previous system made it easy for enthusiasts to feel appreciated within the community, but this feeling is now being overshadowed by business tactics that prioritize profits over player satisfaction.

Community Effect: Retention vs. New Players

An important discussion that has arisen from this price inflation is whether it alienates new players. One user, Syntenyy, put it bluntly: “This is a very stupid decision if they plan on bringing new players to the game.” Like any game, new player retention is key to its longevity, and knee-jerk price increases often disadvantage newcomers. If older players find it hard to keep up with prices, what does that mean for fresh faces? The consensus among many commenters suggests that if price trends continue, they could scare off potential new players who are looking for an accessible and enjoyable experience. Players are vocal about this concern, fearing Smite 2 risks becoming an exclusive club where only the wealthiest players can afford to play at full tilt.

Understanding the Developers’ Decisions

Despite all the commotion, some commentators have been attempting to understand the thought process behind Hi-Rez Studios’ decisions, acknowledging that price adjustments could be warranted in specific situations. Dominix132 justifies the price increases as a complex strategy for harmonizing gameplay and earnings during the game’s developmental stages. Recognizing that core game mechanics significantly impact player interaction, some enthusiasts delve into the economic reasons behind these changes. However, even these fans express reservations about the significant increase in prices, stating, “asking almost 20 dollars for a single skin seems excessive.” While understanding the financial aspects of game production is essential, many players assert that achieving revenue goals should not compromise trust and goodwill within the community.

Essentially, the ongoing issue of currency depreciation in Smite 2 has sparked a broader debate among players concerning the game’s value and their loyalty. Across numerous discussions, players have shared similar concerns about expensive skin prices. However, it is clear that players have had an impact on past updates and changes within the game. Whether Hi-Rez Studios will respond to the widespread call for a more equitable currency system is yet uncertain. For now, the Smite community is expressing its dissatisfaction, hoping for meaningful improvements rather than more difficulties with currency.

Read More

2024-08-28 08:59