REVIEW: “Rebel Moon – Part One: Director’s Cut” (2024)

As a long-time admirer of Zack Snyder’s cinematic journey, I must say that his latest offering, “Rebel Moon”, is a testament to his unyielding passion and determination. From the initial pitch in 1997 to the final director’s cut on Netflix, it’s clear that this space opera has been a labor of love for Snyder.

The origins of Zack Snyder’s space opera “Rebel Moon” stretch back to the year 1997. Over time, Snyder presented his concept to LucasFilm as a possible new addition to the Star Wars series. Later, he endeavored to transform it into a video game and eventually contemplated creating it as a television show. He ultimately secured a deal with Netflix, albeit under terms that have thus far produced somewhat conflicting responses.

In this arrangement, Snyder was granted the liberty to fully materialize his concept for “Rebel Moon,” which included more extensive and R-rated explorations of his universe and its complex mythology, presented as director’s cuts. However, to secure approval, he consented to produce a tamed PG-13 version with the aim of attracting a larger, blockbuster audience. The two-part PG-13 adaptation garnered substantial viewership on Netflix but was generally panned by critics.

Discussing audience responses to Zack Snyder’s films can sometimes be tricky. Fans tend to fall into two distinct categories – those who are devoted admirers, appreciating anything he produces regardless of its merit, and others who mask their dislike, becoming visibly irritated even at the mention of his name, displaying a similar intensity in their criticism of his films as fervent Snyder supporters might for their favorite works. After sorting through all the commotion, the PG-13 production proved to be enjoyable. However, it was evidently only a fragment of something larger and potentially superior.

REVIEW: “Rebel Moon – Part One: Director’s Cut” (2024)

In the director’s cut of Snyder’s film, titled “Part One: Chalice of Blood,” a 70-minute extension is included. This expanded version follows much of the same narrative as its PG-13 counterpart, but offers additional depth to the overall storyline, redefines several character journeys, and infuses a darker tone through enhanced world development and heightened violence. Furthermore, Snyder’s sources of inspiration are more apparent and effectively utilized in this version. He has openly acknowledged that “Star Wars,” “Seven Samurai,” and “Heavy Metal” magazine were among his many inspirations. Here, these influences are clearer and better executed.

Among the strengths of “Chalice of Blood” is how it sheds much needed light on several characters and their stories. Chief among them is Jimmy (voiced by the great Anthony Hopkins), one of the last remaining members of a race of sentient robotic knights. In the shortened film version, very little about his character made sense. In this cut we see his journey of self-discovery as he searches for a new sense of purpose. We get to witness the evolution of Jimmy leading to him becoming one of the young franchise’s most compelling players.

In the story, Aris (Sky Yang), a young soldier from Imperium, receives more focus and depth as he aligns with the villagers on Veldt. This provides valuable context for his actions in the narrative. Admiral Atticus Noble (Ed Skrein) is portrayed as even more ruthless, displaying chilling loyalty to Motherworld in his cruel and psychopathic nature. The main character, Kora (Sofia Boutella), becomes more understandable as we delve deeper into her past through flashbacks, revealing the pain that motivates her actions. This time around, the flashback scenes are presented more effectively.

Regardless of its lengthy 3 hours and 24 minutes runtime, the film seems to attempt to tackle an expansive narrative scope, giving the impression that there is a wealth of untold stories remaining. For instance, the reasons behind each warrior’s decision to join Kora’s group are not fully fleshed out, leaving their motivations somewhat unclear. Their histories are hinted at rather than thoroughly explored, resulting in underdeveloped characters. However, Djimon Hounsou, Bae Doona, and Staz Nair deliver captivating performances despite having their individual backstories abbreviated.

Additionally, the film’s action sequences undergo a delightful transformation, becoming larger and more intense. Critics who dislike Snyder’s unique approach might scoff at these grand productions. However, his visual artistry is well-suited for these films and can even be considered refreshing. For instance, his frequent use of slow-motion stands out, especially in a time when many action scenes are difficult to follow due to excessive editing. Snyder’s style provides a satisfying, stylishly indulgent take on the action. Furthermore, there are no restrictions on violence in this movie. It is graphically depicted, sometimes extreme, but always exciting.

Viewing the director’s cut of “Rebel Moon” offers a more complete portrayal of Zack Snyder’s grand vision, with striking visuals, scenes that pack a stronger punch, and elevated stakes. However, some issues present in the PG-13 version persist, such as instances where the violence or sexual content seem excessive. Nevertheless, the director largely maintains his focus on building this rich and diverse world, delving deeper than before and providing a more immersive experience. The director’s cuts of “Rebel Moon” are now available for streaming on Netflix.

2024-08-05 17:56

REVIEW: “Rebel Moon – Part One: Director’s Cut” (2024)

Read More

Minority Mindset