Recently, speculation has been growing on Reddit about Nathan Fielder, the creator of HBO’s series “The Rehearsal.” Some users have proposed an intriguing theory: that behind his comedic persona, Fielder is secretly a skilled airplane pilot, capable of flying a Boeing 737 passenger jet. This is a significant claim, as these planes are much larger and more complex than those typically flown by recreational pilots. One Reddit user wrote on February 22nd, expressing excitement about the possibility: “If this is true and it’s featured on his show, I’ll be utterly amazed!” They also shared documents from a public FAA database, suggesting this could be a real secret in Fielder’s life. The user added: “It would require a tremendous amount of time and dedication over the years to keep this hidden for a prank. If it’s true, I hope it gets revealed and becomes part of his legend!
In the final episode of season two of The Rehearsal, it’s clear now that what was initially just a rumor wasn’t true. After navigating a complex journey involving unconventional psychological exploration aimed at enhancing aviation safety through improved pilot communication and mental health, we find out that Fielder had not only learned to fly but had advanced to becoming an actual 737 pilot. This involved piloting a jet carrying actor-passengers initially, followed by taking on professional ferry pilot roles, transporting planes across oceans for payment. In essence, he’s transformed into the type of individual whose actions originally inspired the project. This transformation was all in pursuit of making air travel slightly safer.
However, it’s worth noting that discerning truth from performance art in season two of The Rehearsal can be quite challenging, resembling a dizzying M.C. Escher staircase. Thankfully, I had the opportunity to clear up these matters during my recent two-hour chat with Fielder last week. In this conversation, Fielder admitted his deep interest in aviation and how he manages to find humor amidst the grim reality of plane crashes.
Away from the camera, Fielder is approachable, laid-back, open, and kind. He was more than happy to delve into the intricacies of aviation with me, an experienced aviation journalist. He also shared his fascinating journey in aviation, which began with a prolonged fascination for a Canadian plane-crash show, and may eventually culminate in Fielder testifying before Congress to advocate for new safety regulations. He’s even been working on a new joke to help him connect with lawmakers.
Thank you for sparing the time. I found the program simply amazing. I’ve actually penned a piece on it already. I’m not sure if you managed to read it yet. Well, I did take a peek at it!
To begin with, have you found any errors or points of disagreement in what I’ve presented? Given that you’ve investigated and discussed it, everything seems pertinent. However, I don’t claim to know everything, so I’d like to share some thoughts. The topic we’re discussing is on the aviation industry’s attention in some manner; they acknowledge this miscommunication occurs. Back in the ’70s, CRM (crew-resource management) was developed as a response or method to address it. However, the issue lies in the fact that the training is often just a brief PowerPoint presentation, which might make ineffective training worse than no training at all. Many people seem unconvinced of its significance – firstly, because they haven’t personally experienced such incidents; secondly, because they believe they would react appropriately in situations like those portrayed in the show, due to having received training for it.
Based on my extensive research and personal journey towards becoming a 737 pilot, I have a strong feeling that many individuals might not behave as they expect under such high-pressure situations. Moreover, these incidents occur more frequently than most people realize. While not always resulting in crashes, if the conditions align, it could be catastrophic. It’s remarkable how often we dodge crashes because it’s exceptionally rare for a single issue to cause one. Instead, it’s usually a confluence of multiple factors coming together, and if one link in this chain of events were to break…
Swiss cheese.What’d you say?
The “Swiss Cheese Model” refers to a scenario where multiple factors or conditions must align, just as holes in Swiss cheese must line up for an accident to occur. This is a useful analogy for understanding complex situations and I’ll definitely incorporate it into my explanations moving forward.
To summarize, simulators are essential because they allow individuals to practice and gain familiarity with situations or concepts before encountering them in real life, thereby reducing the time needed for processing and potentially preventing mistakes. Similarly, even experienced pilots may find themselves hesitant or uncomfortable in certain situations within a cockpit, but may write off these feelings as insignificant, justifying their actions by assuming they would react differently in more critical situations. However, it’s uncertain if that assumption is always accurate.
I’ve found that when it comes to doing something, especially creatively, it’s best to have a single objective and concentrate all your efforts on achieving it. If you manage to accomplish anything else along the way, that’s just a bonus. However, with this project, it seems like you started out with two goals that are completely unrelated or independent of each other. You have one goal, which you focus on…
Like a 90-degree angle. It’s like this [gestures with hands].
Oooh. So they’re not parallel.
… Perpendicular or orthogonal to one another? This term is often used to describe two things that are neither identical nor adversarial but have no direct relationship or interaction.
Yeah.It sounds like orthotic, like shoe orthotic.
Orthopedic? [Laughs.]
… “Orthogonal goals.”
In creating this comedy show for HBO, you’re faced with a unique challenge: on one side, you aim to produce something amusing for both the network and the audience. On the contrary, your ambition is also to address a serious safety issue that isn’t inherently humorous. For instance, in the first episode itself, you have dead bodies which aren’t funny on their own. This paradoxical task serves as the foundation for the entire project. When embarking on this season, were these two distinct objectives consciously in your mind from the start?
To me, taking on such a challenge is like putting myself in a difficult situation where I have to find a solution that I’m not entirely sure how to execute. Given the skepticism about my ability to be taken seriously, it would be an intriguing test if I could attempt to convey these important ideas authentically while still maintaining an entertaining tone. I believed this approach would result in a fresh, unique style we haven’t attempted yet.
As a film critic, let me tell you, the authenticity and gravity of this production truly resonate with me. Each scene depicts actual events, the tragic consequences of air mishaps, making every moment weighty and tense. However, as a storyteller, I sometimes find myself grappling with the balance between solemnity and levity. Given my background as an entertainment journalist, you might expect a consistent serious tone from me. But the truth is, humor is a natural part of my creative process. After prolonged periods without any comic relief, I can’t help but feel the need for some lightheartedness to keep things engaging and enjoyable.
Indeed, there’s a peculiar habit within me that might seem counterproductive, but it’s undeniably present. I find myself inadvertently undermining my own statements, often with humor in mind. However, it’s important to note that humor can serve as a powerful tool for idea dissemination; the funnier something is, the more likely it is to resonate with others.
So anyways. I don’t know. Orthological. What’s the word?
Currently, I’m struggling to recall the specific details, but if someone from Congress watches the show and decides to hold a genuine committee hearing based on it, I’d be more than happy to attend. Would that be alright?
Would you share an alternate joke instead of the one you practiced for the congressional hearing rehearsal? I found that one amusing because it seemed like a joke, and it might generate some laughter. By chance, I have another joke in mind… [Pauses] I’m sorry, but I can’t claim credit for this one. It was on a flight recently when the flight attendant asked me what I did, and I replied that I’m a comedian. She then asked me to come up with something funny, but at the time I couldn’t think of anything. However, I was brainstorming with someone else, so they came up with this: ‘What’s a pilot’s favorite bagel?’
I give up.Plane.
[Laughs] That’s quite amusing! It feels fresh and not overly rehearsed. I think it could be an excellent choice, especially considering the family-friendly environment. However, I’ve found that jokes with a softer tone can sometimes come across as too cheesy. Now, these are the thoughts running through my mind. As for using the word “masturbating,” I’m not sure if it’s entirely inappropriate, but I do want to ensure that the material is accessible and enjoyable for everyone.
The true humor in that particular scene lies in your genuine surprise at the actors’ uncontrollable laughter, which was over-the-top and amusing. However, what makes the rehearsals intriguing is that actors are accustomed to scripts and directions. But when it comes to an open-ended scenario, they’re often unsure of their actions without guidance. This uncertainty always presents a fun challenge during the show – figuring out how to generate authenticity in a fabricated environment.
In essence, when we discuss your question about Congress, would you advocate for the same things presented in our show or something new? John Goglia, who I’ve collaborated with and continue to engage regularly, strongly emphasizes the need for increased funding to delve deeper into this topic and explore potential solutions. Some may dismiss our conclusions and proposed remedies due to their apparent absurdity. However, it’s worth noting that what might seem funny or lame could actually be advantageous. If regulatory bodies like the FAA mandate seemingly odd measures, it can foster camaraderie among those obligated to comply. Reflecting on the early days of aviation, when people dismissed the idea as a joke, it’s clear that what was once considered amusing has now become commonplace.
Recently, I visited Japan and was captivated by their unique systems that cater to fundamental human needs – fulfillment and connection. These services don’t feel like commonplace occurrences, instead, they seem to address issues often overlooked in many societies. For instance, some workplaces offer environments where individuals are uplifted and praised excessively, boosting their self-esteem. Similarly, cafes exist for young rural women moving to Tokyo, providing a big sister figure who offers guidance on city living, socializing, and personal goals. While these practices may appear unusual from an external perspective, I believe they address deep-seated societal needs that are often unmet.
Do I sound like a lunatic?
It turns out that a significant number of pilots and air traffic controllers, as many as 67%, have expressed concerns about the potential negative impact on their job or career if they were to seek help for mental health issues, according to Kimberly Perkins’ ongoing research study. Kimberly is a 787 pilot with a Ph.D. in human-factors research, and her work is related to your show as she’s studying pilot emotional health. She has a survey going with over 1,700 participants so far, and it continues to grow. In the survey, one of the questions asks about the fear of career repercussions from using mental-health tools or seeking assistance.
It’s intriguing indeed, the topic discussed in your program is currently being researched, as we converse. The pilots we spoke with all confirmed this. Interestingly, it appears that the inability to express emotions without fear of being judged as emotionally unstable ties into communication about a wide range of subjects. This is because no one wants to appear to others as if their judgment is flawed or as if they might be under stress for something that they shouldn’t be stressed about, which could imply other things.
It’s an independent matter when considering the cockpit-communications issue specifically, but it’s interconnected in a broader sense. This point revolves around acknowledging pilots as individuals with their own human struggles that require creative solutions. The expectation for pilots to excel without error and appear flawless is incredibly high.
One reason I found this task appealing for this particular project is that nobody likes the idea of their pilot appearing strange, no matter how slightly. If you see something unusual, you might choose to dismiss it because your life depends on them. I believe pilots can sense this. Even after becoming a pilot myself and considering the nature of our show’s content, I felt compelled to avoid making light of any situation. This was due to my commitment to ensuring everyone understands the utmost importance I place on safety. As a result, I noticed a shift in my behavior around others because of this significant responsibility for their well-being.
For nearly two decades, I’ve been captivated by the intricate investigations following commercial-aviation accidents. The detail and thoroughness that goes into these probes has always amazed me, especially considering how planes often disintegrate upon impact. My initial thought was, “How can you uncover anything when debris is scattered everywhere? How could they possibly know what happened? How can they find the mechanical issue?” But what’s remarkable is that investigators meticulously search every square millimeter of land surrounding the crash site. They painstakingly locate and reconstruct every fragment of the plane, and more often than not, they can pinpoint the cause. Afterward, extensive adjustments are made globally within the aviation industry to prevent similar incidents from occurring again. Remarkably, these changes have proven effective; if you examine aviation history, you’ll see that certain types of crashes have become rare or nonexistent following specific events.
Despite numerous attempts to address it, there’s one persistent issue that continues to arise – the human factor and communication breakdown. Although a CRM system was implemented to improve communication, the problem persists in various subtle ways. This aspect tends to be overlooked during investigations due to other contributing factors leading to crashes. Because it isn’t solely responsible, it frequently receives a dismissive response such as, “We can only do so much about that.” In the series, we seem to challenge this notion by asking, “What if you could do more?
The coincidence is downright spooky, yet not entirely unexpected. Frankly, I find it surprising that there haven’t been more significant crashes given the nature of aviation. When a crash occurs, it’s tempting to think, “This is an outlier,” or “That pilot wasn’t skilled enough,” but the reality is that effective communication between pilots, no matter their experience level, can be the deciding factor in every flight. In this instance, a potential misunderstanding in the cockpit of a Black Hawk helicopter led to a collision. The report isn’t out yet, but it appears the instructor told the pilot to move back into her lane, and she didn’t respond. This crash occurred after our show was scheduled to air, marking the first fatal commercial air accident in 16 years. It’s a validation of sorts, but also leaves me with an uneasy feeling.
As an aviation enthusiast, I’d like to share an interesting aspect about cockpit interactions: there are no cameras allowed. This means the crew relies solely on verbal communication for analysis. While we’re all familiar with how much meaning is often conveyed nonverbally in everyday life, this isn’t something you can consider when studying cockpit conversations.
Since faces and expressions aren’t visible, a lot of the communication happens implicitly through silences or subtle cues that might not be immediately apparent. For instance, while a pilot might utter a word, the unspoken messages conveyed through looks or body language are lost in this context. This is because nonverbal communication isn’t typically factored into accident analysis.
Is it worth considering the installation of cockpit cameras to monitor pilot-to-pilot communication for safety reasons, despite potential privacy concerns?
Should we consider putting cameras in airplane cockpits as a means of ensuring safety due to potential miscommunication between pilots? This might be an issue thousands of times per day, but it could only be analyzed when accidents occur. However, since the audio is deleted if the plane doesn’t crash, we may not have any information about flights where communication was poor but no accident happened. Therefore, it might be beneficial to examine a small random sample of daily flights and assess their communication quality without pilots knowing which ones are being monitored. This way, we can ensure the safety of countless lives, even if it could cause some resistance from pilot unions.
Are there potential downsides to requiring people to engage in a minor activity, such as a discussion, even if they opt out, they still need to communicate why they’re not participating? This way, everyone would have to talk about it regardless, right?
Admittedly, I might be overstepping bounds, but it seems to me that they can’t help but recognize the fact that they don’t require whatever it is we’re discussing. Picture this: remember those early planes that appeared rather foolish? Well, once put into motion, they proved quite remarkable, didn’t they? So why not share a hearty chuckle or two? What’s the harm in finding levity even in serious situations? After all, isn’t laughter a shared human experience, devoid of stigma or judgment?
That’s a solid observation you’ve made. It’s not that I’m advocating for the absolute best method here, but rather suggesting we explore various possibilities and delve into some interesting findings.
When you’re engrossed in your show, it often leaves you questioning whether a moment is serious or a joke. I’d like to make clear that, despite the playful tone, this suggestion holds weight. By adopting these whimsical roles, we aim to tackle a genuine communication issue that may arise. It might seem unconventional, but if others question its validity, I haven’t found a more effective solution yet. The acting concept also serves as an excuse for awkward situations, such as “Oh, they told me to act this way.” However, it’s not the only method we’re aiming for in our show, What’s the balance between what is real and what is amusing? I find this intriguing because it combines humor with potential effectiveness. In the final episode, you can see that our communication in the cockpit wasn’t ideal, and it somewhat brought my co-pilot out of his shell.
Let me share some thoughts on your remarkable flight journey. Frankly, I was taken aback by the finale – my jaw dropped! I had assumed you were an accomplished pilot after 150 hours of solo flying, but then you disclosed your multi-engine and commercial ratings, not to mention your skills in piloting a 737. I find it astounding that you managed to amass the necessary hours for a full commercial pilot’s license while simultaneously creating hit TV shows. Could you kindly share some insights about your aviation story – what sparked your interest, and how long did it take you to reach this impressive milestone?
However, I must confess, I never had any ambition to become a pilot myself. The very thought is daunting. It also becomes apparent that many people drawn to this field are enthusiasts of cars and motorcycles with a deep understanding of engines. I was far from being one of them; I didn’t even grasp the basics of an engine, let alone its functions. I barely knew that it generated power, and my understanding of what “power” entailed was limited. I would put oil in my car without truly comprehending why, feeling somewhat uneducated about these matters.
Yet, when I conceived the recurring theme of communication issues between pilots leading to numerous accidents in my shows, I felt compelled to learn more about aviation – not just as a subject, but as an experience. Having only read about it, I yearned to understand what it truly feels like to be at the controls.
…so, I was examining accident reports because there’s a Canadian TV series that recreates aviation accidents and discusses their resolutions.
Mayday?
Mayday, yeah. You know that show?
I’ve been following it closely, so it’s possible that I’ve caught you on that program! By the way, I’m a big fan of Mayday. It was around this time that I noticed a recurring theme: Wow, this subject seems to pop up frequently, yet they don’t delve into it as the central topic. This prompted me to investigate further and even purchase books on the subject. Initially, I never considered it as material for a show. Instead, I found myself casually sharing information with others: “Did you know that this is a significant factor in many accidents?” People would often respond, “No, I had no idea.”
One day, while brainstorming ideas for more of The Rehearsal, the concept of pilots striving for perfection resonated with me, given its relevance to the show’s theme: the contrast between their human flaws and the need for perfection. This led me to ponder whether exploring this topic in the context of pilots’ personal lives, particularly their relationships, could provide interesting parallels with the communication aspects of their professional lives.
Initially, that served as my foundation for this endeavor. As you mentioned earlier about being a comedian, I felt an instant insecurity about my ability to pull it off because I worried pilots might perceive it as a joke or a mockery of their profession. I yearned to grasp the essence of pilot life, hoping that sharing this common ground would make conversations smoother; after all, I could say something like, “I’m also a pilot, and here’s my perspective on these matters.” As the episodes progressed, many of the pilots and I found ourselves bonding over our shared experiences. However, in the final edit, we concluded that saving this concept for later made for a more compelling narrative structure.
In our recent episode, we used the phrase “Two Years Earlier” as a reference to when I first embarked on this journey. To be precise, around January 2023, an idea sparked within me, and prior to discussing it with HBO, I initiated some flight training. A few months later, I presented my concept, sharing footage of my progress. What’s intriguing is that I was pushing myself to the limit, striving to accomplish this as swiftly as possible, and I was finding it incredibly challenging! It’s astounding how much pilots have to go through. The training is indeed very difficult, and the amount of knowledge required to obtain these licenses is truly immense, as we don’t delve into in our show.
Was there a specific milestone in your aviation journey that you aimed for, which you felt was essential for the project to reach its full potential? For me, that milestone was achieving my private pilot, instrument, and commercial licenses. The title “commercial pilot” had an allure to it, even though many people are unaware that it doesn’t necessarily allow one to fly large aircraft; it simply signifies that you can get paid for flying.
It posed quite a challenge, indeed. The process involved considerable effort, with some maneuvers that were extremely demanding. Initially, it consumed a significant portion of my time during the early stages of production. Balancing shoots and training sessions was no easy feat, as I can attest. It ranks among the toughest tasks I’ve taken on. [Laughs]
As a seasoned moviegoer who’s had my fair share of cockpit experiences through my commercial pilot license, I must say, the plot twist in this film was as intricate as maneuvering a 737. It’s not just about knowing how to fly; it’s about knowing the nuances, the loopholes if you will, that define the culture of aviation. The rules and regulations are there for a reason, and understanding them is crucial to navigate through the skies successfully, or in this case, within the cinematic world.
Initially, when I proposed the idea of piloting a 737, many people considered it impossible. However, upon closer examination, I found technical rules that suggested it could be done. Yet, there are additional regulations and considerations related to large-scale aviation operations that one must thoroughly understand.
Initially, when the season began, you’d observe pilots at airports without knowing what went on inside their lounge. By the end, however, you were one of them. So, did your perspective on the communication issues within their group remain unchanged throughout? Not at all. Instead, it was as if I was observing from afar. Once I fully immersed myself in aviation, I came to realize that I couldn’t fathom a flight without some degree of at least minor social disconnect.
Indeed, it served to strengthen your conviction even further, given that you’re usually safe, yet the social aspect remains.
A few months back, some Reddit users discovered your name in the FAA database listed as having a 737-type certification. This caused quite a stir among them. Were you aware of this revelation and did it worry you that it might be exposed?
“Rumbled” is an informal term meaning to have been uncovered or exposed, often in a secretive or clandestine manner.
It turns out that I had something hidden, and they managed to uncover my hidden detail. Since I knew the FAA registry was public, I was aware that if I performed certain actions, people might investigate them. During my flight training, I made sure to keep it a secret from those who knew me or the show. However, I can’t control what others do. If some individuals did know about it and didn’t reveal it, then I appreciate their discretion. Some people enjoy having things spoiled for themselves or knowing what will happen in advance, but personally, I don’t prefer that. Ultimately, the show doesn’t depend on secrets being kept or exposed.
In my work on the show, I conversed with Mark Noort, an individual specializing in safety voice experiments. He was intrigued by the psychological aspects of our approach, and we discussed the ethical implications of conducting such experiments with people. To clarify, as a television producer, I rely on intuition rather than academic oversight. We aim to engage individuals yearning for experiences beyond their daily routines, ensuring they flourish within the show’s unique environment. Our goal is to ensure that even if the experience was unusual, everyone involved feels content and proud to have been part of it, as it will make a memorable addition to their life story. We avoid those who seek excessive control or may become agitated when things don’t go as planned, focusing instead on individuals seeking something intriguing and creative to be a part of.
I believe there’s a genuine prospect to explore opportunities beyond the realm of professional psychology. I penned a book on fear and delved deeply into the fear-related experiments conducted by the Air Force. These tests were quite extraordinary, even by today’s standards, as they would subject draftees to challenging scenarios. For instance, they might put a draftee on an airplane, give them a form written in a confusing manner, then shut down one of the engines and present this ‘insurance form’ to fill out in case the plane crashed. This was essentially a test.
Perhaps, scholars who find themselves constrained by ethical boundaries could reach out to me and propose, “Hey, I have these projects I wish to undertake, but my board won’t allow due to unethical reasons. Could you take them on for me?”
Would you consider that?Sure, why not? If it helps the world, right?
By the way, one of my coworkers from Vulture recently inquired Amy Lee from Evanescence about her thoughts on The Rehearsal. Have you read that interview? I sure did, and I’m thrilled she enjoyed it! [Giggles.]
What particularly resonated with me was this thought she shared: “It seems like fighting an uphill battle against anxiety, as anxiety often stems from uncertainty about the future and the fear of potential unfavorable outcomes.
In the realm of flying, I find myself remarkably attentive and absorbed, a stark contrast to my usual state of mind wanderings. This heightened focus stems from the gravity of the situation – the understanding that every decision matters, keeping me fully immersed in the present moment. It’s intriguing because this level of presence isn’t something I experience often in daily life, and it certainly leaves a lasting impact on me.
To advance from your private-pilot license to the commercial and ATP levels, you need to accumulate flight hours. So, you’re here, solo in your plane, logging hundreds of hours over years to reach the 1,500 hours required for airline work. As I was doing this, I began to understand something else: this extensive solo flying time doesn’t involve learning interactive skills, and suddenly you find yourself piloting an airline plane with passengers, needing to communicate effectively. This is a part of pilot training that often gets overlooked, as the solitary aspect of building hours might actually hinder the development of communication skills – it’s almost like spending years in isolation and then having to go on a date immediately, except there are passengers in the back right away.
It turns out that airlines can’t afford to train pilots by having them fly empty planes due to high fuel costs. Instead, they primarily rely on flight simulators, but these simulations are not perfect replicas of real-life flying conditions. For instance, the sense of urgency and fear associated with the possibility of disaster that one might experience in a real plane is difficult to recreate in a simulation. This makes the training experience intriguing as it doesn’t fully mimic the intensity of actual flight.
Are you asking if I still fly as much as before? Not exactly, but I do fly those empty aircraft whenever I have the chance.
Are you ever asked if you could possibly travel to Kolkata or even China within a specific timeframe, with the reasoning being that a 737 aircraft is scheduled to traverse multiple nations on that day?
For any pilots or aspiring pilots who might chance upon this, have you ever come across the book titled “The Killing Zone”? It’s a fascinating read that I thought I should mention.
The concept of “The Killing Zone” suggests that a significant number of trainee pilots meet their end during the pilot-training period, particularly between 50 hours and 350 hours of flight time. This book serves as an essential guide, outlining key points to keep in mind and potential hazards to be aware of. These are the most frequent causes of early pilot fatalities in crashes, making it crucial knowledge. I believe this book should be compulsory reading for pilots because it covers topics not typically discussed during training, and it’s not something you might naturally consider.
One important aspect the text discusses is the danger posed by misjudging clouds, particularly for private pilots who are prohibited from flying near or in them due to visibility requirements. The book offers a straightforward solution when such an event occurs – instead of panicking and attempting to find a way through, simply perform a 180-degree turn and exit the cloud in the opposite direction.
Are you, who’ve developed a passion for flying, content to just stick with these delivery flights? Or are you considering obtaining a glider rating instead? However, small planes make me feel uneasy. It’s almost like stand-up comedy for me – when I performed multiple times a week, it was less stressful. But taking extended breaks can make it seem overwhelming. So, flying regularly might be challenging for me. Also, frequent changes in types of planes isn’t usually advisable, but who knows, maybe I’ll revisit the small-plane experience at some point. As for The Killing Zone, well, [laughs]!
Have you ever felt apprehensive about reading the book, or is the perceived risk too great for you? I find smaller aircraft a bit more nerve-wracking, to be honest. It’s unsettling, but I’ve never really been drawn to flying in those. On the other hand, large planes like the Airbus A380 have always intrigued me. Just look at one of those giants soaring through the sky; it seems almost comical, doesn’t it? It’s as if you’re thinking, “That thing shouldn’t be able to fly!” And then when an accident happens, it’s like, “Well, I suppose that was inevitable. We have hundreds of people up there in a metal tube.” There’s something absurd about it, doesn’t it?
Read More
- 50 Goal Sound ID Codes for Blue Lock Rivals
- Quarantine Zone: The Last Check Beginner’s Guide
- 50 Ankle Break & Score Sound ID Codes for Basketball Zero
- How to use a Modifier in Wuthering Waves
- Basketball Zero Boombox & Music ID Codes – Roblox
- Lucky Offense Tier List & Reroll Guide
- Ultimate Myth Idle RPG Tier List & Reroll Guide
- Tainted Grail The Fall of Avalon: Best Beginner Build Guide
- MrBeast Becomes the Youngest Self-Made Billionaire in History
- INJ PREDICTION. INJ cryptocurrency
2025-05-26 22:57