Jurassic World Evolution 3 devs backtrack on AI use after player outrage

by

Frontier Developments experimented with artificial intelligence in Jurassic World Evolution 3, but players picked up on it and expressed their disapproval, causing the developers to make swift adjustments.

In simpler terms, for the Jurassic World Evolution game series, developed by the studio, they’ve included a notice on Steam stating that the depictions of scientists were generated through artificial intelligence technology called generative AI.

It wasn’t well-received. Fans criticized Frontier strongly, labeling them as “lazy,” “pathetic,” and “desperate.” They alleged that Frontier prioritized AI over real musicians.

In an unexpected turn of events, Frontier decided to remove all AI-created scientist images from their game, signaling that gamers are not yet comfortable with giving creative control to machines. This change happened quickly and was made public.

Jurassic World Evolution 3 devs caved on AI

Frontier posted on Steam:

Appreciate your input regarding that subject! In our decision-making process for Jurassic World Evolution 3, we’ve chosen not to incorporate generative AI in creating scientist portraits.

In the thrilling world of Jurassic World Evolution, it’s not just about clicking pixels; I am the scientist, the mastermind controlling the Jurassic World! I dig up fossils, decode genomes, and nurture dinosaurs in their delicate infancy. If one gets a bit grumpy, watch out, because they could wreck my park or, even scarier, let loose a T-Rex! Essentially, we’re like deities of the dinosaur realm, clad in lab coats.

And fans like seeing the faces of those gods. When AI touched those portraits, people noticed.

One enthusiastic player expressed disappointment, saying, “After pouring in all that effort, it’s disappointing to find out that you’ve taken shortcuts with the character models using AI instead. Really? My excitement was building up until I saw this. It needs to be addressed before the final release.

As a passionate gamer, I can’t help but express my disdain towards Frontier Developments for resorting to AI-generated content. It feels like a slap in the face to the artistic community, an act of sheer laziness masked as innovation. The issue isn’t just about technology; it’s about trust, respect for artistic integrity, and a deep concern that something essential is being compromised for convenience.

Due to a recent rule implemented by Steam, an AI identifier has become necessary. Developers are now required to openly acknowledge any usage of generative AI in areas such as artwork, dialogue, coding, etc. This is not legally binding, but it’s essential for content published on Steam.

In other game scenarios, the integration of AI can be quite intricate. For instance, the AI version of Darth Vader in Fortnite offered an exciting yet chaotic experience, as it was voiced with approval but misused by players. However, the AI character from inZoi failed to gain popularity among gamers.

The essential point is that players prefer authentic creators working behind the scenes, particularly when the scientists they’re dealing with are genetically engineering raptors.

Read More

2025-06-24 19:18