Is Smite Community Bad? Users Weigh in on Circlejerking and Lying

As a seasoned Smite player who has witnessed the evolution of this captivating game since its early days, I find myself deeply invested in understanding the current turmoil brewing within the community. It’s like watching an epic myth unfold, with players embodying gods and goddesses from various pantheons, each vying for supremacy in the arena.

The recent post by OfficialCoryBaxter struck a chord with me, as I too have seen the game transform in response to player feedback. However, the ongoing debate about “circlejerking” and the focus on cosmetic skins is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it demonstrates the passion that players have for this game; on the other, it highlights an unfortunate tendency towards negativity and entitlement.

I’ve been around long enough to remember when players would complain about the smallest changes – yet here we are, still complaining! But hey, if you can’t laugh at yourself a little, what’s the point of playing Smite, right? So let me share a joke: Why don’t gods use smartphones in battle? Because they prefer to smite ’em with their mighty powers instead!

In all seriousness though, it’s essential for players to embrace change and constructive feedback if we want our beloved game to thrive. Let us strive to find balance between our love for the nostalgia and excitement for the future, ensuring that the Smite community remains a vibrant and welcoming place for all its passionate members. After all, as Hera once said: “In the grand scheme of things, even the gods need to adapt.

As a devoted fan of Smite, I’ve noticed that our community has been going through some rough waters lately. A post on a well-known forum has ignited heated debates about perceived negativity, excessive focus on cosmetic skins, and what some call “circlejerking” among players. It appears that many of us are voicing our dissatisfaction with the current state of the game and sharing our views on the root causes of this community strife. Opinions span a wide range, from fervent backing to extreme criticisms, suggesting that we, as a community, are undergoing some deep introspection.

Anyone else just tired of the circlejerking and lying in this community? How long are we going to just put up with it?
byu/OfficialCoryBaxter inSmite

Summary

The community is grappling with a mix of criticism towards the game’s development and a perceived emphasis on cosmetics over gameplay.
Players express frustration with “circlejerking” – the phenomenon where communities spiral into echo chambers of negativity.
The divide between those who appreciate the game’s evolution versus those who cling to its past is growing wider.
Despite the negativity, many players remain hopeful about future developments and improvements in the game.

A House Divided: Supporters vs. Critics

User OfficialCoryBaxter’s latest post in the Smite community showcases a significant disagreement among players. While he strongly supports the recent updates to the game, explaining they are based on player suggestions and demonstrating the game’s continuous development efforts, some users remain critical of the past version. The term “Circlejerking” is often used by those who believe that excessive negativity is rampant within the community, which can create a vicious cycle of dissatisfaction that overlooks the numerous enhancements made to the game.

A user named Popas_Pipas voiced his dissatisfaction with the gaming community, stating, “I find the game poor and I hope it fades away,” followed by a witty question about why the developers are considered the worst team around when it’s the players themselves who perpetuate the harmful culture within the community. This demonstrates the striking paradox that can be found in this community. Users who express their desire for advancements in the game often fall back on repetitive criticisms, sometimes overlooking significant improvements introduced in recent updates.

Despite facing criticism, a significant group of gamers admire the changes being implemented. Among them, user Mikuschj showcased a refreshing positivity, expressing, “I must admit, I’m really loving S2… I can’t fathom the negative feedback.” Such statements suggest that not every player views the game as doomed. Instead, some gamers are genuinely thrilled about Smite’s future, embracing its beta phases and maintaining optimism regarding its development path.

Skin-Deep Concern: The Focus on Cosmetics

The debate over skins has really heated up in the subreddit, showcasing a larger problem that’s been brewing. One user succinctly captured the general feeling, expressing shock at how some gamers value cosmetic items over essential gameplay concerns. “It’s hard to comprehend why people care more about skins than the actual gameplay,” they wrote, highlighting a concerning pattern among the gaming community. Although skins can be thrilling, they should not overshadow necessary improvements in gameplay mechanics. However, it appears that many players consider them as the key indicator of the game’s quality.

It appears that, despite developers repeatedly explaining their decisions about skin prices and availability, some players are still expressing anger. As MckPuma noted, many criticisms seem to come from individuals who may not fully understand the situation. It’s almost like a part of the community feels compelled to oppose any changes, giving the impression of a traditionalist mindset reminiscent of older versions of the gameplay.

The fixation on game skins hints at a larger problem of feeling entitled, as one observer pointed out, “Simply owning a skin from a 2011 game doesn’t grant you the right to have a skin in a 2025 game! They are different games!” These remarks highlight the immature attitudes found within certain sections of the community, with nostalgia fueling unrealistic assumptions about the games.

(or)

The focus on skins for games reveals a deeper issue related to entitlement. For instance, one commentator argued, “Just because you own a skin from a 2011 game doesn’t mean you should get a skin in a 2025 game! They are different games!” These statements underscore the unrealistic expectations and immaturity that persist in certain parts of the gaming community due to nostalgia.

Community Feedback: What Happened to Positivity?

In this discussion, a common issue arising is the perception that constructive feedback has transformed into harsh criticism. OfficialCoryBaxter expressed concern that when someone attempts to acknowledge improvements or point out inaccuracies, they are frequently branded as a “shill” or a “bootlicker.” This hostile atmosphere results in a situation where positive dialogue is overshadowed by negativity, causing players to feel suppressed.

The caution in praising the game, as expressed by Inpunktion and others, implies that many players secretly hope for its downfall, leading to concerns about whether this negativity perpetuates a gloomy environment. It seems that while some genuinely wish for Smite’s prosperity, their enthusiasm is often manifested through discontent instead of constructive dialogue. MagicFighter proposed that the community needs a “Flavor-of-the-Month complaint,” suggesting that some members seem to enjoy the turmoil caused by constant complaints rather than acknowledging its progress.

As an ardent fan, I can’t help but notice the potential harm such an atmosphere could bring. If we, the players, persist in dwelling on negativity, we might unknowingly set off a cycle that suppresses creativity. The relentless negativity could deter developers from actively engaging with their community, as they might perceive their efforts as fruitless due to the criticism they face, even for minor adjustments.

Hope for the Future: Embracing Change

As a long-time gamer with over a decade of experience under my belt, I can confidently say that Smite continues to shine as a beacon of hope in the gaming world despite the challenges it currently faces. Despite the fact that the current state of the game may not align perfectly with my personal preferences, I find myself eagerly anticipating and remaining patient for what the future holds. This sentiment is shared by many players, like myself, who go by the handle vnv, expressing their dedication to standing by the game as it evolves.

In my gaming journey, I’ve learned that developers often listen to player feedback and make improvements accordingly. While the current state of Smite may not be ideal, I trust that the team behind it will take our input into account and work tirelessly to implement necessary changes. I am optimistic about the game’s future and look forward to seeing what lies ahead for this beloved title in the gaming landscape.

It’s interesting to note that rockout7 offered a unique viewpoint by stating “Smite 2 feels mostly accurate.” Despite criticisms regarding matchmaking issues and bugs, these comments underscore the importance of patience, balancing out the intense criticism from some vocal critics. In essence, a significant overhaul like Smite’s transition necessitates a period of getting used to and adapting, especially one as ambitious as this one.

In essence, while certain players eagerly anticipate upgrades, many others are already diving into this revamped version of the game, proving that progress can be made even amidst expectations. By channeling constructive input and showing understanding, the community can strike a harmonious balance between their passion for gameplay and affection for cosmetic elements.

The debates within the Smite gaming community aren’t mere complaints; they stem from dedicated enthusiasts who care about the game’s development. Regardless of whether they’re preserving cherished memories or looking forward to new possibilities, the discussions surrounding Smite reveal a complex pattern of love, irritation, and optimism. By acknowledging the worth in meaningful dialogue and balancing their criticisms with encouragement, players might discover a more promising future for the game they hold close to their hearts.

2025-01-04 06:58