Is It Time We Retired the Idea of the Chick Flick?

As a seasoned movie critic who has been around since the days of black-and-white television and drive-in theaters, I must say that the success of “It Ends with Us” is nothing short of a breath of fresh air in today’s cinematic landscape. It’s not just another escapist fantasy, it’s a testament to the power of storytelling that transcends traditional genre boundaries.

As someone who has spent countless hours in darkened cinemas, I’ve seen my fair share of films that range from the fantastical to the mundane. But this weekend, I was captivated by a movie that stood out amongst the summer blockbusters – “It Ends with Us.” Unlike the typical escapist fare, it wasn’t just about pretty special effects or action sequences; instead, it delved into deeper themes and had a darker undertone. The performance of Blake Lively was nothing short of mesmerizing.

For quite some time, the term “chick flick” carried a self-aware, ironic feminist connotation. I personally didn’t favor this phrase and avoided using it in my critiques. However, I understood its popularity. The word “chick,” being an outdated sexist term from the 60s, was similar to how the LGBTQ+ community reclaimed the word “queer.” Women embracing “chick” in a trendy manner could be seen as a form of reclamation, transforming something disrespectful into something empowering. Additionally, pairing “chick” with “flick” was a playful way to assert cultural identity.

During the period encompassing “Pretty Woman” up until the era of “Sex and the City,” a fresh wave of feminism emerged among party-going women, characterized by self-awareness. This movement is often associated with what we now call chick flicks – films that could be romantic comedies or melodramas, appealing to women due to an innate instinct. These movies represented a modern version of the old studio system’s “women’s picture,” and by the 1990s, the abundance of such films led to their iconic depiction – a woman alone at home, indulging in a guilty pleasure movie late at night on TV, laughing and crying over her designer ice cream. This image has since evolved into a somewhat outdated meme.

The essence was that women were asserting a unique connection to certain films specifically designed for their demographic. The moniker “chick flick” symbolized this ownership. While the underlying tone might have been a gentle mockery of these movies often being overly sentimental, it could also be seen as a claim of power. Women who embraced “chick flicks” were essentially saying, “We acknowledge their flaws – they’re sappy romantic tales, they’re escapist fantasies, they’re cheesy. But they belong to us.”

It’s widely accepted that the term “chick flick,” which carries strong associations with Nora Ephron’s era, seems outdated. People might suggest replacing this term entirely. However, the issue isn’t just about finding a new label. The datedness extends beyond the phrase itself. Moreover, it’s not only about categorizing these movies based on their female-centric themes as kitsch. Instead, we should question and challenge this approach to film classification that oversimplifies complex female narratives.

Indeed, the term “chick flick” has become distressingly outdated due to its assumption that these films are exclusively for a specific demographic. The misconception originated as a convenient marketing abbreviation, but it’s grown into a harmful cultural myth. To clarify, this myth suggests that certain movies can be neatly categorized and limited to a particular audience, which is far from the truth.

Absolutely, movies can have themes or stories that resonate more with certain groups such as women, men, or people of color, but this doesn’t mean they are exclusive to those demographics. These films aren’t confined to specific audiences; rather, they are open to everyone. For instance, in the 90s, horror and action movies were often labeled as “guy” genres. However, women have consistently been attending these films, leading to a shift in the traditional demographic profile of such moviegoers. In fact, the audience for horror today is a dynamic mix of various groups.

To fully understand the demographic of those who watch romantic comedies, or ‘chick flicks’, let’s pretend for a moment that we could somehow count everyone who ever watched one in cinemas during the 1990s and 2000s. It’s likely that the majority would be women. However, you might wonder about…the men. Were they all forced to go by their partners? Did they not find these movies enjoyable? Do men never crave romantic comedies? Do they not sometimes seek them out? After all, don’t men also have feelings and may even shed a tear at the end? Apologies for the question, but do men not share this emotional response as well?

In numerous aspects, our current society embraces diversity, breaking free from traditional stereotypes across genders, sexual orientations, and ethnicities. The essence of this progressive culture lies in its refusal to label individuals. Regrettably, when it comes to discussions about moviegoers’ preferences, we seem stuck in the 1950s mentality. What’s worse, we perpetuate these outdated notions to restrict the types of films produced.

As someone who has spent years working in the entertainment industry, I can attest to the fact that the landscape has evolved significantly since the 1950s. Movies like “It Ends with Us” are a testament to this change, proving that women’s stories and perspectives are not only relevant but also highly profitable in today’s marketplace.

2024-08-11 23:46

Is It Time We Retired the Idea of the Chick Flick?

Read More

Minority Mindset