In a Universe where absurdities are as common as stars, Jeff Park has decided to transform Harvard into the cosmic joke it seems to have been angling for. According to our illustrious friend Park, the Big Red House in Cambridge believes it’s running a Bitcoin operation when, in reality, it’s Ethereum in disguise. Make no mistake, dear reader, it matters – because as anyone who’s seen a coffee machine knows, distinctions are made of sterner stuff.
Key difference in governance
Whereas Bitcoin is a rigid, unchanging, utterly inflexible endeavor reminiscent of your childhood governess, Ethereum is more akin to a loosely organized tea party where the rules evolve with the wind and the enthusiastic marshaling of social agreement. Park quietly points out – in a whisper, lest we startle the deer – that Harvard, while letting itself bask in the mystery of admissions scarcity, is in fact exercising discretion broader than the Milky Way in its vastness.
The problem with Harvard is that it thinks itās Bitcoin when itās Ethereum
– Jeff Park (@dgt10011) December 30, 2025
When Elon Musk mused about broken deals and unfair playing fields, Park’s suggestion was rather anti-climactic – admit one more student, a solution so simple it’s shocking. Yet, it seems that the concept of such obvious solutions is too naive for the elevated realities of elite institutions, for whom the “artificial scarcity” approach is akin to worshipping a hologram.
Admissions at these hallowed halls are often presented as a grim zero-sum game, directed by the tyranny of “capacity constraints” and the dramatic allure of “fairness”. Bless Park for noting these limitations are less physical and more strategic in nature. The game, it seems, is orchestrated by governance, not gravity.
Harvard’s system
The notion that results shift annually like camouflaged fashion statements, simply due to shifting internal whims, suggests that it’s not Bitcoin, it’s more like your Aunt Gertrude’s interpretation of free will. For those born in the cosmic cradle of blockchain, the discrepancy dawns in a nanosecond – because governance is like breathing – necessary yet debatable. Isn’t it almost paradoxical to proclaim fairness when one secretly drags the rule book out behind the shed for occasional alterations?
Ethereum doesn’t delve into the Kafkaesque fantasy that rules are the end-all; rather, Bitcoin has taken that leap. Park asserts – with the fervor of someone explaining that the moon landing was real – that Harvardās cardinal error isnāt that it decides admissions, but rather that it staunchly denies its own influence. Nestled comfortably in denial, it serenades the language of inevitability while shunning accountability.
Read More
- The Batman 2 Villain Update Backs Up DC Movie Rumor
- Adolescenceās Co-Creator Is Making A Lord Of The Flies Show. Everything We Know About The Book-To-Screen Adaptation
- Exodus Looks To Fill The Space-Opera RPG Void Left By Mass Effect
- Puzzled by āTable decoration that you can light upā in Cookie Jam? Letās solve this puzzle together
- The Best Battlefield REDSEC Controller Settings
- Will there be a Wicked 3? Wicked for Good stars have conflicting opinions
- Woman hospitalized after Pluribus ad on smart fridge triggers psychotic episode
- Zombieland 3ās Intended Release Window Revealed By OG Director
- āStranger Thingsā Actor Gives Health Update After Private Cancer Battle
- New survival game in the Forest series will take us to a sci-fi setting. The first trailer promises a great challenge
2025-12-30 12:25