color: var(color-red-500)

by

Stablecoins After the Perps Approval: Why Crypto Dollars Still Anchor Trading Risk

Imagine a crypto trader selling off smaller cryptocurrencies after a turbulent week. Instead of converting their funds to traditional money, they hold onto stablecoins like USDC, ready to jump back into trading. This is a common way traders manage risk in the crypto world – by temporarily holding their value in digital dollars that exist directly on the blockchain.

A new rule from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) marks a significant shift for the crypto industry. They’ve approved a type of bitcoin futures contract that doesn’t expire, and also provided guidance allowing customers to use their own digital assets – like cryptocurrencies and stablecoins – as collateral for certain futures trades. While these changes seem complex, they fundamentally impact how risk is managed within the crypto market.

The real question isn’t if stablecoins are important now that perpetual futures have been approved, but rather why they remain the preferred tool for managing and assessing risk across most trading firms.

The Big Picture: Why This Moment Matters

Changes to how derivatives are regulated often affect related areas like collateral requirements, how transactions are settled, and the overall market structure. For example, on May 29, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission approved a new type of bitcoin futures contract offered by KalshiEX, LLC (according to a CFTC announcement).

Also that day, the CFTC’s Market Participants Division issued guidance clarifying that, under certain conditions, Coinbase Financial Markets can use customer-owned digital commodities and payment stablecoins as collateral for specific futures contracts with an international broker. This was detailed in a press release from the CFTC.

Allowing permissions and offering margin relief don’t eliminate the need for stablecoins; they simply create clear rules for how and where these digital dollars can be used within the broader crypto system.

These days, many financial players – including U.S.-based institutions, international exchanges, and new online platforms – are heavily involved with stablecoins. They use them to manage cash, and what’s crucial is the underlying collateral: its type, location, and how easily it can be transferred.

From Offshore Habit to Onshore Signal: What the CFTC Just Did

Perpetual futures contracts have been growing in popularity on international exchanges and within the crypto space, but U.S. regulations haven’t kept pace. Recent events on May 29th suggest a small but important shift in that landscape.

  1. CFTC Order on a Bitcoin-Referenced Perp: Approval of KalshiEX’s BTCPERP advances the idea that a perp structure tied to bitcoin can live inside the U.S. regulatory perimeter (CFTC press release).
  2. Staff Relief on Stablecoin Margin: The CFTC Market Participants Division’s staff interpretation and no-action position lets Coinbase Financial Markets, under specified conditions, post customer-owned digital commodities and payment stablecoins as margin with a foreign broker affiliate for certain foreign-futures arrangements (CFTC press release (Market Participants Division)).

What this does not mean

This isn’t a complete approval of stablecoins for all U.S. futures trading, nor is it a thumbs-up for every type of cryptocurrency perpetual contract. It’s a specific acknowledgment that crypto assets are becoming a standard part of how markets function, and that perpetual contracts can be managed with clear rules in place.

Why stablecoins stay central

Financial risk is always measured in dollars. No matter where trading happens – whether on a traditional exchange, an offshore platform, or directly on a blockchain – traders ultimately calculate profits and losses, fund their accounts, and settle transactions using US dollars. Stablecoins act as a convenient and flexible way to represent and manage those dollars digitally.

How Crypto Dollars Move Through Perps

Perpetual contracts simplify trading by removing traditional delivery dates, turning it into a system focused on funding and collateral. Stablecoins facilitate these transactions.

Centralized venues

When trading on most cryptocurrency exchanges, users usually deposit USDT or USDC as security for contracts priced in US dollars. Funding costs – payments either added or subtracted – are calculated in dollars or similar currencies, making it easier to track risk. Exchanges also adjust the amount of collateral required based on the asset, and generally favor stablecoins with high trading volume to ensure smooth operations.

On-chain venues

Hyperliquid, a platform operating directly on the blockchain, held stablecoins as collateral for its trading positions, using external data feeds (oracles) and automatic reduction of risk (auto-deleveraging) to ensure financial stability. According to VanEck research, in the first quarter of 2026, Hyperliquid processed around $633 billion in trades (both perpetual contracts and immediate purchases). This demonstrates that cryptocurrency is driving significant activity in the derivatives market, even without traditional intermediaries.

Why dollars, not BTC or ETH, for margin?

When using Bitcoin or Ethereum as collateral for related futures contracts, both can fall in value at the same time during market downturns. Using stablecoins as collateral helps break this cycle, makes profits and losses clearer, and allows for faster movement of funds between different trading platforms.

Collateral Hierarchy: Why USDT and USDC Dominate

There’s a significant amount of stablecoins in circulation, totaling over $320 billion as of late May 2026. Tether (USDT) makes up around $188 billion of that, and USD Coin (USDC) accounts for roughly $76 billion, according to DeFiLlama. This large and readily available supply is a key reason why many financial platforms directly integrate with USDT and USDC for managing risk.

As a researcher, I’ve been analyzing the stablecoins most commonly used in perpetual futures (perps) trading. Here’s a breakdown of what I’ve found. Tether (USDT) is everywhere, accepted on pretty much every centralized exchange and blockchain platform. It’s the standard for collateral and settling trades, especially outside the US, and has great liquidity. USDC, issued by Circle, is also widely used, particularly on major exchanges and Layer 2 solutions. It’s the preferred choice for institutions that need to comply with US regulations, and its transparency makes reporting easier. DAI, from MakerDAO, is different – it’s built for DeFi and backed by a mix of crypto and real-world assets. While it’s a good option for on-chain perps, its decentralized nature involves some trade-offs depending on what it’s backed by. PayPal’s PYUSD is newer, with growing acceptance on some exchanges and Layer 2s. Its brand recognition could help it gain traction, but its liquidity is still developing. Finally, FDUSD, issued by First Digital, is integrated into several large exchanges and is used as collateral or for settlement where those exchanges support it. Its adoption seems to be driven by which venues choose to list it.

Haircuts and operational frictions

Platforms determine risk levels for different digital assets based on how easily they can be converted to cash, how they are settled, and how well they meet regulatory requirements. USDT and USDC generally have the lowest risk levels because of their large size and widespread use, but these levels can differ depending on the exchange and the specific laws in place.

Liquidity After Approval: What Changes, and What Doesn’t

The CFTC’s recent actions regarding Bitcoin perpetual swaps and stablecoin margin for foreign futures won’t cause immediate, drastic changes, but they could encourage important improvements to how these systems work.

Potential shifts

  • Better intermediation: Prime-broker-like desks may more confidently offer cross-venue financing with stablecoin rails that satisfy evolving interpretations.
  • Collateral mobility: More seamless movement of USDC/USDT between onshore brokers and affiliated foreign venues, within the bounds of specific no-action conditions (CFTC press release (Market Participants Division)).
  • Template effect: The BTCPERP approval provides a reference point for structuring perps under U.S. oversight (CFTC press release).

What stays the same

Most financial risks and transactions are still measured in US dollars. While platforms like Hyperliquid demonstrate that perpetual futures can function with stablecoin collateral, a shift away from the dollar won’t happen quickly. Market participants currently prioritize having readily available funds and fast processing speeds over adopting new financial philosophies.

Outlook: Pricing Risk in Dollars, Building in Blocks

Don’t expect big, sudden changes in policy. Instead, progress will probably happen gradually, through smaller actions and temporary measures. At the same time, those building in the crypto space will continue to focus on making things more efficient – like speeding up transactions with stablecoins, improving the reliability of data sources, and making reserve information clearer.

Stablecoins will remain central to risk in the crypto world because they combine three key functions: tracking profits and losses in US dollars, enabling instant, around-the-clock transactions, and serving as collateral that can be used on different platforms. As regulations develop, the companies that can make these three functions work together most smoothly will have a significant advantage.

Risks & What Could Go Wrong

  • Depegging events: A sudden break in a stablecoin’s peg can trigger forced deleveraging and collateral gaps.
  • Regulatory reversals: Staff relief is conditional and revocable; broader rules could narrow where stablecoins count as margin.
  • Custody and operational risk: Failures at wallets, brokers, or smart contracts can strand collateral.
  • Banking and reserve exposure: Reserve asset stress (e.g., short-term credit markets) can impair redemptions.
  • Oracle and liquidation risk on-chain: Bad data or congestion can undermine solvency protections.
  • Blacklist and freeze mechanics: Some fiat-backed stablecoins can be frozen, complicating collateral recovery.

Stablecoins don’t eliminate risk; they simply shift it. Instead of dealing with price swings, users face new challenges related to how stablecoins are run, legal issues, and the quality of the assets backing them – all of which need careful management.

Crypto Daily provides up-to-the-minute news and in-depth analysis of the derivatives market and changes to stablecoin regulations. We monitor official sources, reports, and blockchain data to keep you informed. For the latest updates and detailed research, visit Crypto Daily.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the CFTC approval legalize all crypto perpetuals in the U.S.?

The CFTC has approved a single type of bitcoin futures contract (BTCPERP) for trading on KalshiEX. This approval doesn’t mean all similar contracts or exchanges are automatically approved, according to the CFTC.

Can U.S. brokers now accept stablecoins as margin across the board?

The staff’s recent interpretation and decision not to take action relate specifically to Coinbase Financial Markets and only applies to certain types of foreign futures transactions. It’s not a general rule that applies to all situations (according to a CFTC press release from the Market Participants Division).

Why are USDT and USDC so dominant as collateral?

As of late May 2026, stablecoins were a significant part of the crypto market, totaling around $320 billion. USDT and USDC were the leading stablecoins, with approximately $188 billion and $76 billion in value respectively, providing substantial liquidity and wide-ranging support across various platforms (DeFiLlama).

How do on-chain perps compare to centralized exchanges?

Both systems operate similarly, relying on collateral and funding tied to the US dollar. However, on-chain protocols use smart contracts to automatically enforce the rules. Trading volume on Hyperliquid (~$633 billion in perpetual futures and spot trading) during the first quarter of 2026 demonstrates that this on-chain approach is workable, according to VanEck.

Will regulatory clarity reduce the use of stablecoins?

Honestly, I don’t see things changing much anytime soon. Even if we get more ways to settle trades with cash, most traders, myself included, really prefer using stablecoins. They let us move funds around the clock, easily track profits in dollars, and reuse collateral across different platforms – it’s just way more convenient.

What should risk teams watch next?

Factors like required collateral adjustments for each platform, clarity around reserve assets, any future rules from the CFTC, and technical details such as how quickly data is updated and how dependable bridges between blockchains are all important for ensuring collateral works correctly on the blockchain.

Read More

2026-05-30 13:51