Can the Sundance Film Festival Survive Leaving Park City?

As a film critic who’s been attending Sundance since 1995, I’ve witnessed the festival evolve from a humble gathering of indie filmmakers to a cultural phenomenon that shapes American cinema. The prospect of Sundance moving from its iconic location in Park City is like asking a cat to leave its cozy cardboard box – it might find a bigger, shinier box, but it’ll never be the same.

Over the past year, an extraordinary competition has been unfolding, with cities across America competing to host the prestigious Sundance Film Festival (“Fancy hosting a top-tier independent film festival? Enter our contest today!”). The most intriguing twist in this competition was recently revealed: the three finalists vying to become the new home of Sundance. They are Boulder, Cincinnati, and Salt Lake City/Park City – yes, you read that correctly; the current location of the festival is among the contenders. This has sparked curiosity: Could this competition be a clever ruse by Sundance to renegotiate or improve its existing agreement with its current base?

In actuality, it’s more complex than it seems. If Salt Lake City/Park City were to win (the decision is expected in February 2025 following the upcoming Sundance), take note of the order in which these cities are presented. Park City has been hosting the Sundance Film Festival since 1981, originally known as the U.S. Film Festival, with a few screenings and events happening in Salt Lake City. Since 1995, I’ve attended Sundance, but I’ve never been to a screening in Salt Lake City. However, if these two Utah cities were to emerge victorious, the Sundance Film Festival might primarily move to Salt Lake; Park City would then serve as a secondary location. This shift could bring about significant changes, both practically and symbolically.

The breathtaking winter landscape of Park City remains enveloped by majestic mountains. However, it wasn’t until Robert Redford settled in the region and established the Sundance Institute that the town became synonymous with Sundance. Since then, it’s been challenging to distinguish the essence of Park City from that of Redford at Sundance. I’m not merely referring to Redford’s star power here, but rather his artistic values and the reasons behind founding Sundance – a desire for independent films beyond Hollywood. The town’s previous mining history blended with Redford’s cinematic allure through Sundance. Moreover, the festival brought significant financial gains to the town, ensuring overall prosperity.

Now, financial gain is what’s driving Sundance’s decision to relocate. The Sundance Film Festival remains beneficial for Park City, but with the rise of luxurious winter getaways catering to the wealthy elite, the ski season has become even more lucrative. Essentially, the town stands to earn more from skiing than it does from a film festival. Consequently, it’s less inviting, in terms of its snowy welcome, towards everything Sundance.

Should Sundance decide to relocate to Salt Lake City, the commonalities between the city and the festival’s identity would be scarce. The festival embodies artistry, progressiveness, and international flair, while Salt Lake City serves as the conservative hub of Mormonism. It’s not that one is inherently better than the other, but their union seems unlikely. A Sundance Film Festival in Salt Lake City might feel like a desert oasis or an incongruous event. Despite being merely a 45-minute drive from Park City, one might wonder why Sundance would choose to move here instead of more fitting locales such as Boulder or Cincinnati.

Among the three choices, Boulder seems to have the most resemblance to Park City. Therefore, it might be beneficial for Sundance, when relocating in 2027, to consider transferring to a charming old mining town nestled in the heart of Colorado. After all, why not?

However, here’s the crux of the issue. For countless actors, filmmakers, executives, journalists, publicists, and others who flock there every January, Park City has been an integral part of Sundance’s essence. This town is brimming with memories – at this stage, you could refer to it as a historical, silver-and-turquoise Wild West repository of the Sundance Institute. Park City embodies the Sundance brand. If we were to separate Sundance from it, the festival’s identity would transform drastically, potentially into something far less recognizable.

One explanation for this could be that Sundance has been grappling with an identity crisis, given its status as a film festival. During the 1980s, it represented the grassroots era of low-budget independent filmmaking. At that time, it was on the fringes of mainstream culture. However, the surge of independent cinema transformed it into a cultural epicenter. From the ’90s onwards, many emerging artists and storytellers could be found there, often going on to make their mark in Hollywood or continue independently (or both). It served as an essential hub for anticipating and shaping the future and present of American cinema.

The unique charm of Sundance lies in its ability to present films that are both artistic masterpieces and commercially viable. In today’s era of streaming and mass-market appeal, achieving this balance has become increasingly rare. As a result, films from Sundance may not garner the recognition they once did. This isn’t anyone’s fault; it’s simply a reflection of how the movie industry and audience tastes are changing. Some might argue that Sundance is at risk of becoming less relevant, gradually slipping into a niche market status. If its iconic location were to change, one might wonder: Where are we? What has this festival become? Would a new location make Sundance the hub for American independent film, or simply a redirection of it?

I want to make my stance clear. I hold the Sundance Film Festival in high regard, having personal connections with some of its key figures such as Eugene Hernandez, its esteemed director. Despite understanding the economic pressures driving their decision to relocate, which may be backed by extensive research, I can’t help but draw parallels with one of the most regrettable corporate marketing decisions in recent history: the introduction of New Coke in 1985. The Coca-Cola company, driven by financial considerations and presumably substantial research, altered a product that was already perfect – a move that turned out to be disastrous. The lesson here is profound: some brands carry such strong emotional connections that tampering with them can lead to significant consequences.

Nearly every iconic film festival, such as Cannes, Venice, Telluride, and Toronto, shares its name with the city where it’s held. Sundance is an exception; it isn’t called the Park City Film Festival, but in essence, it might as well be. It has always been deeply connected to this place. I hope that Sundance continues to thrive, even if it moves to Cincinnati, but I fervently hope they don’t change its roots and transform it, through location, into a hollow imitation of its former self.

2024-09-14 19:47

Can the Sundance Film Festival Survive Leaving Park City?

Read More

Minority Mindset