Blake Lively’s legal team is working to prevent the disclosure of private and financial details during the lawsuit with Justin Baldoni, as they’ve mentioned receiving threatening and misogynistic messages from various sources.
In this case, which involves numerous well-known people, Lively is seeking a court ruling to maintain the secrecy of specific details. These details should not be disclosed on platforms such as Snapchat, TikTok, or YouTube. The confidential information encompasses salary data, financial statements, corporate ownership, creative concepts, movie scripts, photographs, videos, and medical records.
In a court letter sent yesterday, Lively’s legal team expressed that such an injunction is essential due to the fact that they, along with other case participants, have previously encountered “abusive, obscene, misogynistic, and menacing messages.”
Or simply:
Lively’s lawyers wrote a court letter Thursday night stating that an injunction is necessary because of the “harsh, vulgar, sexist, and threatening communications” they and others in the case have faced.
Lawyers for Lively stated that one of her supporting witnesses received a menacing message, warning of sexual violence and murder against their family, following the release of their texts in an updated lawsuit filed by Baldoni. Additionally, Lively has encountered instances of pornographic harassment on Instagram, according to her legal team’s statement.
In a federal court in New York, director-cum-co-star of “It Ends With Us,” Alexis Baldoni, is locked in a legal battle with actress Rachel Lively. Lively claims that Baldoni subjected her to sexual harassment during filming and retaliated by orchestrating a malicious online defamation campaign against her. Conversely, Baldoni alleges that Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, are attempting to ruin his career with baseless accusations and inciting his talent agency, WME, to terminate their contract with him.
Over the past six weeks, I’ve found myself immersed in a legal tug-of-war, both publicly and behind closed courtroom doors. The focal points of this intense struggle have been diverse, encompassing professional ethics concerning out-of-court statements, the boundaries of subpoenas, and now, the protective order that will dictate how we share information during the discovery process.
Previously, Judge Lewis Liman requested that all parties present a proposed protective order by March 11th. While Baldoni’s legal team has consented to use the court’s standard protective order, Lively’s legal team desires to include more specific details and an additional level of confidentiality for certain information.
In unique situations, I advocate for an amended standard where sensitive information can be marked as “for attorneys’ eyes only” not just in extraordinary circumstances, but also when it appears that disclosure could potentially harm the producing party competitively, financially, commercially, or infringe on their privacy.
Read More
- Lucky Offense Tier List & Reroll Guide
- Best Crosshair Codes for Fragpunk
- Indonesian Horror Smash ‘Pabrik Gula’ Haunts Local Box Office With $7 Million Haul Ahead of U.S. Release
- League of Legends: The Spirit Blossom 2025 Splash Arts Unearthed and Unplugged!
- ‘Severance’ Renewed for Season 3 at Apple TV+
- Unlock All Avinoleum Treasure Spots in Wuthering Waves!
- How To Find And Solve Every Overflowing Palette Puzzle In Avinoleum Of WuWa
- Skull and Bones Year 2 Showcase: Get Ready for Big Ships and Land Combat!
- Russian Twitch Streamer Attacked in Tokyo as Japan Clamps Down on Influencer Behavior
- Unlock Every Room in Blue Prince: Your Ultimate Guide to the Mysterious Manor!
2025-02-21 21:18