Trump’s Crypto Vision Threatened?

by

Image of Tyler Winklevoss looking thoughtful

Honestly, the drama! You wouldn’t *believe* what Tyler Winklevoss of Gemini has been tweeting. Apparently, JPMorgan (yes, *that* JPMorgan, the one Jamie Dimon famously declared was going to “eat crypto”) and their friends are actively trying to, and I quote, “derail financial innovation.” It’s all a bit much, isn’t it? Like a boardroom full of grey suits plotting against the future, while I’m just here trying to decide which overpriced avocado toast to order. 🥑

The whole kerfuffle revolves around this “Open Banking Rule.” It basically means you, dear reader, can actually access your financial data and share it with third-party apps – like Plaid, and, crucially, crypto platforms like Gemini (naturally!), Coinbase, and Kraken. Think of it as finally getting control of your own digital life, rather than leaving it all in the hands of…well, you know.

JPMorgan: Blocking Crypto, One Fee at a Time?

But, naturally, some big banks (JPMorgan being the ringleader, allegedly) aren’t thrilled about this. They’re challenging the rule in court, which Winklevoss is framing as a direct assault on both consumer choice and, wait for it…President Trump’s grand vision of America being the world’s crypto capital. 🙄 I mean, you know, the man who once called Bitcoin a “fraud.” So, a bit of a shift in perspective there, wouldn’t you say?

“This will bankrupt fintechs that help you link your bank accounts to crypto companies…so you can easily fund your account with fiat to buy Bitcoin and crypto.”

Honestly, the sheer audacity! “Bankrupt fintechs”! One really does wonder what these old guard institutions are so afraid of. Is it the disruption? The innovation? Or just the prospect of someone else making a profit? 🤔

Image of Jamie Dimon looking stern

And then there’s Arjun Sethi from Kraken, chiming in with similar anxieties. Apparently, JPMorgan’s proposed fees for data access are less about “technical innovation” and more about a, and I quote again, “strategic power grab.” A toll, he calls it. How very medieval. It does make you wonder, doesn’t it? If everything becomes a transaction, are we just back to the feudal system, but with blockchain?

“This is not a technical innovation. It is a toll…This fundamentally limits what can be built on top.”

Crypto: A Decentralized Dream (or Just Another Bubble?)

Sethi, bless his heart, paints a rather idyllic picture of crypto, contrasting it with JPMorgan’s closed-off approach. Public ledgers, permissionless access, smart contracts…it all sounds very promising, doesn’t it? Like a utopian future where data flows freely and everyone is empowered. ✨ Of course, we’ve all heard that before. Remember Web3? Don’t get me started.

He warns, quite rightly, that crypto shouldn’t simply replicate the centralized power structures it claims to be dismantling. It’s the old story: be careful what you wish for. If the crypto space becomes just another playground for the powerful, what’s the point?

“We should not be optimizing for defensibility through restriction. We should be leveraging our position and profitability to build better access, more open architecture, and more composable systems.”

So, the question remains: can crypto truly deliver on its promise of a more open and equitable financial system? Or will it just end up being another iteration of the same old story? I’m off to ponder this over a very large glass of rosé. 🥂

Image of a rose wine glass

Read More

2025-07-21 04:37