Gaming Journalists Are Now Psychoanalyzing Sora’s Love Life

by

If you’ve found a way to step outside, feel the earth beneath your feet, or keep your composure amidst recent events, you might have overlooked the latest instance of bias disguised as video game reporting. As reported by TheGamer, it’s suggested that Kingdom Hearts main character Sora may be oblivious to love due to an experience known as “compulsory heterosexuality.

Yes, really…

I wouldn’t have believed this myself had I not seen Vara Dark break it down in her latest video.

As a passionate movie reviewer, I’ve often found myself pointing out instances where cultural narratives are twisted or distorted, and in my latest analysis, I delved into an intriguing perspective presented by TheGamer regarding the character of Sora from the popular Kingdom Hearts series. Unlike typical explanations that attribute his emotional complexity to being a 15-year-old wielder of a magical keyblade with the burden of multiple universes, this piece proposes an interesting twist: Sora’s perceived heterosexuality might not be a conscious choice but rather a subconscious conformity driven by societal expectations. This thought-provoking interpretation adds depth to Sora’s character and opens up conversations about the influence of society on individual identity.

Yes. Really….

It seems this originates from a moment in the Pirates of the Caribbean universe, where Davy Jones ponders, “Ah, love. Such a fearsome tie, and yet it can be so effortlessly broken.

In a sincere manner, Sora clarifies: “What you’re saying isn’t accurate. While there’s certainly much more for me to grasp about love, I do understand the concept of opening up my heart to others.

Instead of accepting the heartfelt phrase as is, TheGamer interpreted it differently, seeing it as a hint suggesting a hidden or suppressed side to Sora’s personality, possibly shaped by years of observing Disney couples overcome adversity.

Because Belle and Beast just don’t speak to him, apparently.

The author openly acknowledges that the foundation of her article stems from her personal journey as a gay woman, who found it challenging to connect with Disney princesses during her upbringing. Rather than accepting this as a unique perspective, she reinterprets Sora’s inner thoughts using her own identity lens, ultimately suggesting he too is dealing with the weight of “heteronormative societal expectations.

This is what passes for video game journalism now.

According to Vara, they no longer seem concerned with upholding the original author’s intentions. In fact, these interpretations feel more like an invasion or taking over of the story. If a character doesn’t already express what the author intended, the interpreter often adds their own thoughts instead.

Instead of focusing on the creator’s original vision, or giving priority to the fans, there’s a new strategy in play: trying to mold each franchise around a self-created identity story, regardless of its suitability or logical fit.

It seems this isn’t an original approach. Various gaming news sources like TheGamer, among others, have used it previously. They’ve asserted that The Legend of Zelda has traditionally been associated with the PRIDE community and can identify with non-binary genders, contradicting Nintendo’s longstanding lore where Link is portrayed as male and consistently referred to in this manner.

As these individuals who claim authority over storylines suggest, the specific content within a narrative is secondary. Instead, they emphasize interpreting potential implications by squinting and disregarding established traditions or knowledge that spans for several decades.

In a similar fashion, Vara pointed out that the same tactic has been employed against Hogwarts Legacy, where some gaming journalism platforms argued that playing the game equated to endorsing harmful viewpoints. When gamers refused to conform, these activist critics intensified their stance and persisted in attempting to impose their ideology at every opportunity.

The goal isn’t journalism; it’s compliance. And when compliance fails, it turns into shaming.

There’s a striking contradiction here. Those very individuals who emphasize that personal identity is individual and can change, and nobody should presume someone’s sexual orientation or label them without permission, often swiftly label fictional characters – and at times even real people – as victims of societal manipulation.

Apparently, these writers suggest that in traditional relationships, a woman might not be experiencing genuine love but rather conditioning. Similarly, for a teenager boy who hasn’t kissed anyone by the 90th hour of his role-playing game, they imply he may be hiding an unconventional sexual orientation, metaphorically speaking.

It’s important to understand: individuals are free to connect with fictional characters as they see fit. If someone identifies with Sora or Link, that’s great. However, there’s a distinction between private headcanon and forcing creators and the community to validate your perspective, using platforms to propagate these viewpoints. There’s a boundary between engagement and domination—and this form of “criticism” disregards it completely.

It’s quite possible that Sora’s misunderstanding of love stems less from traditional notions of romantic relationships and more from the fact that he’s a young character navigating complex themes like darkness and light, all while using friendship and magical elements reminiscent of Disney stories. Perhaps this unique aspect of his journey is sufficient for him to grow and learn.

Also, pretty sure his canon romance is Kairi for like every single game. Just saying…

Perhaps we could refrain from constantly making every game character a representation of someone’s personal identity dilemma.

According to Vara’s words, “TheGamer” is essentially overflowing with individuals who are less concerned about providing quality gaming content and more interested in pushing their own agendas onto the users.

Can we please stop?

Read More

2025-06-30 21:56