A complaint has been lodged as a group legal action against Twitch, alleging that they have breached California law by restricting users from expressing negative opinions about the platform.
On June 1st, a Twitch user named Daniel Blitch lodged a complaint in California, asserting that the platform was breaching the regulations outlined in the state’s Yelp Law.
It is forbidden for companies to insert provisions in agreements that limit people’s ability to express opinions about the business, its employees, or the services it offers.
As a devoted user, I find myself at odds with Twitch’s policies, as per the lawsuit, they seemingly overstep boundaries by attempting to unjustly limit our freedom to openly discuss and share our personal experiences with their platform and services. This action appears to contravene the California Civil Code.
Twitch accused of using TOS to silence criticism
As a gaming enthusiast hailing from sunny Los Angeles, I’ve been hooked to streamers since 2020. I’ve noticed that this platform takes a stand against or subtly advises against comments that might harm their reputation.
According to the lawsuit, Twitch’s terms of service state that users cannot post content deemed harmful, disrespectful, deceptive, or offensive by Twitch. These rules are enforced through moderation, account penalties, and removal of posts. Moreover, the lawsuit states that users can be banned from the site for any reason, as per the suit’s reading.
In simpler terms, Daniel Blitch and a group of individuals have filed a collective lawsuit against Twitch. Their primary claim is that the specific and unique terms in Twitch’s Terms of Service (ToS) are problematic, leading them to argue that the entire ToS document may not be valid. The complaint spans across nine pages.
— yeet (@Awk20000) June 2, 2025
For instance, a legal case highlighted that at some point, there had been talks suggesting Twitch wasn’t compensating its streamers adequately. This sparked cautiousness among Blitch and other users when addressing this matter, with them occasionally using the term “onionized” instead of the more common term “unionized.
The suit stated that Twitch’s application of its terms and conditions discourages users from openly sharing their true opinions, which can lead to a stifling effect on user expression, commonly known as the “chill” or “chilling” effect on free speech.
Moreover, Blitch stated that on at least one occasion, a Twitch user faced disciplinary action due to their critique of the platform.
In a class action lawsuit involving Twitch, California users who bought subscriptions or merchandise might be entitled to participate. According to the Yelp Law, penalties for non-compliance begin at $2,500 per offense, yet can escalate up to $10,000 for instances of deliberate or negligent disregard.
Currently, as I’m typing this, Twitch hasn’t made a public statement regarding the lawsuit, however, it’s important to note that this is not the first instance where Twitch has encountered legal issues.
Back in 2025, a groundbreaking expose from TopMob uncovered that they’d been charging certain users for subscriptions linked to streamers who’d already been permanently banned on their platform. Once the news sparked a stir, an attorney stepped up and strategized a class action lawsuit for the impacted users. Fortunately, we were among those who received our refunds later on.
Read More
- 50 Goal Sound ID Codes for Blue Lock Rivals
- Quarantine Zone: The Last Check Beginner’s Guide
- 50 Ankle Break & Score Sound ID Codes for Basketball Zero
- Ultimate Myth Idle RPG Tier List & Reroll Guide
- Lucky Offense Tier List & Reroll Guide
- Mirren Star Legends Tier List [Global Release] (May 2025)
- Every House Available In Tainted Grail: The Fall Of Avalon
- Basketball Zero Boombox & Music ID Codes – Roblox
- How to use a Modifier in Wuthering Waves
- Enshrouded Hemotoxin Crisis: How to Disable the Curse and Save Your Sanity!
2025-06-03 00:49