After 12 years, The Last of Us director has settled the discussion about the ending, but fans aren’t satisfied

by

The climactic scene from the initial episode of The Last of Us is not just one of the most impactful moments in the show, but it’s also a topic that fans frequently revisit. Numerous discussions among enthusiasts have been ignited due to the unanswered question: Did the Fireflies ever truly have an opportunity to develop a cure for humanity at Ellie’s expense?

12 years after the debut of the initial installment, Neil Druckmann put an end to a lengthy debate. In a recent interview with Sacred Symbols (through GamesRadar), the developer unequivocally stated that within the game’s universe, there was a viable chance of discovering a cure for the cordyceps infection.

druckmann simply stated that our goal was for them to discover a cure. He further noted that this raises an intriguing philosophical dilemma regarding Joel’s actions.

It appears that the information provided by Druckmann doesn’t seem to comfort all fans, as suggested by comments on Reddit. Instead, some users express disappointment that their questions about the ending have been clarified, suggesting it might have been more engaging if the ambiguity remained.

Additionally, they held the opinion that the game depicted the recovery period as extremely unpredictable. In truth, the chief physician of the Fireflies operated as a veterinarian in a dilapidated medical facility, equipped with minimal resources for producing medication.

It seems plausible, given their ignorance, for the players to find a way to understand or accept Joel’s actions, despite the fact that by sacrificing Ellie’s life, he essentially sealed humanity’s fate.

Read More

2025-05-23 14:02