How a $100 Million Disney Flop Changed Animation History Forever!

by

Disney, renowned for its captivating films and enchanting realms, isn’t immune to the occasional misstep. In 2011, even the seemingly invincible animation titan stumbled with a failure substantial enough to challenge their fundamental perspectives. The film in question, “Mars Needs Moms,” is typically classified as a science fiction adventure. With an 88-minute runtime, it promises a concise and entertaining experience suitable for all ages. However, the enjoyment quickly dissipates upon even a fleeting look at its artwork, revealing one of its most significant weaknesses.

As a movie enthusiast, I can’t help but feel queasy when faced with the hyper-realistic characters in this film. Granted, it’s not the only issue here. Even with its eerie aesthetic, films like The Polar Express manage to captivate audiences, despite their dated appearance. Sadly, the timeless charm of Rankin-Bass claymation is fading, but these films still possess compelling narratives, which is something that Disney’s flop, The Box Office Bomb, seems to have forgotten entirely.

Mars Needs Moms Had One of The Lowest Box Office Openings in Movie History

  • Despite its overall negative reception, some critics still praised its environmental design, likening it to Tron: Legacy.
  • Seth Green spent six weeks doing the motion capture work for Milo’s character.

The main problem with “Mars Needs Moms” lies in its storyline, specifically, the movie could’ve used fewer mom characters and more refined screenplay editing. Although some critics appreciated it, Simon Wells’ concept falls short of expectations. If the film had a more streamlined plot, it might have been successful. Sadly, Wells’ script doesn’t meet the mark. As suggested by its title, it offers a cloyingly sweet journey through space.

In this film, the main character, Milo (played by Seth Dusky), comes across as quite whiny for a preteen. His unnamed mother (performed by Joan Cusack) serves as the title’s matriarch and shares the same role on Mars. She embodies a typical mom figure with her warmth, kindness, and nurturing nature. Unfortunately, she gets kidnapped by Martians, who aim to leverage her “mom-ness” to improve their own parenting abilities. Meanwhile, Milo also gets taken, but he’s kept in a separate section of the spaceship. From the outset, things take a turn for the worse and continue to deteriorate further.

In a unique twist, a man named Gribble (Dan Foger) with an overabundance of enthusiasm serves as our guide through the story. A Martian nanny, Ki (Elisabeth Harnois), becomes their group’s main ally and develops feelings for Gribble. It is revealed that Martians have delegated childcare tasks to robots, leading most of them to lose touch with the idea of love. As a result, Martian leaders have been kidnapping human mothers for years, extracting their memories to improve robot-led child-rearing.

In essence, much of the storyline in this work is disclosed either via strategic murals or detailed explanations. This method isn’t unusual, but it stands out noticeably in Mars Needs Moms. More times than not, these expositions make the audience feel like they’re merely watching a single-player video game, with Milo being a passive participant within his world. The events unfolding bear resemblance to a precariously standing house of cards – it manages to remain steady, yet it lacks visual appeal.

I must admit, “Mars Needs Moms” doesn’t exactly break new ground in the world of sci-fi adventures. As a fan, it feels like the story unfolds as if it were predestined, and while there are moments that might make you shed a tear, they often come off as overly manipulative. The film lacks subtlety, opting instead to stick with what it knows, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the director has a history of creating excellent family films. However, this particular production seems content to rest on its laurels and not push any boundaries.

Maybe Mars Never Needed Moms to Begin With

Disney Lost a Ton of Money as a Result of Mars Needs Moms

  • Director Simon Wells is the great-grandson of science fiction pioneer H. G. Wells.
  • When adjusted for inflation, Mars Needs Moms is the fourth-largest box office loss in cinematic history.

Given the circumstances, it’s hardly unexpected that the movie didn’t do well, as Mars Needs Moms didn’t receive favorable reviews. The majority of feedback was critical, with viewers and critics alike criticizing its confusing narrative and artistic style. Additionally, some raised concerns about its moral implications, suggesting even model children could have their mothers taken by extraterrestrials.

One potential rephrasing could be: Another issue arises from its superficially feminist appearance. Although Milo’s mother is portrayed as the main character, viewers soon realized that the movie adheres to outdated ideological norms. The film presents the stay-at-home mom as an ideal mother figure, while depicting working-class Martian mothers as the ultimate antagonists.

After the commotion died down, the animated film “Mars Needs Moms” received some remarkably harsh criticisms. No matter how strong the criticism, it fails to encapsulate the enormity of its cost. Due to its groundbreaking motion capture technology, Disney’s 2011 financial flop carried a staggering production cost of $150 million, which dwarfs its box office earnings of $39.2 million. In the end, this unsuccessful foray into sci-fi fantasy proved to be a $110 million loss for Disney.

A Move Bad Enough to Change Animation History

Disney Immediately Pivoted Their Plans With Animation Styles

  • Disney had planned a similarly animated remake of Yellow Submarine before Mars Needs Moms’ box office failure.
  • Kevin Cahoon, the voice of Wingnut, had previously performed on Broadway as Ed in The Lion King.
  • Seth Green notes that Mars Needs Moms is one of his most physically demanding roles.

Undeniably, a loss of such magnitude carries significant consequences. Prior to the release of “Mars Needs Moms”, Disney had pinned their hopes on James Cameron’s “Avatar” as the next big thing in animation. With a substantial amount of money invested in motion capture technology, it’s not hard to see why they made that decision. After all, despite its debatable influence on pop culture, “Avatar” continues to hold its ground. Disney needed a project more impressive than “Mars Needs Moms” to keep up with the competition.

Despite its striking visual elements and advanced motion capture techniques, the movie seems to be lacking in depth. The fusion of Pixar’s distinctive style with realism appears to have weakened the physical acting within the film. Furthermore, the storyline didn’t meet the typical quality that audiences associate with Disney films. Following significant financial losses, Disney decided to move away from performance capture technology and instead focus on conventional CGI animation, a shift that was evident in their subsequent project, “Mars Needs Moms.

Disney decided to halt production of movies similar to their mo-cap experiments, and instead, animators reverted back to the conventional techniques used in Pixar productions. This shift might be advantageous overall, as it spared audiences from another mo-cap production like the critically panned “Mars Needs Moms”. The disappointing reception of that film essentially brought about the decline of the motion capture industry. Although the technology is still employed for special effects, only a few films have fully utilized it since “Mars Needs Moms”.

Read More

2025-05-04 20:06