Survivor Recap: Strong Bonds

by

What bothered me most about this episode wasn’t the competition itself, nor the modern setting, or Jeff talking about nonsensical things, and certainly not “club condo” becoming a popular term that, like “fetch,” seems unwanted. What truly irked me was outdated gameplay strategies. It feels almost quaint. I must admit, there were some new challenge aspects in this episode that I found appealing. Could it be that the production team is starting to get it? I’m not sure, but isn’t it intriguing?

The episode commences by delving into a casual discussion among competitors about which large animal they believe they could conquer. Joe, our firefighter with muscular strength, suggests he’d tackle either a retired gorilla or a farm pig that’s well-fed. Kyle claims victory over a hyena. Chrissy, in a lighthearted manner, ponders whether she could handle a gerbil, a tipsy flamingo, or a possum that plays dead – though the latter is only due to its habit of feigning death. However, it’s important to note that Chrissy didn’t actually voice these thoughts; I was merely considering how the non-muscular contestants might feel discussing such topics with all the robust men still in the competition.

In the group discussion about the animal-themed conversation, a message called Tree Mail arrives, instructing participants to form pairs for the day’s immunity challenge. There is debate over whether they should choose their partners or allow it to be random. Joe, who has been relatively quiet throughout the season, passionately argues that this decision could significantly impact their chances of winning; the choice of partner is crucial. This leads Shauhin to select Kamilla, triggering a series of events dominating the episode. When asked for his reasoning, he admits it was merely because he had been giving her admiring glances. Next, David chooses Mary, who appears to be the strategic thinker in their group. Joe picks Eva, and it seems that the other participants are passively allowing this powerful duo to thrive, which leaves me puzzled. Kyle takes Chrissy, leaving Mitch and Star, who seem to have been collectively overlooked by everyone.

The organizers pair up those who wish to collaborate, yet viewers are privy to the hidden alliance between Kyle and Kamilla, two individuals too clever to team up themselves. Regrettably, I had anticipated a twist similar to that seen in ‘Squid Game’, where contestants would have to contend with their partners, but it appears that is not the case this time around.

In this game, progress occurs through a series of rounds:

1. The initial round involves navigating a cage to gather puzzle pieces; the top three teams advance.
2. Moving on, teams construct a step puzzle and cross ropes using planks. The top two teams proceed.
3. In the final round, the remaining four players engage in a competition I call “Circle Jerk” – it’s essentially who can hold onto a pole longest. Fun fact: I came up with this name because it’s amusing!
4. This is the heart of the game. No one gets to choose; it’s not based on luck but rather the players’ subpar performance, which puts their voting power at risk. To me, this seems entirely just.

It comes as no surprise that David, Mary, Joe, and Eva have made it to the final four. However, the “Circle Jerk” challenge proved too challenging for the boys, given their bulkiness and inability to maintain balance for extended periods. On the other hand, the ladies, with a more favorable weight-to-strength ratio, manage to cling to that pole like koalas on eucalyptus trees, remaining there comfortably. Eva emerges victorious in this challenge.
In an unexpected twist at the taco reward for the finalists who excel on poles (or so it seems), Eva discovers a game advantage tucked inside her tortilla chips for use in the upcoming episode. Despite my anticipation to see the advantage unfold immediately, I was equally let down by the absence of Tostitos as the sponsor for this exciting development. Jeff, you’re missing out on some prime marketing opportunities here!

During their travels, they engage in a novel game involving a line of balls. Each participant can pick either one or two balls. There are gray balls with no significance, red ones signifying peril, and blue ones indicating someone else misses their turn. If a player collects three red balls, they lose their voting privilege. Although I’m not fond of the concept of losing votes, I find this game intriguing as it mainly tests strategy and mathematics. It compels players like Kamilla and Mitch to collaborate to ensure someone other than them loses their vote. In this instance, it was Star who lost their vote, which seems insignificant given that they haven’t contributed much during the entire episode. Knowing she required votes for her strategy to work, Kamilla was wise, but she should have tried to prevent Shauhin from getting votes as Star appeared to be a swing vote at this stage of the game.

When the group that’s losing and the group that’s winning are having their respective troubles – the losing four have diarrhea due to eating tacos after fasting for two weeks, while the winning four keep winning due to a strategic alliance and Eva possesses an idol – Kyle and Chrissy find themselves alone at the camp. In this moment, Chrissy suggests they should split up Joe and Eva because if they continue to win together, it will be harder to defeat them. However, everyone else, including Kyle, is hesitant about this idea as they are part of the Strong Five alliance.

Perhaps it’s monotonous to have the powerful contestants consistently winning, as they would likely breeze through all challenges, eliminating weaker players each week. The journey to the finale might become a tiresome march rather than an exciting competition. Moreover, one might question whether these strong players have given thought to their strategy. If the final challenge demands brute strength, Shauhin and Eva may struggle against David and Joe. While all four are strong and reliable, if they continue with this approach, how can this game stand out from others? It seems ill-advised to play the game in such a manner, especially considering the era of Survivor.

One thought that resonated with me from Chrissy during tribal council: She’s determined to eliminate the dominant players, giving underdogs like herself a better chance. That’s why I strongly oppose this alliance of powerhouses. It seems like Survivor often values a certain style of gameplay, focusing on strength over other essential traits such as politics, alliance-building, cunningness, deceit, and emotional intelligence. For instance, consider how Eva obtained an advantage in the challenge that relied on strength. Why not offer this during a puzzle? Once more, it appears that those with raw power are being favored over individuals with other skills, similar to what we observed in the last episode.

As a die-hard fan of Survivor, I can’t help but notice how the game has consistently favored certain contestants over others. Take Ben Driebergen, for instance, who was showered with idols and given a fire-making challenge to win. Or Boston Rob, who kept getting a second chance just to secure another victory. Then there’s Jeff Probst himself, mentioning that the show lacks as many intriguing female characters as it does male ones. It seems like Chrissy is battling not only her tribe mates but also the very fabric and biases of the Survivor franchise itself.

At the tribal council meeting, she climbed onto a proverbial podium and urged everyone to target the more powerful players. David was visibly upset, as if someone had proposed a 340% tariff on chocolate milk. “This is the one season when the strong ones say they’ve had enough,” he remarked, “and yet she’s causing a fuss. It seems like every other season, we’ve been used as pawns… while everyone else forms alliances, but not us.

It’s really disappointing when the show consistently favors the stronger contestants in the early stages, often resulting in the elimination of women and older individuals. Research by psychologist Erin O’Mara Kunz shows that compared to men, women have a higher chance of being eliminated first, a lower likelihood of reaching the individual competition stage, and a lower chance of winning overall. It seems ironic that David is upset about potentially being considered too strong when the show has a history of this very issue. Perhaps it’s time for a change in seating arrangements – stand up, take your seat again, and then do it all over once more.

Instead of focusing on future events, let’s discuss the current situation. Kyle is supposed to inform the Strong Five that Chrissy plans to target Joe. Meanwhile, David and Mary, particularly Mary, have a problem with Kamilla. The issue lies in their suspicion that Shauhin may collaborate with her, which they don’t trust. Instead of weakening him, it would be more beneficial for them to remove him from the game completely, as keeping someone untrusted around only gives them an opportunity to deceive again.

Kamilla’s decision is puzzling to Kyle because he doesn’t want his ally kicked out. He makes strong arguments to keep her, especially since she now votes with them. Instead, why not get rid of Chrissy who consistently votes against them? It seems odd that David, who can’t think strategically at all, is there to participate in challenges rather than play Survivor.

Kyle suspects that Kamilla and David might be collaborating. Despite everyone deciding to eliminate Kamilla because she won’t anticipate it, will she realize this next week? What advantage does surprise bring them when they are already the dominant alliance and can do as they please? They don’t need to catch her off guard; they have the power to act freely.

At the tribe, Chrissy takes a significant risk by targeting the powerful males. David reacts angrily, leading to her elimination by a vote. However, the shift in tribal dynamics remains unclear because either Joe and Kyle discuss flipping their votes or Chrissy’s bold move causes a sudden change of heart among all players without any discussion. This season may be losing its excitement, as I find myself disliking the contestants instead of the game itself for the first time.

Read More

2025-04-17 05:56