Gene Hackman Remembered: How the ’70s Acting Legend Left His Mark and Shaped ‘The Conversation’

by

Among the most prominent American actors who made their mark in the late 1960s, revolutionizing the acting world with an intense, profound dedication to their art, are Al Pacino, Jack Nicholson, Dustin Hoffman, and Gene Hackman. These four individuals stand out.

As the oldest member of that group, I, Hackman, am less recognized by today’s youth due to my retirement from acting over two decades ago. Instead, I chose to focus on writing and painting in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Throughout a span of four decades in the film industry, I, being a stage-trained actor, predominantly starred in mature movies catering to adult audiences (with the notable exception of my unforgettable role as Lex Luthor in the “Superman” series). If not for my memorable portrayal as the stern patriarch in Wes Anderson’s beloved film “The Royal Tenenbaums,” I might have been completely overlooked by Generation Z.

The sudden and unconventional demise of Hackman, found alongside his wife and pet, provides an opportunity to reminisce about a towering, dynamic actor who effortlessly transitioned between leading roles and character parts. He had the ability to elicit hearty laughter – be it as the blind hermit in “Young Frankenstein,” Buck Barrow in “Bonnie and Clyde,” or a conservative senator forced into cross-dressing due to a scandal in “The Birdcage” – yet, his best performances were in more serious roles. He excelled at portraying men who were almost broken by their dedication to their obligations. This is evident in films like “The French Connection,” “Night Moves,” “The Conversation,” and even the resilient small-town coach he played a decade later in “Hoosiers.

The star had an exceptional ability to steal scenes from legendary actors of the 70’s, yet preferred to express a character’s underlying motivations or fears through subtle facial expressions and changes in tone. Pacino, who played his friend in “Scarecrow,” and Hoffman, who lived with Hackman during their early years in New York, held immense respect for this sensitive and contemplative individual, who brought to life some of the most intense and self-destructive characters in contemporary cinema, from the relentless and drug-addicted “French Connection” detective Jimmy Doyle to the power-hungry sheriff Little Bill in “Unforgiven” (1992).

In a different yet clear way, let me rephrase that for you:
He won Oscars for two films, but he was equally compelling as the captain of an apocalyptic submarine in “Crimson Tide” and a corrupt defense secretary in “No Way Out”. These roles showcase his ability to make a strong impact without overshadowing the younger stars. He could elevate ordinary movies (such as “Absolute Power”, “Extreme Measures”, or “Runaway Jury”) simply by being part of them, yet it’s his work from the 1970s that stands out the most. In films like “Scarecrow” and “Prime Cut,” where he played Max (a scruffy human drifter) and Mary Ann (his first notable villain), there is no trace of ego, as he seamlessly became part of these characters.

Actors like Hackman, who emerged during the same era, experienced their formative years when a significant shift occurred in Hollywood – not through a scientific breakthrough like the atomic bomb or thermonuclear weapon, but rather through the groundbreaking performance of Marlon Brando in “A Streetcar Named Desire.” This impact was felt on Broadway and later in films. Actors such as James Dean, Warren Beatty, and others who followed, were all influenced by Brando’s acting style. However, I have often pondered that the role which truly defined Hackman’s career – portraying Harry Caul, the surveillance expert, in Francis Ford Coppola’s Oscar-winning film “The Conversation” – is comparable to the powerful performance Brando delivered two years prior in “The Godfather.

In contrast to the suave, glamorous image of secret agents portrayed by characters like James Bond, Hackman’s character in “The Conversation” presents an entirely different picture. His retreating hairline and modest demeanor set him apart from the typical Hollywood-created secret agent archetype. Behind his wireframe glasses and cheap plastic raincoat, Caul appears more like a bookworm than a suave spy: awkward with women, uneasy in social situations, and haunted by the remorse of a past mission. Unlike Bond, who never seemed to care about his victims, Hackman’s character exposed the tormented conscience of a troubled government employee caught up in a much bigger conspiracy. This film was released in 1974, just two years after the Watergate scandal, which added an extra layer of realism and relevance to the story.

As a film enthusiast, I discovered that legendary editor Walter Murch crafted his work with a unique approach, realizing that many cuts in “The Conversation” occurred precisely when Harry Hackman’s character blinked. Despite Francis Ford Coppola’s quiet masterpiece delving into the world of eavesdropping and exploring Caul’s obsessive quest to unravel an ambiguous impending crime, it was Hackman’s portrayal of a tormented antihero that truly encapsulated the human price of moral compromise.

Hackman frequently referred to himself as an “action-driven actor,” not in the sense of physically fighting or saving the day, but rather by expressing his characters through their actions. For instance, he might obsessively rewind incriminating tapes or tear up floorboards in his apartment that were bugged. Consider the unique interrogation scene in “Mississippi Burning,” where Hackman’s FBI agent questions a local law enforcement officer (Brad Dourif) while simultaneously giving him a shave with a straight razor. This scene was not written by Hackman, but he imbued it with an unpredictable intensity, leaving even his partner (Willem Dafoe) unsure of how the situation would unfold.

Filmmaker Alexander Payne attempted to persuade him to come out of retirement for the movie “Nebraska”, as he had written the role in “About Schmidt” with Hackman in mind several years prior. However, the actor opted to maintain his personal privacy instead. He found interviews challenging and was often uneasy discussing his work. Yet, despite this, he had a deep understanding of human behavior, which is intriguing given that his character in “The Conversation” claimed not to understand curiosity. Nevertheless, Hackman’s character’s assertion rings false when you examine any one of the numerous roles in his esteemed film career, as it seems that genuine curiosity was a significant part of what he brought to each performance.

Read More

2025-02-28 02:46