Why The SEC Needs to Allow Staking in Exchange-Traded Products

by

Ah, the U.S. and its love-hate relationship with staking. For too long, we’ve been the awkward kid at the global crypto party, standing in the corner while Switzerland and Canada show off their staking moves. And now, just 30 days into the Trump Administration, staking is suddenly the belle of the ball, mentioned in Congressional hearings like it’s the latest TikTok trend. Who knew? 🎉

Last September, when the first spot ether ETFs were approved, it was like watching a toddler take its first steps—adorable, but also a little concerning. Sure, it was a leap for the second-largest cryptocurrency, but wait! There’s a glaring omission: the ability to stake those assets. It’s like buying a car and realizing it doesn’t have wheels. 🚗💨

Enter our bipartisan group of lawmakers, a veritable Avengers team of Senators, including the likes of Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand. They’re on a mission to challenge the SEC’s outdated stance on staking in ETPs. It’s like watching a group of parents trying to convince a stubborn child that broccoli is, in fact, good for them. 🥦

The SEC’s prohibition on staking is based on a misunderstanding of how proof-of-stake networks work. Staking isn’t just a fancy investment product; it’s the backbone of network security. When token holders stake their assets, they’re not just sitting pretty; they’re helping to keep the whole operation running smoothly. It’s like being the designated driver at a party—noble, but not exactly glamorous. 🍸

International competitiveness

Meanwhile, while the U.S. is busy twiddling its thumbs, other countries are embracing staking like it’s the latest fashion trend. Switzerland, Canada, Germany, and Australia are all in on the action, recognizing that staking is crucial for network security. Just last month, the U.K. issued a statutory instrument saying that crypto asset staking doesn’t count as a collective investment scheme. It’s like they’re saying, “Hey, we get it!” while the U.S. is still trying to figure out how to tie its shoes. 👟

If no one is staking their ether, guess what? All those assets in ETPs are at risk. So, the SEC has effectively put American investors in a position where their investments are only safe if they’re held in other countries. It’s like saying, “You can’t play in the sandbox, but feel free to watch the other kids have fun.” 🏖️

This misguided regulation doesn’t just affect Ethereum; it could also impact future ETPs for other networks like Solana and Polkadot. As the digital asset sector grows, so does the potential for this regulatory blunder to deepen. It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck, and we’re all just standing there, popcorn in hand. 🍿

Getting this regulation wrong is a lose-lose for American investors and the economy. They can either accept domestic products without staking (yawn) or seek out offshore alternatives, which is like choosing between a soggy sandwich and a five-star meal. Without staking, ether ETP holders are slowly losing their grip on the network. It’s like watching your favorite TV show get canceled—devastating. 📺

This economic reality makes U.S. products less appealing to investors. Ironically, this outcome seems to contradict the SEC’s mission of protecting investors, likely pushing them toward investment vehicles in other jurisdictions that might not have the same safety nets. It’s like being told to swim in shark-infested waters without a life jacket. 🦈

The technical risks of staking, when managed by savvy validators, are minimal. The infamous “slashing risk” has affected a mere 0.001 percent of staked ether. So, the SEC’s cautious approach might be a bit over the top—like wearing a hazmat suit to a dinner party. 🍽️

What’s at stake

As we wait for the SEC to respond to Congress, American investors are left in the lurch. The way forward requires a balanced approach that recognizes staking for what it is—a technical necessity for network security—while ensuring proper oversight. It’s like trying to find the right balance between being a helicopter parent and letting your kids ride

Read More

2025-02-21 21:30