Smite Update: Community Reactions to the November 15th, 2024 2LDR

As a seasoned gamer with decades of gaming under my belt, I’ve witnessed the evolution of Smite from its humble beginnings to the vibrant MOBA it is today. The upcoming 2LDR announcement has sparked a flurry of emotions within me and the community, much like a kid on Christmas Eve awaiting Santa’s arrival.


There’s been a fresh burst of anticipation and debate surrounding Smite, following the reveal of its upcoming 2LDR on November 15th, 2024. The Smite subreddit has been buzzing with lively discussions among players, expressing everything from excitement to apprehension about the changes this update will bring, particularly in terms of character designs and gameplay tweaks. The community seems eager to share their expectations for the future of their beloved gods, whether it’s the introduction of new pantheons or modifications to cherished abilities. A mix of optimism and caution pervades as players ponder what this update could mean for their gaming experience.

SMITE 2LDR | November 15th, 2024
byu/BluesUltra inSmite

Summary

  • Community excitement is tempered by concerns over design choices, particularly regarding the Brazilian Pantheon and character inclusions.
  • Players are wary of mechanics like glyphs returning, with some nostalgia for more straightforward items.
  • Some character-specific feedback reveals emotional attachments, especially among dedicated mains feeling overlooked.
  • Overall sentiment ranges from anticipation to frustration, reflecting a passionate player base deeply invested in Smite’s evolution.

Pantheon Ponderings

One of the most discussed topics emerging from the 2LDR post is the Brazilian Pantheon, particularly the missing character Izanagi. User Gharbin1616 encapsulated this sentiment by comparing the situation to the Greeks lack of Zeus, hinting at the idea that players feel a fundamental disconnect when iconic figures from mythology are left out of the game. The comment highlights a broader concern among the player base regarding inclusivity and representation. It raises questions like, “Why would the developers sidestep such an opportunity?” I mean, if you’re diving into different pantheons, surely the big names should be a given! Players expressed a desire for greater depth in the game’s mythological portrayals, seeking to engage with rich narratives rather than just showcased characters. This desire for variety hints that fans want Smite’s universe to feel truly expansive—and that means more mythological heavyweights on the battlefield!

Skincare for Gods: Skin and Equipment Discussions

The recent Titan Talk, highlighted by LoneWolf1ngIt, sparked an engaging discussion about skin acquisition and usage rates. Players are concerned that certain skins might overshadow others in terms of popularity, especially those linked to battle passes that have a robust ownership base. The post emphasized that ownership alone shouldn’t determine a skin’s presence in Smite, leading to worries from players who feel some of their favorites could be neglected. A game as vibrant as Smite thrives on diversity, and limiting players to just what’s popular can feel exclusionary. The balance between player preference and developer choices remains a delicate dance, and while players appreciate that Hi-Rez is considering equipment rates, many are still hopeful that traditional fan favorites aren’t lost in the shuffle.

Mechanics: Back to The Future?

MagicFighter echoes a common sentiment among gamers: they hope that excessive T4 items, such as the troublesome yellow Breastplate, won’t resurface. The initial confusing traits, like multiple active abilities on items, have left some players with mixed feelings—a bit of nostalgia for simpler times and a tad jaded. As the game advances and introduces new features, it’s clear that players crave simplicity and balance—avoiding overloading them with too many options that could lead to annoyance rather than excitement. They desire their equipment to augment their gaming experience without making it overly complex or a colorful chaos. For many, clarity and enjoyment are closely linked, so here’s hoping Hi-Rez takes this into account!

Character Design Dilemmas

Character aesthetics are a hot topic in many game communities, and Smite is no exception. A notable contribution from Lychee316 lamented the possible retention of the Smite 1 design for Aphrodite, arguing that dedicated players deserve a say in the design of their favorite gods. A recurring theme emerges here whereby authenticity is a strong driving force for many players; being a long-time player often comes with an emotional bond to featured characters. Taking this into account, the loud voices of a few can undermine those who play specific gods extensively. There’s a palpable frustration when community votes and preferences clash, especially for players who feel they’re not adequately represented in the ongoing design dialogue.

The Smite community is undoubtedly a colorful tapestry of emotions and perspectives as it navigates the winds of change brought about by the upcoming update. With opinions ranging from excitement over new characters to the trepidation surrounding familiar mechanics and designs, it’s clear that players are heavily invested in the direction being taken. Their hopes and concerns reflect their deep engagement with both the lore and mechanics of the game. As the November 15th release date approaches, the developers at Hi-Rez have the chance to align with their community’s desires and bolster player trust. Listening to feedback—especially from those who dedicate time and energy into mastering characters—can provide valuable insights to ensure that Smite remains an inclusive and exciting experience for all players.

Read More

2024-11-16 05:43