5 Words Quietly Explained Game of Thrones’ Entire Ending in the Finale (& Everyone Missed It)

by

Even six years later, the ending of the show remains highly debated among fans, with many feeling unsatisfied and left with unanswered questions. The final season attempted to address this disappointment, offering a critique of the show’s own narrative choices and justifying the rushed conclusion of several storylines. During the selection of a ruler for the newly formed Six Kingdoms of Westeros, Tyrion Lannister, fearing punishment for his actions regarding Daenerys Targaryen, famously argued that Bran the Broken was the most fitting choice, questioning, “What better story could there be?”

Tyrion’s speech aimed to analyze the core themes of Game of Thrones, particularly how wealth and power inevitably lead to corruption, while also arguing that stories themselves are ultimately the most enduring and truthful things. He believed Brandon Stark, with his dramatic journey from a fall to becoming the all-knowing Three-Eyed Raven, possessed the strongest story and would therefore be the best ruler to restore the kingdom. While the idea that someone who doesn’t crave power is best suited to build a better world was a strong point, the final episode didn’t effectively demonstrate this idea.

Game of Thrones’ Final Message Was Unearned

While the show generally excelled at creating its world and developing its characters, the final season still fell short. The creators faced a difficult task: deciding how the war would conclude, who would ultimately rule, and how the entire story would transform the world established in the first season. No matter who they chose as the new ruler, some fans were bound to be disappointed. Some expected Daenerys to win, others rooted for a surprising victory by Cersei, and many hoped Jon Snow (revealed to be Aegon Targaryen) would take the throne.

Honestly, when they made Brandon Stark king, it felt like a real shock. But the showrunners tried to spin it as if it was inevitable all along. And you know who did most of the heavy lifting in justifying it? Tyrion Lannister. He’d served as Hand to both Joffrey and Daenerys, and seen firsthand how power corrupts. So they used him to explain to everyone – both the characters in Westeros and us viewers – that Bran being chosen wasn’t about him wanting power. Instead, it was about the core idea of the whole show: the stories we tell. They argued that Bran, as ‘Bran the Broken,’ best embodied that theme, making him the logical choice over those who were simply hungry for the throne.

The debate over who should rule Westeros and why felt empty. While Bran’s history was fascinating and a beloved part of the show, his storyline didn’t quite work in the final season. He was safe throughout the fight with the Night King, but after returning to Winterfell, he remained in the background, only occasionally offering cryptic advice based on his visions. By the time the leaders voted him king, the show hadn’t shown us why Bran deserved the throne. Instead, it relied on Tyrion to tell the audience why the story ended that way, rather than demonstrating Bran’s worthiness through his actions.

Game of Thrones Collapses Under Its Own Meta-commentary

Game of Thrones became incredibly popular because of its shocking and unpredictable storylines, which felt true to the characters’ journeys. The Season 1 finale, particularly Ned Stark’s execution, is now legendary, establishing the show’s tone for what was to come. Lord Stark represented traditional morality, and his death demonstrated that idealism doesn’t survive in this world. Moments like the Red Wedding and the death of Drogo – right as he was changing harmful customs – reinforced the show’s realistic and often brutal portrayal of power and politics.

The show consistently engaged viewers by staying true to its characters and plot, delivering realistic consequences instead of simply giving audiences what they wanted. A prime example of its strong storytelling is Joffrey Baratheon’s wedding day poisoning and what happened afterward. While Joffrey’s death was a satisfying moment, it led to hardship for characters like Tyrion and put Joffrey’s young brother, Tommen, in a vulnerable position where power-hungry adults exploited his naiveté. These events established a pattern for the rest of the series, showcasing a grim but believable depiction of life in Westeros.

While the early seasons of Game of Thrones were praised for their intricate characters, surprising twists, and complex world-building, the show’s quality noticeably dropped in its final seasons, particularly Season 8. The creators seemed to prioritize a tidy ending for fans, but this resulted in a rushed and unsatisfying conclusion. Key characters weren’t given the development they deserved, and the show’s nuanced political and social themes were simplified to serve the plot. What was once a critically acclaimed series ultimately felt reduced to a predictable finale, complete with an explanatory monologue to justify its straightforward ending.

The Questionable Storytelling Led to the Show’s Decline

As a huge fantasy fan, I really think Game of Thrones showed just how powerful the genre can be – building a completely believable world that also held a mirror up to our own political struggles. It’s a shame, though, because for a lot of us, the show’s magic kind of disappeared with the very last season. While some people defend the ending, I think the finale sacrificed all the careful plotting and character development that made the show so great, and it ultimately felt rushed and unsatisfying. It’s like they were so focused on trying to subvert expectations that they ended up losing the story’s heart.

Politics were central to the entire series, from the revelation of the true parentage of Robert Baratheon’s heirs to Robb Stark’s fight for Northern independence. While some characters seemed destined to win, events like Robb’s murder and Cersei’s rise to power showed that strength, not fate, determined outcomes. The finale could have reinforced this idea by placing a deserving leader in power, but instead, it chose a surprising candidate. This ultimately undermined the series’ political themes, framing the entire storyline as simply a setup for a narrative twist rather than a meaningful commentary on power and politics.

I loved this show for so long, but the final season really disappointed me. It felt like they were desperately trying to justify the rushed relationship between Jon and Daenerys, and painting Daenerys as cruel didn’t feel natural or believable. Even worse, characters like Jamie Lannister went through huge changes, only for those changes to be undone with flimsy explanations right at the end. Up until the Battle of King’s Landing, everything felt earned and meaningful, but the conclusion just felt…off. It’s a shame, because the journey was incredible, but it didn’t stick the landing.

The show tried to justify its final choices in Game of Thrones through Tyrion’s speech when deciding Westeros’s new ruler, ultimately hinging on the idea of who had the more compelling story. Ironically, the character who ended up as king was the one best suited to lead, despite remaining largely silent throughout the discussion and simply agreeing with Tyrion’s suggestion. However, the show missed an opportunity to make this outcome believable by abandoning the political complexities it had established, opting instead for easy and straightforward resolutions for its characters and plot.

Read More

2025-11-16 21:10