You’re able to view the outcomes of those rankings as well, and here on ScreenCrush, we’ve got articles where you can easily scan through Letterboxd’s top and bottom films. However, it’s important to note that Letterboxd has millions of users, and they don’t always see eye-to-eye about what makes a film great or terrible. This discrepancy is the focus of today’s discussion.
The movie’s producer, Andrew Macdonald, shared with Empire Magazine that director Danny Boyle had hoped to bring back Cillian Murphy from the original film “28 Days Later” (released in 2002) for this new film. Unfortunately, plans didn’t materialize this time around. However, there’s a possibility that Murphy could join the cast of one of the upcoming sequels being developed currently.
The building was destroyed due to the persistent Los Angeles fires, which originated in the Pacific Palisades region.
However, a particular element in the film sparked differing opinions, even amongst those who generally enjoyed it: The depiction of the late actor Ian Holm, essentially resurrecting his character from the initial Alien movie, as he portrayed the ominous android Ash.
The director of the 51-year-old, who made the 2023 DC Comics movie, believes the superhero film didn’t do well because it failed to draw in a large enough number of viewers.
Prior to their upcoming confrontation, EbMaster held discussions with both Valkyria and Kai, a conversation that occurred before the latest stir caused by “Monday Night Raw” transitioning from traditional TV broadcast to streaming on Netflix.
As I scrolled through the comments section, my heart raced when I first caught sight of the fresh new skin. One user perfectly captured the shock and thrill with a clever remark and a GIF that read, “me when I saw the fine print.” It’s obvious that the look of it really resonated with many on a surface level, unleashing the hidden fashion-forward gamer in all of us. But, this eye-catching debut came with a heavy emotional toll. Amidst the cheers and GIFs, there were voices of concern, with one commenter questioning, “We got the skin, but at what cost?” This back-and-forth demonstrates that while the skin was visually impressive, it sparked caution when considering the game’s economic side or possible imbalances in gameplay.
The forums are full of discussions showing a strong desire among players for better game stability in Skull and Bones. Many users have been annoyed by ongoing server problems since the game’s launch, and one user summed it up when they said, “Couldn’t they just fix these constant disconnections already?” This is a recurring topic within the community as players want to engage in thrilling pirate adventures without getting booted off their ship, especially during intense battles. Stability, as another commenter pointed out, serves as a crucial foundation for a game like this. They suggested that improving quality control and speeding up bug fixes would be well-received by the player base, creating a more enjoyable experience. To put it simply, what’s the point of sailing the seven seas if you can’t stay on the ship to appreciate the scenery?
In simpler terms, Serious-Drawing-2863’s post expresses concern and confusion about Skull and Bones’ currency system. The author is worried that their accumulated Azure Gems (7,000) and Po8 (100,000) might disappear when the shop resets. This uncertainty stems from a lack of clarity regarding how the game’s currency resets are tied to seasons and the shop’s operational times. Players are asking for transparency, but it seems that clear information is hard to come by as there has been no official announcement about what will happen to these currencies with upcoming updates. Beyond the seasonal issues, the underlying issue appears to be about accountability from the game developers in terms of their communication, or lack thereof, on matters that directly impact their players.