The White House crypto talks have raised alarm among banking groups, which have cautioned that the stablecoin laws may cripple local lending and spearhead deposits of small-town banks.
A joint statement by five larger banking trade groups came after the meeting with the White House regarding the structure of cryptocurrency markets on Tuesday. Imagine a group of bankers in a room, collectively sweating like they just lost a bet to a crypto bro.
It was attended by the American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, Financial Services Forum, and Independent Community Bankers of America. Because nothing says “teamwork” like five organizations with a shared goal of not losing their lunch money.
The banking coalition thanked the administration as they got their view on board. They focused on securing local lending to families and small businesses. The groups emphasized financial system safety and health. Because nothing says “safety” like a system that can’t even agree on what “safe” means.
Crypto vs. Banks: Clash of Strategies
According to Brendan Pedersen on X, the meeting unveiled sharp contrasts between the industries. Crypto representatives were ready with certain solutions to yield using stablecoins, and banking trade representatives did not insist on discussions and offered no separate solutions. It’s like trying to negotiate with a wall-except the wall is also holding a grudge.
Folks in the room of WH crypto-bank meeting have told me the two industries had very different approaches to initial negotiations.
Crypto reps wanted to talk specific potential solutions on yield. Bank trade reps mostly avoided details, did not want to discuss discrete solutions
– Brendan Pedersen (@BrendanPedersen)
Source: BrendanPedersen
The comparison was made of the deep rifts regarding digital asset laws. Banks seek insurance to safeguard the old deposit methods of lending. Bitcoin supporters advoc on stablecoin systems with interest. Because nothing says “innovation” like a system that’s basically a glorified savings account.
You might also like: HKMA to Issue First Stablecoin Licences in March, Few Approvals Expected
Stablecoin Threat to Community Lending
Banks’ conglomerates have become fierce opponents of interest-earning stablecoins. A recent study by ICBA cautions that this type of legislation would cut the community bank lending by $850.billion. That’s enough money to fund a small country’s entire infrastructure… and still have change for a latte.
Conventional banks depend on deposits to finance local business loans. This source of funds may be drained away by interest-bearing stablecoins. Deposit flight is especially susceptible to community banks. Because nothing says “community” like a bank that’s terrified of a little competition.
The banking coalition issued several research articles about stablecoin risks. BPI published reports with the titles Stablecoin Risks: Some Warning Bells and The Risks of Allowing Stablecoins to Pay Interest. Opinions in joint letters called on Congress to seal loopholes in stablecoins. Because if there’s one thing bankers love, it’s a good loophole.
Banking leaders informed the White House officials that the legislation had to shield local lending. They vowed to collaborate with the legislators in consideration of the digital-asset policy. The sector signifies property worth 25.1 trillion and spreads 13.2 trillion worth of loans. Because nothing says “trust” like a system that’s worth more than the entire GDP of a small nation.
Read More
- All Golden Ball Locations in Yakuza Kiwami 3 & Dark Ties
- NBA 2K26 Season 5 Adds College Themed Content
- Hollywood is using “bounty hunters” to track AI companies misusing IP
- What time is the Single’s Inferno Season 5 reunion on Netflix?
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Brent Oil Forecast
- Exclusive: First Look At PAW Patrol: The Dino Movie Toys
- Heated Rivalry Adapts the Book’s Sex Scenes Beat by Beat
- EUR INR PREDICTION
- He Had One Night to Write the Music for Shane and Ilya’s First Time
2026-02-03 19:23