tag, not repeated in the body. Also, images need to stay in place. Adding humor and sarcasm is key. First, the original title is “Bitcoin consolidates as sentiment cracks again! Recovery to $100K IF…”. Needs to be clickbaity and short. Maybe something like “Bitcoin: The Great Wallet-Watch of 2026 – Will It or Won’t It?” which is under 100 characters. Next, the body text. Each paragraph should be infused with Pratchett-like wit. For example, instead of “Macro anxiety continued to dominate markets…”, maybe something like “Ah, macro anxiety, the party crasher of the financial world…” Need to ensure images are retained with their existing classes and sources. Also, avoid using tags as headers but keep the structure. Maybe use with bold text instead. Check for any or lists and convert them into a more narrative form with humor. The final thoughts section can be turned into a witty conclusion with bullet points still present but phrased in a Pratchett-esque way. Make sure the humor and sarcasm are consistent throughout, poking fun at the market’s indecisiveness and the whole Bitcoin situation. Use metaphors like “financial yo-yo” or “nervous squirrel” to add that touch. Avoid any markdown, stick to HTML tags allowed. No colors or styles. Ensure the title is only in the tag and not repeated. Check character count for the title. Finally, review the entire HTML to ensure all images are placed correctly, no span tags, and the style matches Terry Pratchett’s narrative wit and sarcasm. End of Thought (11.97s) Bitcoin: The Great Wallet-Watch of 2026 – Will It or Won’t It? January 2026 rolled in like a nervous squirrel clutching a handful of acorns, muttering about “macro anxiety” as if the term hadn’t been flogged to death by every financial pundit since the dawn of time. Markets quivered. Bitcoin, ever the drama queen, soaked it all in like a sponge soaked in existential dread… but didn’t actually die. How dramatic. Prices huddled near support levels like a shy kid at a disco, while fear cranked up to “slightly worried but still checking Twitter” levels. No capitulation, though. Just a bunch of traders staring at screens, thinking, “Is this the part where it crashes? Or do we… politely disagree?” Selling pressure slinked off for a smoke break. Prices reversed like a confused cab driver and stabilized-hovering just above the emotional wreckage of long-term holders who’d sworn off therapy. Buyers, spotting an opportunity to play hero, mopped up supply and nudged prices higher. Modestly, mind you. No need to get greedy. This wasn’t a rally; it was a shrug. Then came the $90,000s. Overhead supply thickened like poorly stirred gravy. New buyers tripped over their own FOMO, momentum face-planted, and risk skewed downside like a wobbly carnival ride. Mood? Better, but defensive. Volatility? Still the uninvited guest hogging the punch bowl. Markets tiptoed back to “meh,” with crypto traders dusting off their old “buy the dip” T-shirts. Trends hinted at balance, as if the entire ecosystem had collectively agreed to stop panicking long enough to reassess their life choices. Investors? Busy Googling “how to unsee a chart pattern.” Bitcoin stabilizes amid selective corporate treasury flows Corporate treasuries dabbled in Bitcoin like it was a questionable buffet dish-nibbling occasionally, then retreating. Spikes in inflows coincided with dips, because nothing says “strategic vision” like buying low and immediately regretting it. Demand? Tactical. As in, “We’ll take a few bags now, but our lawyers are very concerned.” Outflows? Minimal. Because nothing says confidence like refusing to touch the panic button. Sentiment hovered at “neutral with a side of sarcasm.” No sustained buying, though. Just macro conditions playing DJ, mixing tracks of risk tolerance and bad life decisions. Sentiment cracks again! Is Bitcoin still trapped by 2025 supply? The Buy/Sell Pressure Delta stayed negative longer than a goth teenager’s Instagram caption. Rallies sputtered like a lawnmower in a thunderstorm. Red zones expanded, distribution returned, and traders muttered, “Here we go again,” into their overpriced coffee. Selling? Sentiment-driven, not apocalypse-driven. Buyers? Still there, but “conviction” had left the building. For a turnaround, selling pressure needed to ease. Until then, markets waited like a DMV line-numb, sluggish, and quietly furious. Sentiment? Bearish enough to make a economist cry. Rallies fizzled like flat soda. Sellers still called the shots, despite price holding steady. It wasn’t fear-it was 2025’s leftover supply, still hogging the dance floor. Final Thoughts (because even Bitcoin needs an intermission) Bitcoin’s consolidation isn’t about panic-it’s 2025’s ghost haunting the crypto attic. Price holds structure, sell pressure slows, but fear? Still scribbling notes in the margin. Upside’s capped until demand grows a spine and replaces tactical nibbles with actual hunger. Look for flow metrics to flirt with positivity and sentiment to stop being so dramatic.