Predictive Power: A Universal Model for Virtual Sensors

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

Researchers have developed a new foundation model capable of efficiently forecasting time series data from a variety of virtual sensors, offering a significant advance over existing methods.

Instead of training and maintaining separate models for each virtual sensor, a unified approach integrates multiple sensors into a single system, leveraging inherent relationships to achieve greater scalability and efficiency while simultaneously enhancing interpretability without requiring specialized expertise.
Instead of training and maintaining separate models for each virtual sensor, a unified approach integrates multiple sensors into a single system, leveraging inherent relationships to achieve greater scalability and efficiency while simultaneously enhancing interpretability without requiring specialized expertise.

This work introduces a unified transformer-based architecture that leverages signal relevance and sparsity to achieve scalable and efficient inference for virtual sensor applications.

Traditional virtual sensor approaches demand bespoke models and manual input selection, hindering scalability and knowledge transfer. This limitation motivates the development of ‘A Foundation Model for Virtual Sensors’, which introduces a unified architecture capable of simultaneously predicting diverse sensor outputs while autonomously learning relevant input signals. By leveraging shared representations, our model achieves a 415\times reduction in computation and a 951\times reduction in memory requirements compared to existing methods-all without sacrificing predictive performance. Could this represent a paradigm shift towards broadly applicable, efficient, and self-adapting sensor networks?

The Inevitable Limits of Physicality

The pervasive deployment of physical sensors – essential for monitoring everything from infrastructure health to environmental conditions – frequently encounters practical limitations. Establishing and maintaining a dense network of these devices involves substantial financial investment, not only for the units themselves, but also for installation, calibration, and ongoing repairs. Furthermore, many environments present spatial constraints, making it difficult or impossible to physically position sensors where they are most needed. Harsh conditions, remote locations, or the sheer scale of certain systems – such as power grids or extensive pipelines – compound these challenges, leading to incomplete data acquisition and hindering a truly comprehensive understanding of the monitored phenomena. These logistical and economic hurdles often necessitate a shift towards more efficient and scalable data gathering techniques.

Virtual sensing represents a paradigm shift in data acquisition, moving beyond reliance on dedicated hardware to leverage the wealth of information already captured by existing time series data. Rather than deploying additional physical sensors – a process often constrained by budgetary, spatial, or logistical challenges – this technique employs computational algorithms to infer critical signals. These algorithms analyze correlations, patterns, and dependencies within pre-existing datasets – such as those collected from power grids, manufacturing processes, or environmental monitoring systems – to estimate variables that would otherwise require direct measurement. The power lies in its ability to create a ‘digital twin’ of a physical phenomenon, enabling real-time insights and predictive capabilities without the expense and complexity of traditional sensor networks. This computational derivation allows for the monitoring of parameters that are difficult, dangerous, or simply impossible to measure directly with conventional methods, opening new avenues for optimization and control.

The emergence of virtual sensing dramatically expands the scope of data acquisition, enabling continuous monitoring and predictive capabilities in environments previously inaccessible to traditional methods. Consider scenarios like tracking traffic flow across an entire city – deploying physical sensors at every intersection proves economically and logistically prohibitive. Virtual sensors, however, can computationally infer traffic density and predict congestion by analyzing data from existing sources – such as GPS data from mobile phones or aggregated speed reports. This principle extends to diverse fields, including structural health monitoring of bridges – where internal stresses can be estimated from external vibration data – and even medical diagnostics, where physiological parameters can be derived from non-invasive imaging techniques. By leveraging the power of data analytics and computational modeling, virtual sensing transcends the limitations of physical infrastructure, offering a cost-effective and scalable solution for real-time insights and proactive decision-making.

On the Traffic dataset, the sensor selection mechanism effectively adapts to varying temporal patterns by dynamically switching between virtual sensors.
On the Traffic dataset, the sensor selection mechanism effectively adapts to varying temporal patterns by dynamically switching between virtual sensors.

The Ghost in the Machine: Foundation Models Emerge

The implementation of a foundation model for virtual sensing represents a shift from traditional, task-specific model development. This approach utilizes pre-trained models – neural networks initially trained on extensive datasets – and adapts them for time series forecasting applications. By transferring learned representations, development time and computational resources are significantly reduced compared to training models from scratch. Furthermore, the use of a pre-trained foundation model improves predictive accuracy, particularly in scenarios with limited labeled data, as the model has already acquired a generalized understanding of temporal patterns and dependencies from the initial training phase.

The core of this approach is a Transformer architecture, originally developed for natural language processing, and adapted for time series forecasting. This involves utilizing self-attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different time steps in a sequence, allowing the model to capture long-range dependencies critical for accurate predictions. Modifications to the standard Transformer include adjustments to the embedding layers to handle continuous time series data and alterations to the positional encoding to reflect the temporal order. The Transformer’s inherent parallelization capabilities also facilitate efficient training and inference on large time series datasets, addressing a key limitation of recurrent neural networks traditionally used in this domain.

The foundation model’s capacity for generalization stems from pre-training on extensive, diverse time series datasets. This pre-training process enables the model to learn underlying patterns and temporal dependencies common across various data sources. Consequently, when applied to new, unseen time series – even those with limited historical data – the model can leverage this pre-existing knowledge to generate accurate and robust predictions. This capability significantly reduces the need for large, labeled datasets specific to each forecasting task, accelerating deployment and improving performance in data-scarce environments.

This foundation model predicts a user-selected virtual sensor <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">z^{\prime}_{2}</span> by autoregressively forecasting from available sensor signals <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">z_{1}</span>, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">z_{2}</span>, and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">z_{3}</span>, leveraging trainable signal relevance vectors <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathcal{R}^{\prime}</span> within a transformer architecture to learn signal importance, achieve explainability, and structurally prune irrelevant inputs for improved efficiency.
This foundation model predicts a user-selected virtual sensor z^{\prime}_{2} by autoregressively forecasting from available sensor signals z_{1}, z_{2}, and z_{3}, leveraging trainable signal relevance vectors \mathcal{R}^{\prime} within a transformer architecture to learn signal importance, achieve explainability, and structurally prune irrelevant inputs for improved efficiency.

The Pursuit of Efficiency: A Necessary Pruning

Model sparsification and sparse attention mechanisms are implemented to minimize computational demands and memory usage. Model sparsification reduces the number of parameters in the neural network by removing connections with minimal impact on performance, while sparse attention focuses the attention mechanism on only the most relevant parts of the input sequence. This is achieved by masking irrelevant attention weights, resulting in fewer calculations during the forward pass. The combined effect of these techniques allows for deployment on devices with limited processing power and memory, such as edge devices and embedded systems, without significant performance degradation.

Mixed-precision training leverages reduced-precision floating-point formats, typically FP16 or bfloat16, during the training process. This approach reduces memory bandwidth requirements and allows for increased computational throughput via optimized hardware support on modern GPUs and TPUs. While standard training utilizes FP32 for both weights and activations, mixed-precision training maintains FP32 for critical calculations like parameter updates, while performing the majority of forward and backward passes in lower precision. Techniques like loss scaling are employed to prevent underflow and maintain numerical stability during training with reduced precision, ensuring that accuracy is not compromised despite the accelerated training speed and reduced memory footprint. This results in significant reductions in training time, often in the range of 20-50%, without observable degradation in model performance.

Variate Embedding is a critical component of the model’s functionality, addressing the need to differentiate between multiple input time series data streams. Each time series, representing a physical sensor measurement, is transformed into a unique, high-dimensional vector representation via the embedding layer. This embedding process allows the model to capture the distinct characteristics of each input, preventing interference and ensuring accurate prediction of the target virtual sensor outputs. Without this differentiation, the model would be unable to correctly attribute changes in the virtual sensor readings to specific physical sensor inputs, leading to inaccurate or unstable predictions.

Our sensor selection mechanism effectively increases sparsity by predicting fewer virtual sensors simultaneously, as demonstrated on the Traffic dataset.
Our sensor selection mechanism effectively increases sparsity by predicting fewer virtual sensors simultaneously, as demonstrated on the Traffic dataset.

The Signal and the Noise: Intelligent Selection Takes Hold

The core of this system lies in its ability to discern the varying importance of individual input signals when predicting a virtual sensor’s output. Rather than treating all data streams as equal, the model generates what are termed Signal Relevance Vectors – essentially, dynamic weights assigned to each signal based on its actual contribution to the prediction. These vectors aren’t static; they evolve over time, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions and prioritize the most informative signals. A signal exhibiting a strong correlation with the virtual sensor’s output receives a higher weight, effectively amplifying its influence, while less relevant signals are diminished. This dynamic weighting isn’t based on pre-defined rules or expert knowledge, but is learned directly from the data itself, offering a flexible and data-driven approach to signal selection.

The system intelligently prioritizes the most relevant data streams through a dynamic sensor selection mechanism. Rather than processing information from every available source, the model learns to identify and emphasize signals that contribute most significantly to accurate predictions. This targeted approach dramatically reduces computational overhead, allowing for real-time analysis and deployment on resource-constrained platforms. By focusing on the critical data, the system not only accelerates processing speeds but also minimizes memory requirements, making it a practical solution for complex sensing applications where efficiency is paramount.

Rigorous testing across two distinct datasets – data collected from 17,500 kilometers of CAN bus operation encompassing 18,000 time series samples, and a comprehensive traffic dataset – confirms the model’s robust accuracy and its ability to generalize beyond the specific conditions of its training. This dual validation approach provides compelling evidence that the intelligent signal selection mechanism isn’t simply memorizing patterns within a limited scope, but rather learning underlying relationships applicable to varied, real-world driving scenarios. The success observed in both datasets highlights the potential for broad deployment in diverse automotive and traffic management applications, establishing a foundation for reliable performance in unpredictable environments.

The developed model demonstrates a substantial enhancement in computational efficiency, achieving up to a 415x speedup and a 951x reduction in memory requirements when contrasted with conventional methodologies – all while preserving the integrity of predictive accuracy. This leap in performance is particularly noteworthy considering the extensive computational investment required for initial training, which necessitated 43,500 GPU hours. The significant reduction in resource demands opens possibilities for deployment on edge devices and real-time applications where processing power and memory are constrained, without compromising the reliability of the virtual sensor’s output.

The number of virtual sensors trained in a single iteration impacts the similarity of their input signals for both the Traffic and CAN bus datasets.
The number of virtual sensors trained in a single iteration impacts the similarity of their input signals for both the Traffic and CAN bus datasets.

The pursuit of a unified foundation model, as detailed in the paper, echoes a fundamental truth about complex systems: simplification rarely yields robustness. The model’s focus on signal relevance and sparsity isn’t merely about computational efficiency-it’s an acknowledgement that all inputs aren’t created equal, and that ignoring the irrelevant is vital to sustaining function. As Grace Hopper once stated, “It’s easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission.” This sentiment aligns with the model’s pragmatic approach; it doesn’t attempt to model everything, but instead prioritizes the signals most critical for accurate time series forecasting, accepting a degree of ‘imperfection’ in exchange for scalability and efficiency. The architecture implicitly understands that over-complexity invites cascading failure, and that true progress often requires a willingness to abandon exhaustive modeling in favor of practical utility.

What Echoes Remain?

This work, in its pursuit of a unified foundation for virtual sensing, does not so much solve a problem as relocate its mysteries. The efficiency gained through shared knowledge and signal relevance is merely a reprieve, a temporary silencing of the inevitable entropy. Each abstracted representation, each parameter pruned in the name of speed, is a prophecy of information lost – a future state where the model, inevitably, fails to perceive a critical nuance in the incoming stream. The question is not whether this foundation will falter, but where and when the silence will break.

The focus on sparsity, while laudable, hints at a deeper unease. To deem signals ‘irrelevant’ is an act of faith, a presumption that the system understands the full context of its observations. The truly robust sensor doesn’t discard data; it learns to hold the weight of uncertainty, to detect the ghost signals that precede the avalanche. The pursuit of efficiency, divorced from a corresponding investment in interpretability, risks building black boxes that offer precise predictions…until they do not.

The next iteration will not be about larger models or faster inference. It will be about cultivating systems that confess their limitations, that reveal the provenance of their certainty, and that acknowledge the inherent ambiguity of the world they attempt to model. The true challenge lies not in forecasting time series, but in anticipating the unforeseen – in listening for the echoes that prefigure the next failure.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.20634.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-29 20:25