Predicting Market Moves with Physics-Inspired AI

Author: Denis Avetisyan


A new approach leverages principles from physics to improve the accuracy of cross-covariance forecasting in volatile financial markets.

Cross-correlation estimators, trained on expanding historical financial data from 1995 to 2023, demonstrate out-of-sample mean squared error (MSE) stability between 2017 and 2024-even when tested with shuffled dates-and this performance is consistently affected by both the total number of assets and the relative dimensionality ν when averaged across 1,000 independent runs with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.
Cross-correlation estimators, trained on expanding historical financial data from 1995 to 2023, demonstrate out-of-sample mean squared error (MSE) stability between 2017 and 2024-even when tested with shuffled dates-and this performance is consistently affected by both the total number of assets and the relative dimensionality ν when averaged across 1,000 independent runs with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.

This review presents a physics-informed neural network framework for robust cross-covariance estimation, addressing challenges of non-stationarity and rotational invariance.

Despite recent advances in high-dimensional statistics, accurately forecasting cross-covariance matrices in financial markets remains challenging due to non-stationarity and the prevalence of strong common factors. This paper, ‘Physics-Informed Singular-Value Learning for Cross-Covariances Forecasting in Financial Markets’, addresses this limitation by introducing a novel neural network architecture grounded in random matrix theory. The proposed method learns a nonlinear mapping in the singular-value domain, preserving rotational invariance while adapting to time-varying dynamics and improving upon traditional analytical cleaners. Can this physics-informed approach effectively bridge the gap between asymptotic theory and practical performance in realistic, dynamic financial landscapes?


Unveiling Patterns in High-Dimensional Data

The cross-covariance matrix serves as a fundamental building block in numerous statistical analyses, from portfolio optimization and signal processing to machine learning algorithms like Gaussian processes and discriminant analysis. However, its accurate estimation becomes profoundly challenging as the dimensionality of the data increases-a phenomenon often referred to as the “curse of dimensionality.” The number of parameters to be estimated grows quadratically with the number of variables, quickly exceeding the available sample size. This leads to ill-conditioned estimators-matrices that are nearly singular-and unreliable statistical inference. Consequently, techniques designed for lower dimensions often falter in high-dimensional settings, necessitating the development of specialized methods that leverage prior knowledge, impose structural constraints, or employ regularization to obtain stable and meaningful covariance estimates.

Many established techniques for estimating covariance matrices operate under the assumption of stationarity – that the statistical properties of a process do not change over time. However, this condition frequently fails to hold in practical applications dealing with dynamic systems or non-linear data. Financial time series, for instance, exhibit volatility clustering and shifting distributions, violating the stationarity requirement. Similarly, signals from sensors monitoring evolving physical processes are rarely stationary. Consequently, applying traditional covariance estimation methods to non-stationary data can yield biased estimates and inaccurate inferences. This necessitates the development of more flexible approaches capable of adapting to temporal changes and relaxing the stringent stationarity assumption, often involving techniques like time-varying parameter models or robust estimators less sensitive to deviations from stationarity.

When estimating the covariance matrix in high-dimensional data, simplistic, or ‘naive’ approaches – such as using the sample covariance without regularization – frequently yield estimators that are poorly conditioned. This means the resulting matrix approaches singularity, exhibiting near-zero eigenvalues and extreme sensitivity to input perturbations. Consequently, downstream statistical procedures, including principal component analysis, discriminant analysis, and portfolio optimization, become unstable and unreliable. The ill-conditioning amplifies noise and can lead to drastically incorrect inferences or predictions, as even small errors in the data are magnified during computations involving matrix inversion or eigenvalue decomposition. Addressing this requires more sophisticated techniques that incorporate regularization or shrinkage to improve the estimator’s conditioning and ensure robust performance.

Reliable statistical inference hinges on accurately capturing the relationships within data, a task fundamentally dependent on robust and adaptive covariance estimation. Traditional methods frequently falter when faced with the complexities of modern datasets – high dimensionality, non-stationarity, and the presence of outliers can all severely compromise the validity of covariance matrices. Consequently, estimators must not only reflect the true underlying covariance structure, but also demonstrate resilience to violations of simplifying assumptions and adapt to changing data characteristics. The development of such estimators is therefore critical, enabling accurate hypothesis testing, efficient parameter estimation, and ultimately, trustworthy conclusions drawn from statistical analyses across diverse fields, from finance and genomics to climate science and machine learning. Without these advancements, the potential for spurious findings and flawed decision-making increases significantly, underscoring the paramount importance of continued research in this area.

Cross-correlation estimators trained on financial data from 1995-2024 demonstrate out-of-sample mean squared error (MSE) performance approaching the theoretical lower bound <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">MSE_{RIE}</span> (red dashed line) when tested on both chronologically ordered and shuffled data, with performance influenced by the number of assets and relative dimensionality, as indicated by 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.
Cross-correlation estimators trained on financial data from 1995-2024 demonstrate out-of-sample mean squared error (MSE) performance approaching the theoretical lower bound MSE_{RIE} (red dashed line) when tested on both chronologically ordered and shuffled data, with performance influenced by the number of assets and relative dimensionality, as indicated by 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.

Harnessing Shrinkage for Robust Estimation

Shrinkage estimation improves covariance matrix estimation by addressing the inherent noise and instability of sample covariance matrices, particularly in high-dimensional settings where the number of variables approaches or exceeds the number of observations. Traditional sample covariance estimation, calculated as S = \frac{1}{n-1}X^TX where X is the data matrix and n is the number of observations, becomes unreliable due to limited sample sizes and the estimation of a large number of parameters. Shrinkage estimation mitigates this by combining the sample covariance matrix with a target matrix, typically a scaled identity matrix, effectively “shrinking” the sample estimates towards the target. This regularization process reduces the estimator’s variance, leading to a more stable and accurate estimate, especially for poorly conditioned covariance matrices, and improves generalization performance by preventing overfitting to the observed data.

The BBP shrinkage estimator represents a significant advancement in covariance estimation by providing an analytical, closed-form solution grounded in random matrix theory. Unlike traditional methods, which often rely on sample covariance matrices and are susceptible to instability in high-dimensional, low-sample size scenarios, the BBP estimator leverages results from random matrix theory to optimally shrink the sample covariance towards a well-conditioned target. This analytical form avoids iterative procedures and offers computational efficiency. Specifically, the estimator shrinks the sample covariance Σ towards \tau I, where τ is a shrinkage intensity derived from the eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix, resulting in improved accuracy and stability, particularly when the number of variables exceeds the number of observations.

The BBP shrinkage estimator leverages whitened variables – data transformed to have a zero mean and unit variance, and uncorrelated with each other – to improve covariance estimation. This whitening process, typically achieved through eigenvalue decomposition or singular value decomposition, effectively removes noise and scales the data appropriately before applying the shrinkage estimator. By operating on whitened data, the BBP estimator reduces the impact of poorly estimated eigenvalues associated with high-dimensional data, leading to a more stable and accurate covariance matrix. The use of whitened variables also simplifies the analytical derivation of the optimal shrinkage intensity and enhances the estimator’s robustness to deviations from the assumed underlying data distribution.

Rotationally invariant estimators are critical for covariance estimation because they maintain consistent performance regardless of the data’s underlying orientation or coordinate system. This property ensures stability by preventing the estimator from being overly sensitive to specific data rotations, which can lead to large variances and poor generalization to unseen data. Specifically, these estimators achieve invariance by remaining unchanged under orthogonal transformations; mathematically, if Σ is the true covariance matrix and Q is an orthogonal matrix, then the estimator applied to Q^T X Q yields the same result as applying it to X . This characteristic is particularly important in high-dimensional settings where the risk of overfitting is substantial, and the ability to generalize reliably is paramount.

Analysis of canonical singular values from the reconstructed cross-correlation block demonstrates feasibility via a comparison between the original chronological pipeline and a shuffled control, revealing distinct distributions and a clear relationship between whitened and unwhitened singular values.
Analysis of canonical singular values from the reconstructed cross-correlation block demonstrates feasibility via a comparison between the original chronological pipeline and a shuffled control, revealing distinct distributions and a clear relationship between whitened and unwhitened singular values.

Neural Networks: Adapting to Complex Relationships

Equivariant neural networks enhance covariance estimation by directly integrating known relationships about the data’s structure into the network architecture. Traditional neural networks treat inputs as unordered sets, disregarding inherent symmetries or transformations present in the data; conversely, equivariant networks are designed to maintain specific relationships when the input is transformed. This is achieved through weight sharing or other architectural constraints that enforce the network’s output to transform consistently with the input, reducing the number of learnable parameters and improving generalization performance. By explicitly encoding prior knowledge, these networks can more efficiently and accurately estimate covariance matrices, especially in high-dimensional settings where traditional methods become computationally expensive or require large amounts of data. The resulting covariance estimates are thus more stable and less prone to overfitting, as the network is constrained to learn solutions consistent with the known data structure.

Spectral tokenization provides a method for summarizing cross-covariance relationships by decomposing the covariance matrix into a set of spectral components. This technique leverages the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the covariance matrix to represent the data’s underlying structure in a lower-dimensional space. Extending this with nonlinear shrinkage – typically implemented via a thresholding operation on the spectral components – further refines the representation by suppressing noise and emphasizing dominant modes of variation. The shrinkage process effectively reduces the impact of small eigenvalues, improving the robustness and generalization performance of subsequent analyses by focusing on the most significant cross-covariance patterns. This approach allows for a more compact and informative representation of the data’s relationships than retaining the full covariance matrix, particularly in high-dimensional settings.

A two-stream neural network architecture enhances information processing by employing marginal projections. This approach involves creating two parallel data processing pathways; one stream operates directly on the input data, while the second stream processes marginal projections derived from the original input. These marginal projections effectively reduce dimensionality and capture key statistical relationships within the data. By combining the outputs of both streams, the network achieves improved robustness to noise and variations in input data, while also increasing computational efficiency compared to processing the full-dimensional input in a single stream. This separation of processing allows for more focused feature extraction and reduces the risk of overfitting, ultimately leading to more reliable and accurate results.

Constraining the singular values of covariance matrices is a regularization technique employed to enhance the stability and generalization performance of neural networks. Unbounded singular values can lead to ill-conditioned covariance estimates, increasing sensitivity to noise and potentially causing numerical instability during computations. By imposing an upper limit on these values, the framework prevents the model from fitting to spurious correlations in the training data, thus mitigating overfitting. This bounding operation effectively reduces the variance of the learned parameters and promotes a more robust solution, particularly when dealing with high-dimensional data or limited sample sizes. The specific method used to bound the singular values impacts the degree of regularization and must be tuned to optimize performance.

The neural singular value cleaning architecture constructs additive corrections <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\delta_k</span> by encoding marginal projections <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\overline{\gamma}</span> and singular values <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\overline{s}</span> with a shared encoder and aggregating global context using a bidirectional LSTM.
The neural singular value cleaning architecture constructs additive corrections \delta_k by encoding marginal projections \overline{\gamma} and singular values \overline{s} with a shared encoder and aggregating global context using a bidirectional LSTM.

Towards Statistical Inference Informed by Decision-Making

Traditional covariance estimation often prioritizes statistical accuracy without explicitly considering how these estimations will be used. Decision-aware training fundamentally shifts this approach by directly aligning the covariance estimation process with the requirements of downstream tasks. Rather than simply minimizing an error metric on covariance itself, the model is trained to optimize performance on the specific decision or prediction problem it’s intended to serve. This means the estimated covariance matrix isn’t just a statistically sound representation of variable relationships, but a tailored tool for maximizing accuracy in the target application. Consequently, this direct optimization yields significant performance gains, allowing the model to effectively prioritize relevant information and discard noise, ultimately leading to more robust and efficient statistical inference.

Traditional statistical inference often centers on accurately estimating the covariance matrix, treating it as an end in itself. However, this framework shifts the focus toward leveraging that estimation as a means to improved decision-making. Instead of simply characterizing data relationships, the approach actively shapes the covariance estimation process to directly optimize performance on downstream tasks. This means incorporating task-specific information into the model, allowing it to prioritize the features and relationships most relevant to achieving desired outcomes. The result is a statistically grounded system that doesn’t just describe data, but actively supports and enhances the quality of decisions derived from it, moving beyond passive observation toward active, informed action.

The framework’s adaptability stems from its capacity to integrate task-specific information directly into the covariance estimation process. Rather than applying a universal statistical model, this approach tailors inference to the unique characteristics of each application, acknowledging that the optimal covariance structure varies considerably depending on the decision being made. This is achieved by modulating the statistical learning process with data relevant to the target task, allowing the model to prioritize features and relationships that are most predictive of desired outcomes. Consequently, the system doesn’t merely estimate a covariance matrix, but rather the covariance matrix most relevant for effective decision-making within a specified context, resulting in improved performance and greater utility across diverse applications.

The integration of shrinkage estimation with neural networks represents a significant advancement in statistical inference, yielding improvements across multiple critical dimensions. Shrinkage estimation, a technique for regularizing covariance matrices, combats instability and overfitting, particularly when dealing with high-dimensional data. When coupled with the adaptable learning capabilities of neural networks, this approach creates a system capable of efficiently processing complex datasets and extracting meaningful patterns. The resulting framework not only offers more robust performance – less susceptible to noise and outliers – but also enhances computational efficiency, reducing the resources needed for analysis. Crucially, this synergy doesn’t come at the cost of understanding; the model’s structure facilitates improved interpretability, allowing researchers to discern the underlying relationships driving the statistical inferences and fostering greater confidence in the results.

A key indicator of the model’s reliability lies in the stability of its reconstructed cross-covariance matrix, consistently demonstrated through high feasibility. Analysis reveals that 99.96% of computed canonical singular values fall squarely within the mathematically valid range of [0, 1]. This stringent adherence to feasibility constraints ensures the model doesn’t generate unrealistic or nonsensical covariance estimates. The consistently high percentage confirms the robustness of the approach, suggesting a mathematically sound reconstruction process capable of delivering dependable statistical inference for downstream tasks. This level of stability is particularly crucial in high-dimensional settings where covariance estimation is notoriously challenging, and small errors can propagate significantly, impacting the accuracy and interpretability of results.

The pursuit of robust cross-covariance estimation, as detailed in this work, echoes a fundamental principle of discerning order within complexity. The research leverages physics-informed neural networks to address the challenges of non-stationarity, effectively imposing constraints that guide the learning process. This mirrors Nietzsche’s observation: “There are no facts, only interpretations.” The framework doesn’t merely accept market data as a given, but actively interprets it through the lens of established physical principles – rotational invariance, for instance – to arrive at a more reliable forecast. By imposing structure, the system moves beyond simple data assimilation toward a deeper understanding of underlying dynamics, offering a compelling example of how imposed order can illuminate chaotic systems.

Where Do the Patterns Lead?

The pursuit of rotational invariance in financial modeling, as demonstrated by this work, isn’t merely a technical refinement. It’s an acknowledgement that the underlying dynamics, however chaotic, likely adhere to principles beyond simple statistical correlation. The imposed symmetries, while effective for estimation, raise a more intriguing question: are these symmetries truly intrinsic to the market, or merely a useful constraint imposed by the model? Every deviation from the expected-every outlier in the cross-covariance matrix-becomes an opportunity to uncover hidden dependencies, suggesting the need for techniques that actively seek and interpret these anomalies rather than smoothing them away.

The non-stationarity problem, addressed through physics-informed neural networks, is not solved, but rather shifted. The model adapts, but adaptation implies a continuous re-calibration. Future work might explore methods to predict the rate of non-stationarity, or to identify regimes where stationarity, or approximate stationarity, briefly holds. This would require a deeper engagement with the random matrix theory informing the analysis, perhaps moving beyond simple eigenvalue distributions to examine more complex topological features.

Ultimately, the true test lies not in improving forecast accuracy, but in understanding the limitations of the forecasts themselves. A model that accurately predicts market behavior while failing to explain why that behavior occurs remains incomplete. The challenge, then, is to build models that embrace uncertainty, acknowledge their inherent biases, and reveal, rather than conceal, the underlying patterns – however imperfect – that govern the financial landscape.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.07687.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-13 15:33