\n
Ah, the NY Times, that trumpet of moral superiority, now bellowing about Bitcoin\’s “excessive energy consumption”-a modern drama of misplaced outrage! How tragically funny, the self-appointed guardians of virtue, wielding marginal emission calculations like a priest quoting a dead letter to condemn a plague. đ¤Ą
\n
“Indeed, the Bitcoin maxis were not mistaken (once more),” scoffs Daniel Batten, that hero of the keyboard, in a post ripe with the aroma of schadenfreude. “Behold, the NYTâs âjunk scienceâ now squirmed under the microscope of academia!”
\n
Methodology? What Methodology? đ
\n
This “anti-Bitcoin narrative,” as Batten calls it, now lies before us-nailed by a peer-reviewed study from Nature Climate Change, as though struck by divine comedy. The NYT, in their wisdom, imagined Bitcoin miners slurping fossil fuels like a cavern of Mongols-câest absurde!
\n
Remember the NYTimes hitpiece on Bitcoin? That âgreenâ crusade? We told you it was junk science, and⌠surprise! A peer-reviewed study debunks their marginal emission witchcraft. đ§âď¸
– Daniel Batten (@DSBatten) October 27, 2025
\n
Embrace this truth: marginal emissions are not the gospel, but a knight without armor. The NYTâs static estimate of climate impact? A ghost of the 19th century! The truth lies in dynamic systems, where solar panels at noon displace clean energy, not death-dealing coal. đ
\n
Battenâs rebuttal, henceforth, is a pastoral letter of logic: Bitcoinâs COâ footprint? Overestimated! Miners, those mythical creatures, feast on curtailed renewables and clean energy-neither a satanic ritual nor a Hamlet of destruction. đ§
\n
Ah, the NY Times, that trumpet of moral superiority, now bellowing about Bitcoin’s “excessive energy consumption”-a modern drama of misplaced outrage! How tragically funny, the self-appointed guardians of virtue, wielding marginal emission calculations like a priest quoting a dead letter to condemn a plague. đ¤Ą
“Indeed, the Bitcoin maxis were not mistaken (once more),” scoffs Daniel Batten, that hero of the keyboard, in a post ripe with the aroma of schadenfreude. “Behold, the NYTâs âjunk scienceâ now squirmed under the microscope of academia!”
Methodology? What Methodology? đ
This “anti-Bitcoin narrative,” as Batten calls it, now lies before us-nailed by a peer-reviewed study from Nature Climate Change, as though struck by divine comedy. The NYT, in their wisdom, imagined Bitcoin miners slurping fossil fuels like a cavern of Mongols-câest absurde!
Remember the NYTimes hitpiece on Bitcoin? That âgreenâ crusade? We told you it was junk science, and⌠surprise! A peer-reviewed study debunks their marginal emission witchcraft. đ§âď¸
– Daniel Batten (@DSBatten) October 27, 2025
Embrace this truth: marginal emissions are not the gospel, but a knight without armor. The NYTâs static estimate of climate impact? A ghost of the 19th century! The truth lies in dynamic systems, where solar panels at noon displace clean energy, not death-dealing coal. đ
Battenâs rebuttal, henceforth, is a pastoral letter of logic: Bitcoinâs COâ footprint? Overestimated! Miners, those mythical creatures, feast on curtailed renewables and clean energy-neither a satanic ritual nor a Hamlet of destruction. đ§
Read More
- Movie Games responds to DDS creatorâs claims with $1.2M fine, saying they arenât valid
- The MCUâs Mandarin Twist, Explained
- All Golden Ball Locations in Yakuza Kiwami 3 & Dark Ties
- These are the 25 best PlayStation 5 games
- SHIB PREDICTION. SHIB cryptocurrency
- Scream 7 Will Officially Bring Back 5 Major Actors from the First Movie
- Server and login issues in Escape from Tarkov (EfT). Error 213, 418 or âthere is no game with name eftâ are common. Developers are working on the fix
- Rob Reinerâs Son Officially Charged With First Degree Murder
- MNT PREDICTION. MNT cryptocurrency
- Every Death In The Night Agent Season 3 Explained
2025-10-27 09:45