In the sixth season of “I Am a Killer,” five real-life criminal investigations take center stage, and it’s the third episode, focusing on the Walter Triplett Jr case, that has ignited intense conversations among Netflix users.
In 2018, the documentary series focused on an anthology style premiered, originally showcasing interviews with death row inmates. Over time, though, its structure evolved to encompass individuals incarcerated for murder or similar offenses as well.
In the initial episodes of I Am a Killer’s sixth season, now available on the streaming platform starting from January 8th, we delve into the stories of convicted murderers Candie Dominguez and Daniel Lopez.
In the upcoming episode titled ‘Defense of Another’, our journey shifts from Texas to Ohio. Here, we encounter a man who has spent the last 15 years behind bars, and learn about the profound effects this imprisonment has had on his twin sister. Please be advised that some viewers may find this material emotionally challenging.
The case of Walter Triplett Jr explained
The story of Walter Triplett Jr, while creating a mixed reaction among viewers, may seem puzzling at first glance. However, to fully appreciate it, let’s delve into the background details. In the episode, we learn that Walter struggled with difficulties in his childhood, which eventually led him towards drug use.
In 2009, after multiple arrests, Triplett made a significant change in his life upon becoming a father. At just 27 years old, he chose to further his education by enrolling in college and established a business offering venue security services.
On a chilly April evening in 2009, I found myself stepping out with my twin sister Tonya Triplett, my lively cousin Crystal, and her beloved Woo-Woo. Our destination was a local watering hole, where we hoped to unwind after a long week. However, the tranquility was soon disrupted as a brawl erupted within the bar. We swiftly made our exit, but unfortunately, the tumult followed us like a shadow.
The situation escalated dramatically as Walter noticed two individuals cornering his sister. In response, he delivered a punch that sent both men crashing to the ground. One man eventually woke up, but the other, identified as Michael Corrado, remained motionless.
Michael tragically passed away 18 hours after being taken to the hospital. At the location of the incident, Walter was apprehended. Despite a lack of concrete evidence for a murder indictment, he stood trial for involuntary manslaughter in September 2009.
Out of the twelve jurors, eleven were Caucasian. As stated by Walter’s mother, Mary Triplett, the prosecution depicted her son as if he were a wild beast. However, in Mary’s opinion, the judge was the most problematic.
Every time the prosecutor spoke, she’d chime in with brief remarks that often seemed insightful. When we looked at her, she’d remark, ‘That can’t be refuted,'” she admits, adding, “But you’re supposed to maintain impartiality up there.
In the initial court case, the jury failed to agree on a verdict for manslaughter, resulting in Walter being convicted for aggravated battery instead. The judge then handed down the maximum penalty of 18 years imprisonment.
In February 2011, Walter challenged the verdict and was granted a fresh hearing. Unfortunately, during this second trial, he faced the same judge and an exclusively white jury, leading to a guilty verdict on all counts, which included involuntary manslaughter.
The judge gave him the maximum sentence of 20 years.
I Am a Killer Season 6 Episode 3 leaves viewers divided
Some viewers maintain that Walter’s sentence is justified, but others contend that he’s been unfairly targeted due to bias.
On the subreddit dedicated to true crime shows, someone posed the question, “Does anyone else find themselves torn about the ‘Walter’ episode?
The other person stated, “I found the prosecutor’s manner of speaking displeasing… it seemed as though they implied that Walter and his family might be on to something. Particularly when he mentioned that people use race as a last resort. Frankly, this comment struck me as inappropriate and offensive.
The comment he made definitely caught me off guard. In fact, I was taken aback, almost as if it had left a mark on me – sort of like ‘whoa, not cool.’
Regardless of his willingness to admit it, we’re dealing with an American situation here, where the dispute involved a black individual versus a collective of white individuals. Let’s be honest about this.
To counter Walter’s accusation of racism, he might have simply shared the evidence that led the jury to their decision, instead of coming off as if he was using racially insensitive language.
I’m puzzled about how the jury selection process unfolded. It seemed like an opportunity for a more diverse jury might have been missed, given that Cleveland serves as the base for selecting jurors, even though I understand juries are pulled from the county, not just the city.
Showing their differing perspectives on the crime, one individual remarked, “He’s absolutely not a heartless murderer,” to which another responded, “He may not be, but if he took a life intentionally or unintentionally, accountability is still necessary.
In the Netflix documentary I’ve been eagerly watching, another spectator brought my attention to the CCTV footage that was aired, revealing an incident where Tonya was assaulted. Remarkably, it was Walter who rushed to her aid.
In simpler terms, “The video, though somewhat blurry, fully supported Walter’s claim. It showed that he wasn’t the one who started the incident, but instead, he rushed over when it happened at his sister’s place.
As a fan, I can’t help but admire that instead of resorting to brutal actions like strangulation or repeated kicks, he opted for just one powerful punch. While the punch was undeniably forceful, judging by how the other person flew, it didn’t seem to be lethal on its own. However, I believe it was the subsequent impact of his head with the pavement that likely caused the injury.
It appears that Walter’s reaction might have warranted a conviction due to being excessively strong, however, the proposed sentence seems unusually harsh.
A different individual observed, “If his past didn’t include numerous acts of violence, perhaps the outcome would have been different for him. However, it’s also possible that the person who passed away wouldn’t have been implicated in the first place.
“It seems like he was simply in the wrong spot at the wrong moment. Walter might not have needed to resort to violence right away when encountering someone; perhaps he could have found another way to safeguard his sister.
Currently, you can stream “I Am a Killer” Season 6 on Netflix. If you’re interested in more real crime updates, check out our latest posts about potential developments in “Natalia Grace” Season 4, the anticipated release date for the upcoming “Ruby Franke” documentary series, and our insights into the “Jerry Springer” docu-series.
Read More
- FARTCOIN PREDICTION. FARTCOIN cryptocurrency
- SUI PREDICTION. SUI cryptocurrency
- Excitement Brews in the Last Epoch Community: What Players Are Looking Forward To
- The Renegades Who Made A Woman Under the Influence
- RIF PREDICTION. RIF cryptocurrency
- Smite 2: Should Crowd Control for Damage Dealers Be Reduced?
- Is This Promotional Stand from Suicide Squad Worth Keeping? Reddit Weighs In!
- Epic Showdown: Persona vs Capcom – Fan Art Brings the Characters to Life
- Persona Music Showdown: Mass Destruction vs. Take Over – The Great Debate!
- “Irritating” Pokemon TCG Pocket mechanic is turning players off the game
2025-01-09 15:54