Is Ripple Abandoning XRP? Convera Partnership Sparks Heated Debate

by

In the grand theater of global finance, a new act has unfolded. One of the world’s largest commercial payments companies, Convera, has entered into a strategic partnership with Ripple. This partnership, though cloaked in promise, has ignited a firestorm of debate. The ink may have barely dried on the deal, yet opinions are already flying like wild birds in a storm.

Convera, a juggernaut operating across 140 currencies and in over 200 countries, confirmed today its decision to tie its fate to Ripple’s blockchain infrastructure. Their goal? To offer businesses a better way to send money across borders-faster, cheaper, and hopefully, with fewer hiccups. The deal focuses on regions where traditional payment systems drag their feet like an old man with a cane-slow, costly, and often unreliable.

The new payment model, which has been dubbed the “stablecoin sandwich,” is certainly an interesting creation. Here’s the gimmick: payments start in fiat, settle in the middle with regulated stablecoins (the so-called “meat” of the sandwich), and then return to fiat on the other side, all the while leaving Convera to handle the customer experience. Ripple, on the other hand, quietly manages the liquidity, the on-and-off ramps, and the settlement infrastructure lurking beneath the surface like the unseen gears of a well-oiled machine.

“By partnering with Convera, we’re combining trusted global payment infrastructure with stablecoin-powered settlement to give businesses more control over how and when they move value across borders,” said Aaron Slettehaugh, Ripple’s SVP of Product, perhaps not realizing the bombshell he was about to drop on a certain community’s hopes.

The Absence of XRP: A Subtle Omission or a Grand Betrayal?

And here, dear reader, is where the plot thickens.

The announcement was made without so much as a whisper of XRP. Not a single mention. No callout to the XRP Ledger. In a world where many had long placed their faith in Ripple as the harbinger of the blockchain revolution, this omission was not only loud-it was deafening. The community, which had watched Ripple’s slow march toward institutional partnerships, felt the sting of betrayal as the very asset they had championed seemed to be left in the dust.

One astute observer, no doubt rolling their eyes at the spectacle, commented: “Forget no mention of XRP, they don’t even explicitly state they’re using the XRPL.” Clearly, a masterstroke of understatement, a sentiment shared by many.

The ever-ceremonious crypto lawyer, Bill Morgan, whose commentary on Ripple has often been as dry as a desert wind, offered his thoughts: “They didn’t call it an XRP sandwich model.” A line that would have made even the most stoic of philosophers crack a wry smile. But his earlier remark, delivered with surgical precision, cut deeper: The partnership relies entirely on regulated stablecoins at the settlement layer-XRP, it seems, has been conspicuously left out of this grand scheme.

Whether this omission is a temporary oversight or a deliberate snub, or perhaps a shadowy game involving RLUSD that remains undisclosed, only time will tell. But for now, the question lingers, unanswered-will XRP ever play a role in this brave new world of stablecoin settlements?

Read More

2026-03-31 20:38