Greenland 2: Migration Review: A Rare Gem In A Genre Defined By Action And Spectacle Over Logic And Depth

by

The movie Greenland 2: Migration tackles a question most disaster films avoid: what happens after the initial catastrophe? While films like 2012 briefly show humanity trying to rebuild, and Greenland ends with a similar idea, this movie delves into the realistic challenges and consequences of a world trying to move forward after a major disaster.

However, it’s the small details that make Greenland 2 work, successfully capturing the same intense feeling and excitement as the first film.

The Last Of Us Meets Disasters On The Big Screen (And It Actually Works)

Sequels are always a challenge, but making a sequel to a disaster movie is especially tough. Disaster films already ask a lot of viewers to believe improbable scenarios. While Greenland didn’t stretch credibility as much as another Gerard Butler film, Geostorm, it still required some acceptance of unlikely events, even regarding the Garrity family’s survival in the first movie.

While Greenland 2 shares some of the same challenges as the first film, it successfully meets the emotional demands of its viewers – which is quite an accomplishment. The sequel takes place several years after the events of Greenland, and the world isn’t recovering as optimistically as the first film’s ending implied. Despite the final scene of Greenland suggesting global recovery and rebuilding, Greenland 2 starts with things looking much worse.

The Garrity family, along with everyone else who reached the Greenland shelter, is stuck there for now. The air is poisonous, and the planet is constantly battered by storms and unexpected impacts from comet debris. Sadly, this disaster hasn’t brought people together; instead, war, violence, and a desperate fight for limited resources mean that other humans are just as dangerous as the natural disasters themselves.

One of the best things about Greenland 2 is that the danger still feels very real and comes from directions you don’t expect. While there are still exciting disaster scenes – including tsunamis, a classic movie spectacle – the film focuses more on what people would actually go through in a crisis like this and how difficult things would truly be.

Unlike many typical disaster movies, Greenland 2 feels more like the TV show The Last of Us. While it features the expected comet strikes and thrilling escapes, it also focuses on harsh, realistic scenes – including violence and the desperate actions people take when fighting for survival. It shows how far people will go to protect themselves, even if it means abandoning others.

The actors still deliver heartfelt performances. What made the first Greenland stand out was its focus on the Garrity family, even with a world-ending comet as the main threat. Greenland 2 successfully repeats this approach, making the relationships and struggles of John (Gerard Butler), Allison (Morena Baccarin), and Nathan (Roman Griffin Davis) just as important as the somewhat unbelievable geological events happening around them.

Beyond just the central family’s story, Greenland 2 pays attention to small but impactful details, like the government prioritizing mental health support by sending more therapists than doctors to the shelters. While you wouldn’t typically expect to see Gerard Butler in a therapy session in a disaster film, this choice sets the stage for the movie’s eventual focus.

What really makes this sequel stand out is that it doesn’t rely on pointless destruction and death just for shock value – a common mistake in these kinds of films. It actually has something to say, and it delivers that message effectively, without feeling forced or predictable. The core idea isn’t groundbreaking, but the movie deserves credit for managing to explore meaningful themes while still being thrilling and action-packed.

While generally good, Greenland 2 had a few weak spots. It felt a bit unrealistic how easily the Garrity family found help from strangers, especially considering the film emphasized that everyone was focused on their own survival. Just when things looked dire, someone always seemed to appear and offer assistance.

The issue with Nathan’s insulin feels like a plot hole in Greenland 2 simply because it was so important in the first movie. His forgetting it is what initially prevented the Garrity family from reaching the bunker. Considering the first Greenland film emphasized the government denying aid to people with pre-existing conditions, it’s strange they somehow had a multi-year supply of insulin available.

The story’s focus on the migration doesn’t dwell on Nathan’s need for insulin, only briefly mentioning Allison telling him to take what he can. This isn’t a major issue, though, as it’s reasonable to assume the government prioritized resource hoarding during the crisis, and Nathan likely managed his insulin privately. It’s easy to picture him dealing with it without it being shown on screen, even if those with chronic conditions weren’t specifically being saved.

Overall, the issues with this film are minor. Greenland 2 stands out as a disaster movie that’s both smart and engaging, demonstrating that the genre doesn’t have to be illogical and that sequels can be just as compelling as the original.

Read More

2026-01-08 17:59