Destiny 2: Why the Fourth Horseman’s Changes Are Ruffling Feathers

by

In Destiny 2, there’s been a mix of good and bad moments, but the latest adjustment to a beloved weapon, the Fourth Horseman, has left players scratching their heads more than trying to solve a Rubik’s Cube without seeing it. The stir started when Bungie revealed changes to the weapon’s functioning, such as reducing its fire rate and introducing a “reload on kill” feature. These alterations have caused a lot of confusion and discontent among players of this grand multiplayer shooter game, who are struggling to comprehend why these modifications were made. With this new controversy arising, it seems that Bungie’s plans may not have been as smoothly received as they intended.

Summary

  • Players are not impressed with Bungie’s decision to lower the fire rate of the Fourth Horseman while introducing a reload-on-kill mechanic.
  • Many believe the changes seem counterintuitive, especially since the weapon was primarily used for single-target damage, not ad-clearing.
  • There are theories suggesting that Bungie is tweaking the weapon to address balance issues with hyper damage output.
  • An overwhelming request for community feedback has come to light as players seek a more inclusive decision-making process regarding balance changes.

The Great Weapon Nerf: What Were They Thinking?

The discussions in the subreddit initially revolve around confusion about the reasoning behind the weapon’s adjustment, commonly known as the Fourth Horseman. This firearm is famed for obliterating enemies at an alarming pace, much like a toddler tearing through Christmas presents. However, recent changes have left many community members bewildered and perplexed. A user named Brutykus succinctly expresses this sentiment by asking: “If the intention is to emphasize the weapon’s rapid-fire ability, why decrease the firing speed and add reload on kill?” It appears as though Bungie is attempting to make the deal more appealing by offering a perk that seems incongruous with the intended function of the weapon.

The main function of Fourth Horseman traditionally focused on dealing massive damage to individual enemies. However, it appears that this adjustment is making it less effective for this role while suggesting potential benefits for handling groups of enemies, which it was never particularly good at. Originally, the weapon was engineered for swift, powerful shots. Now, the design seems geared towards reducing enjoyment for high Damage Per Second (DPS) players. If the majority of fans were given the chance to advise Bungie, they would likely say “Oh dear, please reconsider!

Reload on Kill: Valuable or Vague?

The “reload-on-kill” feature is generating some skepticism among players. One user in the post notes this could be seen as an effort to make the weapon better for swiftly defeating mini-bosses or champions, which seems more like a compromise for a secondary character instead of a powerful, dominant weapon. The idea of a reload mechanism on a shotgun doesn’t exactly shout “I’m a boss-slayer!” Instead, players might prefer a weapon that operates in a different way, one that gives them confidence when facing tougher enemies, rather than depending on reloading after every kill.

A user named koolaidman486 suggests that Bungie might be addressing latency problems caused by the weapon’s rapid damage output with the fire rate nerf. This viewpoint adds depth to what seemed like a straightforward decision at first. It seems possible that Bungie is trying to prevent potential issues from escalating. However, linking it to latency could be seen as an apologetic explanation veiled in a layer of discontent. The situation appears to revolve around finding a balance between ensuring gameplay fun and maintaining overall game stability—a positive perspective for players to hold onto amidst the current state of uncertainty.

Comparisons to Ambitious Assassin

The chat among community members about the Fourth Horseman weapon also touches on its similarities with the Ambitious Assassin perk, as they ponder whether the reload-after-kill feature has any parallels. According to a user named pitperson, one of Bungie’s messages hints that the reload will operate more like Subsistence rather than straight Ambitious Assassin. This revelation only adds to the confusion, as gamers question if this adjustment will make the weapon useful in actual game situations without depleting the ammo too rapidly.

Players understand that if the reload advantages are substantial, the Fourth Horseman could match certain battle scenarios particularly well – perhaps proving extremely effective against mini-bosses or champions, as some players propose. This raises an intriguing concept of weapons adapting to changing game conditions. However, it’s crucial to prevent players from feeling deceived during this evolution process. Players tend to favor reliable weapons, and currently, the Fourth Horseman seems more like a risky bet than a proven DPS force.

Player Sentiments: A Call for Engagement

As a dedicated player, I can’t help but echo the sentiments shared during these discussions, which largely revolve around Bungie’s communication with us, their players. A comment from Blahaj_Kell_of_Trans encapsulates a widespread feeling: “They don’t seem to want us using this on raid bosses; they prefer it for champions and mini-bosses.” This sentiment mirrors the frustration felt by many when our suggestions seem to go unheard. The call for improved communication has been deafening, with players yearning to be part of the decision-making process, particularly when it comes to alterations in weapon mechanics, changes that can significantly redefine gameplay.

As a dedicated gamer, I can’t help but yearn for more in-game polls or surveys within our community. These interactions could strengthen the bond between players and developers, enhancing transparency and collaboration. The buzz around alterations to the Fourth Horseman resonates deeply with many of us, reminding us of its original charm. It’s not just about tweaking the game balance in the moment; it’s about growing together as a community, ensuring that changes align with our preferences while preserving the soul of what makes Destiny 2 exceptional.

As a dedicated fan, I’ve noticed a noticeable split in opinions about the changes to the Fourth Horseman, which seems to reflect a gap between Bungie’s design vision and our community’s response. Some of us are open to this new direction, while others feel taken aback, viewing these mechanical adjustments as misguided. As conversations evolve and feelings are shared, it’s evident that Bungie needs to strengthen the connection with the community to address the issues that surface. It’s not just beneficial for Bungie to keep us satisfied; it’s crucial because a content Guardian fosters a vibrant universe.

Read More

2025-01-28 04:29