David Lynch Was a Singular Filmmaker Whose Dreams Will Always Walk With Us

by

Some artists possess an extraordinary vision and audacity in their creativity, leaving an indelible mark on our collective consciousness that it’s challenging to envision the world without them. David Lynch, who recently passed away at 78, was undoubtedly one of these exceptional talents. Mentioning his name alone, David Lynch (which seems so ordinary), summons not just a list of timeless films but an elevated realm of the imagination: a hauntingly captivating surrealist wonderland where dreams and reality intertwine.

In a bold and fearless manner, Lynch redefined cinema by taking the raw, homegrown avant-garde creativity brewing within him and transforming it into an aesthetic that flipped traditional Hollywood storytelling on its head. My first experience with a film by Lynch occurred in 1977, during my college years. One of our campus film societies had the foresight to display a massive poster featuring the title character of “Eraserhead” as part of their schedule. All semester long, this ominous image adorned my wall, leaving us all intrigued and eager for more. Finally, the night arrived when we were to watch “Eraserhead.” The auditorium was filled to capacity, and it would be an understatement to say that the film matched up to its poster. The soundtrack, a chaotic mix of whooshes and roars, was captivating. The visuals – Henry with his eraser-like hair, the monstrous baby, the woman in the radiator – seemed to stem from a twisted, illogical nightmare that somehow became our very own nightmares.

Despite its eerie atmosphere, “Eraserhead” was captivating. It conveyed a tale that kept you on the edge of your seat with each mind-bending turn, much like being trapped within its suffocating walls. In New York, this film became a late-night sensation, but it stands out among other legendary midnight movies as they seem to hail from the same period. Instead, Lynch’s staging of “Eraserhead” was timelessly bold, making it feel just as fresh and relevant today as when it was first released. It carries an eternal quality like “Psycho,” a Dalí painting, or a work by Bosch.

How can one possibly follow up a masterpiece like “Eraserhead,” often hailed as the most genuine dream-film ever created? David Lynch achieved this by directing “The Elephant Man” (1980), a classical drama that seamlessly blended elements of body horror with poignant human tragedy. This film, while being a Hollywood production and even receiving Oscar nominations, was undeniably Lynch’s own unique work. He then outdid himself and every other filmmaker of the time with the mad genius of “Blue Velvet” (1986), a film-noir gone awry. This was followed by the eerie soap opera of “Twin Peaks,” which premiered in 1990. The wholesome Americana portrayed in “The Straight Story” (1999) was both topsy-turvy and sincere. “Mulholland Drive” (2001) presented a Hollywood nightmare reminiscent of “Vertigo” on acid. To top it all off, Lynch also created paintings, videos, cartoons, and even meditation pieces.

David Lynch, known for his unconventional style, crafted films that seemed like unsettling paintings brought to life. However, beneath this avant-garde exterior, he was an inherent storyteller who aimed to immerse viewers in the scene and make them forget their own existence, much like movies did during the golden age of studio productions. It came as no shock when Lynch was selected by Mel Brooks’ production company to direct “The Elephant Man.” What stood out was his unique portrayal of John Merrick, filled with awe-struck, clinical horror that transformed deformity into poetry. What was unexpected was his exceptional storytelling ability. To him, narrative and enchantment were essentially the same thing.

Although “Dune,” released in 1984, was both a commercial and artistic flop, I believe David Lynch made the right decision to direct it. Science fiction had become the trend of the era; it was logical for him to explore this genre. Furthermore, one could argue that he creatively utilized the movie’s failure. Having agreed to create a blockbuster and adapting someone else’s work, he approached the project with a unique “never again” determination.

Blue Velvet,” a film I consider Lynch’s most brilliant masterpiece, was born from the haunting depths of his imagination following “Dune.” The character of Frank Booth, the psychopathic drug-fueled, rage-driven and fetishistic individual, left audiences in 1986 deeply disturbed. Describing the unsettling impact of this movie is nearly impossible, yet it was a suspenseful thriller with a romantic noir twist that effectively transformed the hero’s peeping tom behavior into a shared experience for the audience, demonstrating a force akin to a modern Hitchcock.

Beyond being hailed as the best film of the ’80s, I believe “Blue Velvet” was also one of the most influential movies of that era. This is due to its pivotal role in igniting the independent film movement, propelling it into uncharted territories. While it may seem that this revolution truly took off three years later with films like “sex, lies and videotape” and the rise of Harvey Weinstein, it was actually “Blue Velvet” (with a helping hand from “Blood Simple”) that redefined independent cinema as a raw, unbridled interpretation of classic Hollywood. In a similar vein, “Twin Peaks” can be seen as equally groundbreaking, as David Lynch dared to bring the spirit of “Blue Velvet” to television, thereby heralding the dawn of modern TV’s golden age. It served as a powerful inspiration, demonstrating what was possible in this new medium.

By the end of the ’80s, Lynch attained celebrity status, with his persona being polished by his high-profile relationship with Isabella Rossellini, the bold co-star from “Blue Velvet.” It was around this time that Lynch’s primary sources of inspiration took root – he had an innate sense, or perhaps a mischievous artistic impulse, to view his own life as a canvas for his creative expressions.

As a cinephile, I’ve always admired how he subtly wove the threads of his life into the fabric of his films, creating an intriguing self-mythology that resonates deeply with me. Born in Missoula, Montana, 1946, he grew up in the ’50s, finding comfort and fear in that conformist era – the surface tranquility masked a deeper, more terrifying reality.

Attending art school in Philadelphia left him with a vivid memory of a city devastated by bombings, which he transformed into the foundation of his creative imagination. His magnum opus, “Eraserhead,” took five years to create, and he filmed its haunting black-and-white world on AFI soundstages in LA, never disclosing the secrets behind the grotesque image of the monster baby, a precursor to the creature in “Alien.”

He often shared stories about his daily visits to Bob’s Big Boy in LA, sipping coffee and milkshakes, finding solace there to let his mind wander freely. His fashion sense – tailored shirts buttoned high and a wavy mane of hair – echoed the dapper style of downtown, while his speech was peppered with wide-eyed exclamations that made him sound like a slightly cracked Jimmy Stewart.

A devotee of transcendental meditation, he sought refuge in this modern-day safe space. And above all, he never wasted a single frame of film – each shot reflected his unwavering conviction.

Critics today often consider “Mulholland Drive,” released in 2001, as director David Lynch’s masterpiece. While I believe this film is extraordinary, I haven’t always agreed with the idea that it’s his absolute best work. I think critics are captivated by how “Mulholland Drive” dismantles itself, but to me, it’s the themes in “Blue Velvet” that were more powerfully groundbreaking. For me, these themes resonated with a raw intensity that was even more striking in “Blue Velvet.” Additionally, I’ve noticed a pattern in Lynch’s work where he revisits certain themes, atmospheres, and motifs. This started to become apparent in “Wild at Heart,” a film I don’t particularly enjoy due to Nicolas Cage’s overly stylized acting which detracts from the movie. You can also see this pattern in parts of “Lost Highway” and the fragmented video collage of “Inland Empire.” However, Lynch has consistently challenged himself. His 2017 reboot of “Twin Peaks” was a bold and audacious example of television at its most daring.

In perhaps the defining moment of his filmmaking journey, as depicted in “Blue Velvet,” Dean Stockwell portrays a character resembling a maniacal gangster jester, illuminating his painted face with an industrial light akin to a microphone and lip-syncing Roy Orbison’s “In Dreams.” The song lyrics read: “In dreams, I walk with you/In dreams, I talk with you/In dreams you’re mine, all of the time/We’re together in dreams.” As the story unfolds, these words embody the perspective of Frank Booth, the menacing drug-addicted, sadomasochistic greaser psychopath, played exceptionally by Dennis Hopper. He embeds his own darkness within Jeffrey (Kyle MacLachlan), the film’s seemingly ordinary protagonist. However, the lyrics could also mirror David Lynch’s creative philosophy. His films are akin to dreams that converse with us, accompany us, and subtly invade our thoughts in an eerie yet unforgettable manner. Now that he has passed away, I wish to tell him: May you rest peacefully in your dreams.

Read More

2025-01-17 03:17